Mercedes-Benz Forum banner

S65 AMG = trouble only trouble

14K views 16 replies 12 participants last post by  S550mobile  
#1 ·
My name is Andrea Masini and I would like to bring to your attention the unpleasant incident our Company experienced with the S Series Mercedes Benz (W221 series).
Background.
On 19th February 2007 our Company bought a S420 CDI Mercedes Benz at the Mercedes Benz dealer of viale del Ghisallo, Milan, which was paid 136.000,00 Euros (fully accessorized indeed) and ran 7.000 km from 19th February to 25th July 2007.
During those 5 months of “use”, several servicing interventions (under guarantee) were necessary because of the following accessories’ malfunctioning:
- seats (dynamic seat and massage function);
- engine failure warning light;
- electric back headrest.
More precisely, in April 2007 (the car was unusable from 3rd to 10th April) the car remained in the service centre for 7 days because of driver’s seat malfunctioning (invoice/guarantee nr. 55060 of 10/04/2007). Successively, in May 2007 (the car was unusable from 17th May to 5th June) the car remained in the service centre for 20 days because of engine, seats and back headrest malfunctioning (invoice/guarantee nr. 58061 of 05/06/2007). In 105 days (from 19/2 to 5/6) the car was stopped for 27 days, which means 25% of its “life". In a meeting I had with Dr. Marco Castiglioni, Sales Manager at Mercedes Benz of via del Ghisallo, Milan, I was showed a S65 AMG V-MAX Mercedes Benz.
I am very keen on sport cars which I am deeply expert of, as I own, among others, Porsche, Mercedes, Bmw and Audi models. It was exactly thanks to the intervention of Milan’s Mercedes Benz dealer, that I had the opportunity to test the S65 AMG during a demo at AMG in Germany. After the test, in order to put an end to the electronic troubles the car suffered, the S420 CDI was replaced by the S65 AMG. It is redundant to highlight that the S65 AMG is the leading model of the S series produced by Mercedes Benz and is the third most expensive model of Mercedes Benz production; it is, in fact, a more than 5 m long, opulent sedan with a sport-like engine specifically built by the Mercedes AMG sport department. Trustful and, regrettably, obstinate, on 26th July 2007 we registered the new car to replace the S 420 CDI. The car cost 233.000,00 Euros and, after only a few days (precisely on 30th July, that is, 4 days after delivery!!), it underwent the first series of problems concerning the malfunctioning of the multicontour seats, in particular, the massage function and the dynamic seat (invoice/guarantee n. 61553 of 04/08/2007). The same problem had already been experienced with the S420 CDI model, as the same Mercedes’ people perfectly knew, according to a post-sale service report of 2nd August 2007 (attachment 1). The seats problem was fixed a few days before summer holidays, when the car had not been used for 6 days (the car was unusable from 30th July to 4th August).
In September 2007 (the car was unusable from 27th September to 1st October) the car still presented the seat problem as showed in invoice/guarantee n. 64002 of 01/10/2007, causing another 6-day stop of the car.
In October 2007 (the car was unusable from 12th to 18th October) the car still had the same seat problem, as confirmed by the invoice/guarantee n. 64951 of 18/10/2007, causing another 8-day car stop. In November 2007 (the car was unusable from 19th November to 4th December), other problems concerning the Distronic plus system (photographic evidence) came out, leading to a new service period during which the car had consequently been unusable for 17 days (invoice/guarantee n. 67495 of 04/12/2007). In December 2007 (the car was unusable from 13th to 22nd December), a few days after the car had been returned following to the repairing of the above mentioned faults, the very same problems occurred again (photographic evidence), leaving the car unusable for 10 days (invoice/guarantee n. 68447 of 22/12/2007). As at 22nd December the "wonder car" had only run 5.586 km in less than 5 months and had been in the service centre for 47 days (more than 30% of its "life"). In February 2008 (the car was unusable from 5th to 8th February) another check was necessary for the same old problem of the Distronic plus system and of the air conditioner, with consequent 3-day car stop (invoice/guarantee n. 51215 of 02/02/2008). Once collected the car (8th February 2008), the problem occurred again as attested by an e-mail Dr Masini sent to the Vip Service Manager. In June 2008 (the car was unusable from 17th to 27th June), the car was left in service centre for 10 additional days because of the “usual” problem of the Distronic plus system (invoice/guarantee n. 30057657 of 27/06/2008). In July 2008 the external temperature sensor reported 48,5 degrees, notwithstanding the car was running, and, in addition, the navigation system did not work properly, failing to update the data during the journey (car unusable from 24th July to 6th August), which caused another 14-day car stop (invoice/guarantee n. 30059536 of 06/08/2008). In January 2009 (from 14th to 30th January) the car was returned to Mercedes Benz Milano to repair the umpteenth problem of the driver’s dynamic seat and the back headrest, determining a 17-day stop (invoice/guarantee n. 30001151 of 02/02/2009). On 1st February 2009, after only 100 km, the car suffered a Distronic plus system problem, apparently because of the weather (it was sleeting).
The car was brought to Mercedes on 4th February and collected on 6th February (video available on http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P-GL0rJ0J_U).

