Mercedes-Benz Forum banner
1 - 6 of 6 Posts

· Registered
2002 SLK 32 AMG, bone stock. 1987 190E 2.3-16 valve (destroyed). 2005 E320 new toy.
Joined
·
14,798 Posts
The weight of the SLK 32 engine is significantly more then that of the 230K. It would be illogical to expect that the springs would fit as designed, If you want to do that just to get the better suspension, look into Eibach springs the price wouldn't be much different then '32 springs from MB anyway............ Knowing what MB charges, Eibach will probably be less expensive to boot... :)
 

· Registered
Joined
·
58 Posts
Discussion Starter · #5 ·
Bruce R. said:
The weight of the SLK 32 engine is significantly more then that of the 230K. It would be illogical to expect that the springs would fit as designed, If you want to do that just to get the better suspension, look into Eibach springs the price wouldn't be much different then '32 springs from MB anyway............ Knowing what MB charges, Eibach will probably be less expensive to boot... :)
I already have AMG springs I was assuming they will give the car a lower look I didn't realize it was because the SLK32 engine is heavier.:confused:
 

· BenzWorld R170 SLK Host
2002 SLK32 AMG
Joined
·
2,546 Posts
I've still have a set of new R170 AMG springs for sale (these are the accessory springs for the SLK230, not SLK32 springs). See my post in the "SLK parts for sale, trade & wanted" thread.
 
1 - 6 of 6 Posts
This is an older thread, you may not receive a response, and could be reviving an old thread. Please consider creating a new thread.
Top