Mercedes-Benz Forum banner

1 - 6 of 6 Posts
G

·
Discussion Starter #1
Hey guys i need all of your opinions. I am getting a used CLK soon. I want to know what you would rahter have, a 1999 CLK 430, or a 2000 CLK 320. The mileage can be no more than 50,000. Im missing some real good technology with the 99, but if its possible i would put the multifunction steering wheel on, is that possible. Also can i buy the integrated turn signals for the mirror, if i do that do they paint over where the old turn signals were. Anyone's input would be great thanks.
 
G

·
Discussion Starter #2
I've owned both a 2001 320 and a 2002 430. I really can't say which car I like best. The 430 has more grunt, but the 320 is a good performer as well. Thet 320 has a much smoother ride, but the 430 handles better. I got 28 mpg with my 320 vs 23 with my 430. For comfort, and gas mileage my hands down choice would be a 320, but the grin factor when you mash it on a 430 is why I drive one. <br>
<br>
If you want the 2k features there is no debate get the 2k 320. Don't let the 60 horses sway ya.
 
G

·
Discussion Starter #3
Get the 2000....trust me a 430 is nothing compared.......

430 is nothing compared to the technology, looks and facelift of the 2000. get the 2000 trust me.
 
G

·
Discussion Starter #5
but.....

What bout the body kit, on the 430, that looks so good, thats half the reason why i like it so much, and the handeling, and wheels, and tires. everything. Does anyone want to sell me their 2000+ $30 for 27 grand!
 
G

·
Discussion Starter #6
Tim,<br> <br> If you haven't bought a car yet my friend here in Canada is selling his 99 Silver 430 coupe. It's really nice and has been modified to 340hp. The car is great because it is a sleeper, it look like a stock 430 but runs like a 55. If you want more just email me, I'm about to post it on Ebay so just let me know. The car has been modified by MBK and has 48000 miles.<br> <br> Thanks and good luck in your hunt<br> <br> dan
 
1 - 6 of 6 Posts
Top