I would like to point out that the car has always been properly checked on occasion both of the scheduled servicing and of the several controls carried out at the Mercedes Benz service centre of Milan, and that it reached 42.000 km in 18 months. During the periods of inactivity of the car, the dealer has always offered Dr Masini a substitute car through the so called "vip service" facility. As a consequence of the numerous unpleasant events occurred, Mercedes Benz Milano has offered the following substitute cars:
- Mercedes E55 amg SW;
- Mercedes CLS 320 cdi (twice);
- Mercedes CL 500 penultimate series (consigned with lights malfunctioning);
- Mercedes R 320 cdi (3 times);
- Mercedes SLK 55 amg;
- Mercedes SL65 amg;
- Mercedes GL 450 (twice - by the way, the car presented problems when shutting the door; moreover, on occasion of the last “substitution”, because of an unpleasant smell inside the car, an immediate further change had to be asked for);
- Mercedes GLK 320 cdi (consigned with the window cleaner top up light on). It is therefore evident that, notwithstanding the courtesy of:
- the "vip service" staff represented by Mr Mario Cristofori and Ms Lara Bergamaschi;
- the “sales” staff represented by the Sales Manager Dr Marco Castiglioni and Mr Davide Longoni;
- the CEO of Mercedes Benz Milano, Dr Stephan Randack, who personally invited Dr Masini to sport and cultural initiatives organized by Mercedes Benz;
our Mercedes Benz S 65 AMG:
- does not fulfill the expectation of a 200.000,00 Euro worth car, being, furthermore, one of the leading models of the Mercedes Benz series;
- requires constant and frequent servicing which, despite the warranty coverage, causes long periods of inactivity, although the substitute car service has always been guaranteed;
- caused continuous material and moral inconvenience to me, crowned by Dr
Marco Castiglioni’s e-mail asserting that "My Assistance colleagues confirmed to me that, at present, the car fulfills all factory requirements pertaining to such model” (are 9 service interventions, therefore, Mercedes’ STANDARD!!!???).
In order to avoid a legal argument, in March 2009 the parties met and we were proposed:
- to buy the car back at an absolutely ridiculous and offensive value;
- to be offered another car, which we firmly refused, as we do not trust high range Mercedes cars and, given their offensive attitude, Mercedes Benz Milano’s Staff any longer.

:mad::mad:
 
#2 ·
Holy shit is all I can say:eek:
 
#8 ·
All I know is if my Distronic started acting up, it would affect my BAS Plus, my Parktronic and some other features. I would not be a happy camper at all... I would raise holy hell about it. My car costs a good 70 or so k less than his so I think he is within his rights.
 
#4 ·
I disagree. It's absolutely unacceptable to give the customer such a run-around. Given the problems weren't as severe but still the point is that one shouldn't have to go through and waste so much time especially on a flag-ship vehicle. What I can tell Masani68 is that the S-class isn't all that bad considering this is my third s-class and I never experienced any persistent issues (Perhaps by luck both of your cars were lemons). On my 08 S550, I've yet to take it back to the dealership for anything. It's works perfect!
 
#5 ·
The problems are relatively small but I would also certainly be pissed after buying a new car of any kind. There are always stories like this but for the most part I think Mercedes are very reliable. I am very sorry about your experience. If you did get a full refund and did want a S65 (which you probably dont) you might try buying one from a completely unrelated dealer, it is possible that dealer simply got a bad batch. There are some other pretty amazing sporty 4 doors out there though: The Bentley Continental Flying Spur Speed, Maserati quattroporte GT-S, Porsche Panamera( even though I think its really ugly), then there is my personal favorite the Aston Martin Rapide.
 
#6 ·
If this happened to my car on the second time I would stop using the stupid dynamic seats.

I have used them twice on my car. Don't like them and could care less if they worked or not.
 
