Mercedes-Benz Forum banner
1 - 20 of 30 Posts

· Premium Member
M120, M119, W126*2 + Silver Avantgarde wagon
Joined
·
4,889 Posts
Discussion Starter · #1 · (Edited)
Ok gang, I've been doing some researching into various models of S class and E class for safety. And would appreciate your thoughts and comments.

Beginning with the W126 what is remarkable about these 2 videos is that there is almost no intrusion into the passenger cell compartment at 70 mph head on crashes. I have personal experience of how safe the W126 420 SEL is. It likely saved my life many years ago, but I understand its SRS systems and crumple zones are not as up to date as the cars sold in the 2000's.:-




So we know that the W126 is very safe, and as for the W140 many of you will have seen this video:-


But you may not have seen this video of an W140 taking out a VAN when the 140 is side impacted by the VAN...


or these *allegedly* of a W140 crash at 180 km/h - again the passenger cell remains intact




So here is a BenzWorld thread to an E class wagon being rear ended at 60 mph plus, the Mercedes W210 Wagon owner walked away, but the guy who hit him was life flighted to hospital: -

http://www.benzworld.org/forums/w210-e-class/1278974-my-wagons-gone-check-out-hit.html

In a rear-ender with all the crumple space behind you in the W210 wagon, you are going to be very, very safe I think and that thread proves it...

But in a side impact the E320 wagon does not fair so well... although this as an early model year:-


Whereas in the last model year of 2002 of the W210 you can see the side impact is much improved...


Similarly here you can see the diver's door stays shut in the 2000 - 2002 E class...


Whereas in the 1996 - 1999 E class it does not:-



Interesting huh? So it's not just later model years are more reliable with Mercedes but they are likely safer too... ( as a rule)


So where do we go from there?

Well I looked at the BMW 7 series E65/66 as you can get a similar vintage to the last MY of the W210 2002 E class, as the E65 begins in 2003, and the videos show it is probably much safer, especially in side impacts - look at the dummies head + plus it has knee airbags...


Yet my due diligence revealed that the E65 is much more of a nightmare car in terms of getting it reliably on the road - valve seals, transmission seals, alternator bracket gasket seal - which together will cost a fortune... So safer yes, but once you factor in the cost of making it reliable it becomes the same price as a used W221...

And the S class W221 seems the best of all to me prior to say 2012 - no surprises given how technology MB and others' marches on - just look how good it is in the side impact part of this video. Note how the B pillar dents the side impact machine!!! Go to 0' 43"


And even in the E class from around the same time period it is better - go to 1' 18" - but no where near as good as the W221, for example in the same side impact test the W221 side window does not even break.


Plus the W221, if I understand it correctly has the ability to avoid accidents for you as well and has an A pillar head air bag as well as curtain head bags...

So here is a compilation video from MB of the various S class cars crash tests: -



Now a word of caution based on my own thoughts and what I have been told. Speed:- People in the know suggest for every 10kmph the impact doubles...

Obvious concept, but bear that in mind especially in poor driving conditions or when you have idiots out drunk or high on drugs. One poster I know from the Ferrari forum lost his partner, and was very seriously hurt himself, because someone high on Marijuana crossed the central reservation and hit his vintage Porsche 356. He was not speeding at all, but an older car did not help him at all...

My only other thought is what about very high speed accidents? I ask experts to assist here...

Yes, at low to medium speed accidents the W221 is likely very safe and the E65 Beemer is safer than the W210 and the W210 is safer than even the earlier s class, but what about very high speed accidents: -

But the Mercedes Benz S class W126 and W140 are TANKS. No question about it. Look at the very first video - 60 mph head on it to another car in a W126 - they all survived. Would a W221 do that? I'm not so sure...

So let's look at the one example of a head on W140 crash into a concrete pillar at 80 - 90 mph - Princess Diana's crash. The British Intelligence officer in the passenger seat was the only person, reportedly, wearing his seat belt and he survived.

Here are some pictures of the W140 car


So the one remaining question I have if there are any experts on the forum or folks who have seen many different s classes crashed cars come in - is the W221 as safe as the old tanks at speeds above 70 mph?

