Well, being a new owner of a W124, I want to make sure everything is up to snuff. From what I have read, the vacuum pump (VP from here on out) is Achilles’ heel number one in these engines. My car has almost 260k miles on the clock, and while the brakes are not stiff, nor do I hear the supposed tell tale ticking, the concept of having the VP fail and catastrophically damage the engine doesn't sit well with me.
I have seen some folks write about using an electric pump and fabricobbling a block off plate. But I suspect they were only musings, and nothing ever came of them. This sounds great to me, but my concern here is that the transmission bases its shift strategy on the amount of vacuum present, which I suspect varies with RPM as the VP is directly linked. If this is not the case and the transmission simply needs to see a certain amount of vacuum to shift correctly then an electric pump fits the bill nicely, and I will simply retrofit one in with a relay, a fuse, and make a block off plate. Here is a link to an Amazon listing for a power brake booster vacuum pump for a slew of different turbo vehicles.
If the case is that the RPM variable VP performance is a necessity, my thought is to simply retrofit a belt driven vacuum pump like what comes on a 7.3 Powerstroke (aka T444E International Harvester). Here is a link for a 7.3 vacuum pump. They are very simple, the pulley just needs to engage the back of the belt well enough to spin over, and the vacuum lines would be rerouted. This would certainly be more involved but will also remove any possibility of the VP grenading the engine. Aside from the obvious "how do I make this fit and function", the other concern would be the 7.3 was designed to only ever see about 4.5k RPM (in engine braking) which is close-ish to the OM606 redline. The problem would be if the pump fails the first time it's over revved, then it's a poor solution.
Either of these options would make replacing the VP much simpler than in factory form. The upside of using a belt driven pump is that there are no electronics to fail, which I personally like, but often the simple solution is much easier to implement which makes it more tractable.
My preference is to absolutely remove the possibility of the VP dumping its innards into the engine. I, as I'm sure many others, would much prefer for my brakes to get heavy and trans to start hard shifting one day and just have to bolt on a new pump in 10 minutes without having the fear of the block spitting a rod or bending every valve in the head.
For the time being, is there an easy means of identifying if the pump has been replaced?
Thanks for reading! Hope someone can shed some light, and we can all get a safer solution to pulling vacuum.
I have seen some folks write about using an electric pump and fabricobbling a block off plate. But I suspect they were only musings, and nothing ever came of them. This sounds great to me, but my concern here is that the transmission bases its shift strategy on the amount of vacuum present, which I suspect varies with RPM as the VP is directly linked. If this is not the case and the transmission simply needs to see a certain amount of vacuum to shift correctly then an electric pump fits the bill nicely, and I will simply retrofit one in with a relay, a fuse, and make a block off plate. Here is a link to an Amazon listing for a power brake booster vacuum pump for a slew of different turbo vehicles.
If the case is that the RPM variable VP performance is a necessity, my thought is to simply retrofit a belt driven vacuum pump like what comes on a 7.3 Powerstroke (aka T444E International Harvester). Here is a link for a 7.3 vacuum pump. They are very simple, the pulley just needs to engage the back of the belt well enough to spin over, and the vacuum lines would be rerouted. This would certainly be more involved but will also remove any possibility of the VP grenading the engine. Aside from the obvious "how do I make this fit and function", the other concern would be the 7.3 was designed to only ever see about 4.5k RPM (in engine braking) which is close-ish to the OM606 redline. The problem would be if the pump fails the first time it's over revved, then it's a poor solution.
Either of these options would make replacing the VP much simpler than in factory form. The upside of using a belt driven pump is that there are no electronics to fail, which I personally like, but often the simple solution is much easier to implement which makes it more tractable.
My preference is to absolutely remove the possibility of the VP dumping its innards into the engine. I, as I'm sure many others, would much prefer for my brakes to get heavy and trans to start hard shifting one day and just have to bolt on a new pump in 10 minutes without having the fear of the block spitting a rod or bending every valve in the head.
For the time being, is there an easy means of identifying if the pump has been replaced?
Thanks for reading! Hope someone can shed some light, and we can all get a safer solution to pulling vacuum.