PIctures . . .
I thought the exact same thing . . . I thought for sure it would be an S600, but I just thought I would ask to make sure.The 280? You'd think a princess would have the best one, not the cheapest... I automatically assumed the 600. Makes me wonder with all that front end damage and engine crunching, what would have been the outcome if the w140 was the 600... The 280 must be reeeaaaally slow!
Yeah, I just read that as well. . . I think the MB was owned by a limousine company owned by the hotel. But still, one would think that she would have a more expensive car to ride in . . .Despite everyone's assuption (including my own) that she would be riding in a 600. It wasn't her car! I have read somewhere that the car was owned by the hotel, hense the 280!
No, I am in no way dissing the S280! (In fact, we have the 300SE, the smallest available W140 to the US). I just thought that royalty would ride in the most expensive model, regardless of whether it is better or not. . . (just because it costs moreyou guys make me laugh
There is nothing wrong with the S280, how can you diss it without even having ever driven one.
It was never released in N.America because the gas guzzling mentality there is that anything less than 3000cc is underpowered, hence benz thought it would not sell
I really dont understand why you need large engines as you cant even drive over 55mph
Most people here dont like extreme engineering in automobiles. Thats the reason cadillacs, buicks, corvettes and lincolns still sell high.you guys make me laugh
There is nothing wrong with the S280, how can you diss it without even having ever driven one.
It was never released in N.America because the gas guzzling mentality there is that anything less than 3000cc is underpowered, hence benz thought it would not sell
I really dont understand why you need large engines as you cant even drive over 55mph
Good point ///S320! That's what I really hate about American cars . . . they may have a big engine and lots of power, but they are terribly inefficient. It goes along with the whole North American mentality that "bigger is better".Most people here dont like extreme engineering in automobiles. Thats the reason cadillacs, buicks, corvettes and lincolns still sell high.
If they were to sell S280 here, people would have said: Damn, its the same engine from a c-class put on an s-class, it must be underpowered for a vehicle so heavy. (Thats what people say to me when they find out that 3.2 is an I6 not a V8)
Here is an example of a small, well engineered engine beating the crap out of a large gas guzzling engine:
Porsche 911 Turbo Vs. Crovette ZO6
///S320
Yeah, everybody would always like more power . . .Well, I'll tell you why we like power. Its not that we're going to make daily top speed runs in our cars, its having that power on demand that we like. I don't want to have to wait 15 seconds for a small engine to make enough power to pass grandma on the freeway, I want to get around quickly, and I DO NOT go the speed limit. I dont want to have to press 80% throttle to get my car accelerating fast enough for my liking, thats why I have V8s, I love torque. I think the 280 is WAAAAAY too small of an engine for such a massive car as the S class.
Hi Barry,Dear Gill:
I know why you can not understand the North American desire for powerful engines. You live in London; I have been there putting around at 5 mph, in incredible traffic. When you live in a tiny country where the highest mountain is the size of an ant hill, you don't understand the concept of a huge country with huge mountains that requires climbing power.
By the way I am not dissing G.B. my forfathers came from Glen Coe at the base of Ben Nevis.
Barry
Lucky Europeans [I have driven my car at well over 130mph legally.