TANK vs modern crumple zones... I wonder if MB designs the cars to be best in the crashes we most normally or most frequently have? It would make sense from a business perspective? (i.e. at or below the speed limits)

If you have any information to address this please do share. My gut says you might ("might") be better of in a 1998 or 1999 W140 at a super high speed accident on the Autobhan, but by W221 and W222 probably not? (FYI - from what I have been told the W220 is not as safe, not as well made either)

Lastly, the 2017 Volvo crash tests of their S90 and XC90 I have looked at are incredible. Far less internal injuries likely in offset frontal impact test.

Drive safe and I hope you find these videos interesting and helpful to do just that drive safe & enjoy Life! :grin
 

· Premium Member
'97 CL600
Joined
·
3,256 Posts
Thanks for taking the time to put this together with the videos and the comments. Accidents here in Kalifornia where I live are mostly roll overs on I-10. There is a section East of here that has taken out 10 people in the last 10 months. The bulk of them lost control, rolled their mini vans, were ejected (not belted in) at 60-80mph. In the metropolitan areas of Los Angeles, you get more head-on collisions and hit and runs from the illegals that don't have insurance or a drivers license. You had better have a healthy "non insured motorist" adder on your policy or you are playing Russian Roulette.
Anziani
 

· Premium Member
M120, M119, W126*2 + Silver Avantgarde wagon
Joined
·
4,889 Posts
Discussion Starter · #3 ·
Thanks for taking the time to put this together with the videos and the comments. Accidents here in Kalifornia where I live are mostly roll overs on I-10. There is a section East of here that has taken out 10 people in the last 10 months. The bulk of them lost control, rolled their mini vans, were ejected (not belted in) at 60-80mph. In the metropolitan areas of Los Angeles, you get more head-on collisions and hit and runs from the illegals that don't have insurance or a drivers license. You had better have a healthy "non insured motorist" adder on your policy or you are playing Russian Roulette.
Anziani
Thanks my friend - yes learning all of this took weeks... but it was very interesting and potentially can save lives.

You make a good point about uninsured motorists...

I'm now watching videos of the Audi Q7 (no deaths ever in that car according to Audi) and the Volvo XC90 and the Range Rover...

Isn't it stunning how our cars (the M120 140's) are real TANKS - way less collapsible than W221 - but perhaps that can be a good thing or a bad thing depending on the type of accident.

Just FYi...

In terms of price point the 98/99 V12 W140 cost 138,000 USD. Well at say an assumed 4% inflation over 20 years if you wanted to buy a new 2018 model car - your equivalent budget is $302,375...

So buy a Bentley SUV with $50k left over, or a Bentley Mulsanne or save up for a Bentley Mulsanne Long wheelbase...

:nerd :angel
 

· Premium Member
M120, M119, W126*2 + Silver Avantgarde wagon
Joined
·
4,889 Posts
Discussion Starter · #4 ·
New Videos - W126 safer?

This is pretty interesting - as after I saw that W126 video of hitting a series of cars at 70 mph and being fine I did some more digging...

Look at the roll over footage in this - the A pillars appear or seem to withstand the roll over better than the w140 videos above

go to 6' 36"



And this is interesting too...


:smile
 

· Registered
1999 Mercedes-Benz S420 / 2012 Mercedes-Benz GL450
Joined
·
544 Posts
Ok gang, I've been doing some researching into various models of S class and E class for safety. And would appreciate your thoughts and comments.

Beginning with the W126 what is remarkable about these 2 videos is that there is almost no intrusion into the passenger cell compartment at 70 mph head on crashes. I have personal experience of how safe the W126 420 SEL is. It likely saved my life many years ago, but I understand its SRS systems and crumple zones are not as up to date as the cars sold in the 2000's.:-

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rvrkngZai30

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CSEl2ueCATs&t=9s

Compare that to this old Jaguar at a 65 mph crash

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V4_UDyT1wnA


So we know that the W126 is very safe, and as for the W140 many of you will have seen this video:-

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eh9biNZ__4c

But you may not have seen this video of an W140 taking out a VAN when the 140 is side impacted by the VAN...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WR0c9wmPMmI

or these *allegedly* of a W140 crash at 180 km/h - again the passenger cell remains intact

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VtUojp6EIps

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8wMh5bNKzBI


So here is a BenzWorld thread to an E class wagon being rear ended at 60 mph plus, the Mercedes W210 Wagon owner walked away, but the guy who hit him was life flighted to hospital: -

http://www.benzworld.org/forums/w210-e-class/1278974-my-wagons-gone-check-out-hit.html

In a rear-ender with all the crumple space behind you in the W210 wagon, you are going to be very, very safe I think and that thread proves it...

