Mercedes-Benz Forum banner

diesel injector seal leak WARNING

111K views 22 replies 10 participants last post by  zacky zimba  
Yes, it appears common that removing a glow plug or injector from an OM648 engine is a very iffy proposition.

I haven't studied WIS closely enough to determine whether Mercedes approves helicoils and such, but it's clear there's a LOT of pressure to hold.

Were I having a dealer make this repair under warranty I'd ask them to show me Mercedes approval, i.e. not trusting their local assumed knowledge, and if they couldn't show it to me I'd demand a new cylinder head under warranty should removing an injector or glow plug cause stripped threads.

Beru, BTW, has a publication I've seen referenced on the VW TDI forum regarding removing glow plugs. It lists a maximum torque feasible (before the glow plug breaks) and I think offers some more tips, too.
 
More likely new cylinder head than new engine.

I guess it's news to some, but rich people seldom get screwed. The notion of "stealership" with respect to Mercedes is senseless. Look to the likes of Toyota for that.
 
Kajtek, GREAT post. A word of caution when using previously torqued bolts. It is just about universal that bolts that are torqued to a minimal value then turned a specified number of degrees are ONE TIME ONLY USE BOLTS. Do NOT reuse for this application. If reused they are VERY subject to fatigue failure. The original load applied (by turning 90 degrees after torquing) stretches the bolt past the yield point. It does not recover. Stretching it again puts it too far past yield and, if then cyclic loaded to design load, has a high probability of failing by fatigue.
Of course Mercedes WIS always specifies whether a bolt requires replacement.

Attempting any sort of repair without it seems pretty risky.