#7 ·
Molto spiacente di sentire queste Notizie del S65 AMG ,(back to English ),Has the Mercedes Dealer changed the Main CPU or Control box of the Car , knowing Italy's servicing, i doubt this verry much, as those Parts are verry verry expensive .
Ciao
 
#13 ·
WOW what a nightmare. Here in the USA there is a Lemon Law, that if the vehicle is fixed for the same reason 3 times, it is a lemon. In some states it is 4 times.
A lemon is defended in court and forcers the manufacturer to take back the car and pay you the full plrice of the car tat you paid including all taxes - the prorated usage until the first date a problem was reported. This lemon law appies to cars less than 18 months old.
So, here in the USA, you would have been given ALL of your oney back + lawyer fees.
I don't know what the law is like in Italy (by the way I lived in Rome 6 years), but I am sure that you can get your money back, and you need to contact the main office in Germany, at the factory, and tell them that if they do not take the car back, you would call all the national newspapers and give them this juicy story to write about. Mercedes will give you your money back.

You posted an old stoy, I wonder how it went till now. Please send us an update.
 
#14 ·
The EU has strict consumer protection laws, but on the flipside, they are very hard to actually use in practice as an individual with a legitimate case.

As far as "calling the national newspapers go", there is a finance crisis, along with several countries in the EU, including Italy, having massive problems that are clogging up the paper as is. Under normal circumstances, no one would give a shit anyhow. Calling the papers is an American thing. There is no accountability in Germany, no customer service, and no one cares. In Germany, in every sector, if someone says they will call you back, expect to never hear from them ever again. And getting paid right, that's another matter altogether.

The OP should get the money back, without any doubt. What needs to be done to do such a thing is very tough.
 
#15 ·
I disagree with you 100%.
As long as Mercedes Benz has dealerships and engages in selling cars, there are customers who buy them. these customers can easily decide NOT to buy them, and creating enough noise could easily, and especially in this economy, could make them go to BMW or Audi, or a different dealer.
There are many things a smart person can do. A lawsuite, a demonstration in front of the dealer, a mailing list to with a nice report like what we have here could be acquired and reached to all the potential buyers in Milan.
I am sure that writing this blog here did not help MB sell S65s.
A lawsuit is ablolutely in place.

To just sit there and give up is not acceptable, especially in a depression. yes we are in an economic DEPRESSION.

also, perhaps we are missing information, perhaps the Dr who bought the car weighs 200Kg and the seat cant handle it (I am sure it is not the case, just joking)
 
#16 ·
There are many things a smart person can do. A lawsuite, a demonstration in front of the dealer, a mailing list to with a nice report like what we have here could be acquired and reached to all the potential buyers in Milan.
A demonstration will typically get one arrested. This is not the US.

Lawsuits in the EU are very hard to bring forth. We don't have contingency lawyers here. They also take forever, and typically, both parties will lose a lawsuit because the judge will side in between so the plaintiff never gets a full settlement, and the defendent never gets to make a full payout. This is coupled with the fact that the loser pays the expenses of the other side, and if their lawyers are very good, then you're in a worse position than before.

A report sent out in such a manner can also trigger a lawsuit, and a massive one, at that. One thing that is very easy to bring up here is defamation. Sorry to say, but Germans are pussies, and they badmouth Americans for lawsuits, but they fling defamation suits around left and right because they can't get over being made fun of sometimes. Defamation suits typically also work out for the plaintiff, along with legal fees.

Your assertion of a DEPRESSION in big letters is partly correct, however Germany is considered "shielded" from the worst of what's going on, and your assertions make you look foolish because for the most part, you're acting like MB's are still niche cars here and on top of that, you don't seem to project the economic situation from other parts of the world onto Germany. Sorry, but they are like Chevys and Hondas. Everywhere and in all classes. They can afford to ignore one customer, and do everyday. Guess what? People still buy this garbage because there will always be uninformed customers. Typically, the rich are the least informed.

A proceeding of some sort is in place, though we don't know to what level, and if there will be a settlement out of it, as named above.
 
#17 ·
With all due respect, I do not think that taking the loss is the only solution. There are many ways to hurt the dealer and MB without defamation. simply stating the facts, filtered correctly by a lawyer, could not be of ay danger. defamation is when you make up stuff.
Either way, I had BMW take back a car without lawyers (2006 750Li) and they gave me every cent back. I had the car 18 months and got all my money back, including the aftermarket chrome wheels I put on them.
it never hurts to reach nicely up there to management, you never know the reaction. I told them that I am a good customer, they saw the history, and they immediately reacted.
I know that MB has the A class, and that every idiot now drives one, but an S65 is still an S65. I think that a friendly approach to top management without lawyers should be the first line of action. But one needs to reach real top management where decision makers sit. If one was driving a Bclass I can see them not caring, but this car is their pride and they will not do the wong thing. I did it, and it worked.
Wither way, I do know that in Europe customer service is a joke, and I am aware of the selfishness of companies/people. in Europe money is the only incentive to make someone do anything.
Persistance is the answer in this case, and it is an uphill battle. not everyone can do it.