But in a side impact the E320 wagon does not fair so well... although this as an early model year:-

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_rE9qKJ3lnQ

Whereas in the last model year of 2002 of the W210 you can see the side impact is much improved...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gyFVsSiRDfg

Similarly here you can see the diver's door stays shut in the 2000 - 2002 E class...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EGU3haqhKn4

Whereas in the 1996 - 1999 E class it does not:-

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HWx-AXfwdZc

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qvJmNbQ2W7c

Interesting huh? So it's not just later model years are more reliable with Mercedes but they are likely safer too... ( as a rule)


So where do we go from there?

Well I looked at the BMW 7 series E65/66 as you can get a similar vintage to the last MY of the W210 2002 E class, as the E65 begins in 2003, and the videos show it is probably much safer, especially in side impacts - look at the dummies head + plus it has knee airbags...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iI10bP4uzpQ

Yet my due diligence revealed that the E65 is much more of a nightmare car in terms of getting it reliably on the road - valve seals, transmission seals, alternator bracket gasket seal - which together will cost a fortune... So safer yes, but once you factor in the cost of making it reliable it becomes the same price as a used W221...

And the S class W221 seems the best of all to me prior to say 2012 - no surprises given how technology MB and others' marches on - just look how good it is in the side impact part of this video. Note how the B pillar dents the side impact machine!!! Go to 0' 43"

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XNCGRaQrDPk

And even in the E class from around the same time period it is better - go to 1' 18" - but no where near as good as the W221, for example in the same side impact test the W221 side window does not even break.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EO8XoOgf3o0

Plus the W221, if I understand it correctly has the ability to avoid accidents for you as well and has an A pillar head air bag as well as curtain head bags...

So here is a compilation video from MB of the various S class cars crash tests: -

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3Hk6y8avBI8


Now a word of caution based on my own thoughts and what I have been told. Speed:- People in the know suggest for every 10kmph the impact doubles...

Obvious concept, but bear that in mind especially in poor driving conditions or when you have idiots out drunk or high on drugs. One poster I know from the Ferrari forum lost his partner, and was very seriously hurt himself, because someone high on Marijuana crossed the central reservation and hit his vintage Porsche 356. He was not speeding at all, but an older car did not help him at all...

My only other thought is what about very high speed accidents? I ask experts to assist here...

Yes, at low to medium speed accidents the W221 is likely very safe and the E65 Beemer is safer than the W210 and the W210 is safer than even the earlier s class, but what about very high speed accidents: -

But the Mercedes Benz S class W126 and W140 are TANKS. No question about it. Look at the very first video - 60 mph head on it to another car in a W126 - they all survived. Would a W221 do that? I'm not so sure...

So let's look at the one example of a head on W140 crash into a concrete pillar at 80 - 90 mph - Princess Diana's crash. The British Intelligence officer in the passenger seat was the only person, reportedly, wearing his seat belt and he survived.

Here are some pictures of the W140 car
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c8KCBHQ3pxs


So the one remaining question I have if there are any experts on the forum or folks who have seen many different s classes crashed cars come in - is the W221 as safe as the old tanks at speeds above 70 mph?

TANK vs modern crumple zones... I wonder if MB designs the cars to be best in the crashes we most normally or most frequently have? It would make sense from a business perspective? (i.e. at or below the speed limits)

If you have any information to address this please do share. My gut says you might ("might") be better of in a 1998 or 1999 W140 at a super high speed accident on the Autobhan, but by W221 and W222 probably not? (FYI - from what I have been told the W220 is not as safe, not as well made either)

Lastly, the 2017 Volvo crash tests of their S90 and XC90 I have looked at are incredible. Far less internal injuries likely in offset frontal impact test.

Drive safe and I hope you find these videos interesting and helpful to do just that drive safe & enjoy Life! :grin
One more video
 

· Registered
1997 S500V, 1999 S500 grand edition, 2006 s65 amg
Joined
·
7,370 Posts
The w140 is really safe i had a 300se that got totalled hit in the quarter panel no serious injuries. W220 is really safe as well after my recent accident i only fractured thumb, wrist, 4 ribs, and got the mercedes logo cut into my arm but the impact was huge 35-40mph head on collision the passet that hit me bent his frame 45 degrees. My passenger side doors did not open hood didnt open block was cracked and the car was toast but saved the driver the guys in the vw were beat and the guy could barely move and dash was bloodly.
 

Attachments

· Premium Member
M120, M119, W126*2 + Silver Avantgarde wagon
Joined
·
4,889 Posts
Discussion Starter · #7 ·
The w140 is really safe i had a 300se that got totalled hit in the quarter panel no serious injuries. W220 is really safe as well after my recent accident i only fractured thumb, wrist, 4 ribs, and got the mercedes logo cut into my arm but the impact was huge 35-40mph head on collision the passet that hit me bent his frame 45 degrees. My passenger side doors did not open hood didnt open block was cracked and the car was toast but saved the driver the guys in the vw were beat and the guy could barely move and dash was bloodly.
Thanks for that buddy...

So the question I have for you, based on your extensive s class crash research :devil :grin :x - what car would you rather be in if a drunk driver in a pick up or SUV was going to hit you at 40 - 50mph - the tank 140 or the air bag'd 220...???

I would be very interested in your preference, my friend?

Or would you rather be in a big e class station wagon?
 

· Registered
1997 S500V, 1999 S500 grand edition, 2006 s65 amg
Joined
·
7,370 Posts
At all depends Richard. If its t bone i would say w220 more side support if its head on the w140 is a tank. The airbag is thing that fractured all of my bones by the way. To be comoletely honest both are extremely safe cars. My cousin was in a huge accident in a w210 back in 2008 and he was okay only fractured nose from the airbag. My close friend was t boned by a drunk old lady in a w211 back in December and he is now okay. So i can say mercedes are pretty safe.
 

· Moderator
1995 S420, 1995 SL320, 2008 Aston Martin Vantage, 2000 Land Rover Discovery II
Joined
·
2,351 Posts
Modern cars today, especially high-end cars like the S Class or 7 Series are extraordinarily safe. Like, an order of magnitude beyond what we'd find in the W140.

That's not to say that W140 is unsafe, or that it wouldn't do as well or better than most cars currently on the road, but the fact is that crash test standards have become so much more strict and the technology has improved so much that it's almost apples to oranges at this point, compared to what was tested in the 1990s.

I would really like to see a side-by-side crash test comparison with a modern S Class though, just to quantify exactly where the differences are.
 

· Registered
1997 S500V, 1999 S500 grand edition, 2006 s65 amg
Joined
·
7,370 Posts
The newer cars have more crumble zones. So they absorb impact better. I like seat belts but hate airbags. Its the airbag that did the damage to wrist, thumb and other hand. All the seat belt will do is fracture ribs. I attached a picture of my arm 3 weeks after my accident and the mercedes logo on the airbag that puctured through my flesh it gave me a severe infection
 

Attachments

· Premium Member
MY97 S320
Joined
·
3,211 Posts
Casual armchair observer comments:

A heavy car with crumple zones to pass crash test standards will use lighter cars crumple zones in a real world impact, you see exactly this in that pile up test with the W126 carving everything up. If you drive a W140, you kind of a have more responsibility on the road, knowing that if anyone gets in the way of any of your driving errors, they are going to have a very bad day.

I wouldn't want to be inside a 140 when someone wanted to do a side intrusion test. MY97+ have front door side (torso) airbags, not curtain (head) airbags, passengers have nothing on any model.

Front, rear & rollover look to be excellent even by todays standards, sheer size helps here with more distance between the outside and any passengers, more distance for deceleration, but no side/curtain is an obvious major weak spot.

If I wanted to upgrade my safety, I'd jump to a W221.

Ideally the physical size of a 140 will scare away any potential threats without actually having to engage metal on metal haha.
 

· Premium Member
M120, M119, W126*2 + Silver Avantgarde wagon
Joined
·
4,889 Posts
Discussion Starter · #14 · (Edited)
WOW

Just wow.

I'm not going out any more...

However..., that side impact in this video - is very impressive for a 199x S class.
Thank you for sharing that Joe - that helps me make a decision.

 

· Premium Member
M120, M119, W126*2 + Silver Avantgarde wagon
Joined
·
4,889 Posts
Discussion Starter · #15 ·
The newer cars have more crumble zones. So they absorb impact better. I like seat belts but hate airbags. Its the airbag that did the damage to wrist, thumb and other hand. All the seat belt will do is fracture ribs. I attached a picture of my arm 3 weeks after my accident and the mercedes logo on the airbag that puctured through my flesh it gave me a severe infection
Thanks for sharing and get well soon buddy...

Your crash was in a 220, right?

I am wondering if the W221 and W222 have safer air bags as aren't they all two stage, whereas the 220 was just one stage air bag right? Or, am I wrong?

Those Maybach seat belt bags are impressive too...
 

· Registered
1997 S500V, 1999 S500 grand edition, 2006 s65 amg
Joined
·
7,370 Posts
Those pictures all high speed crashes. On the w221 people assume its safer but my cousin got into a huge wreck 3 years ago and he still has lower back pain his car lost traction and slipped into the wall in reverse. Now my accident in w220 (04 s55 amg) was 35mph head on crash with the other party going atleast 40mph and it doesnt look as severe as the crashes in the pictures so you know those crashes are high speed crashes. The air bags are single stage if i remember correctly (one charge pack in the air bag). The air bag caused me to black out for a few seconds and fractured 6 bones. Till this day my wrist/thumb hurts when i am counting pills in the pharmacy not to mention accidents do give ptsd. When i drove the first time after my accident it was horrible i would unintentionally slam on the brakes before crossing intersections. It really takes a toll on your well being regardless of physical harm of the accident. I have seen tons of accidents in person but none look as dramitic as the ones you will find online. Esspecially the accidents in Russia, middle east and parts of europe. I know the salvage rules are different and lots of people in russia buy salvage cars from the US and they have mickey mouse shops fix the cars and when the person is in a accident lives are at risk. Armenia is known for that too. Its literally half the price to import a salvage and get a cheap shop to fix the body for dirt cheap people dont care for the cars structure or safety features as long as it looks like clean mercedes
 

· Banned
n/a
Joined
·
1,726 Posts
I have seen tons of accidents in person but none look as dramitic as the ones you will find online. Esspecially the accidents in Russia, middle east and parts of europe.
Princess Diana, RIP (the 20th 20th anniversary of Diana's death is fast approaching -- August 31)

Ruthin exhibition marks 20th anniversary of Diana's death - BBC News

It is still debated whether it was a conspiracy, driver error, or the S280 pool car provided by the Ritz Carlton was a "rebuilt wreck"



New reports claim the car "had been written off and rebuilt"

Car Princess Diana died in was 'death trap' that had been written off and rebuilt, according to new report

Bottom line, safe or not, we are all children to God and what car we ride in probably has little effect on the outcome of a wreck.

Steve
 

· Registered
1997 S500V, 1999 S500 grand edition, 2006 s65 amg
Joined
·
7,370 Posts
I am far from religious but believe in a god. I can say that day god smiled at me because on my way back from work i use to not wear a seat belt but i literally put on my seat belt 1 street before the accident (inner feeling said wear a seat belt) and i was 2 streets away from home. i am just glade there was a young kid on the block that helpped me out of my car he was 17 years old and he actually broke his phone helping me and i offered to get him a new one but he said its okay dont worry. I am happy for the monk witnesses they helped to prove my innocences in the accident (happened right next to a monk temple).
 

· Premium Member
M120, M119, W126*2 + Silver Avantgarde wagon
Joined
·
4,889 Posts
Discussion Starter · #19 ·
I am far from religious but believe in a god. I can say that day god smiled at me because on my way back from work i use to not wear a seat belt but i literally put on my seat belt 1 street before the accident (inner feeling said wear a seat belt) and i was 2 streets away from home. i am just glade there was a young kid on the block that helpped me out of my car he was 17 years old and he actually broke his phone helping me and i offered to get him a new one but he said its okay dont worry. I am happy for the monk witnesses they helped to prove my innocences in the accident (happened right next to a monk temple).
Legendary post from great person... :bowdown:

Thank you :thumbsup:
 
1 - 20 of 30 Posts
This is an older thread, you may not receive a response, and could be reviving an old thread. Please consider creating a new thread.
Top