Mercedes-Benz Forum banner

1 - 20 of 28 Posts

·
Registered
'95 E300 DIESEL, '91 600SEL, '92 600SEL
Joined
·
17,373 Posts
The rear muffler appears to be hanging loose due to broken muffler hangers. Should be fixed to avoid the exhaust from breaking apart due to stress.

As far as the "stance" or "looks", no comment, other than the ride quality is probably far from what SLS was designed to be or do.
 

·
Registered
'04 G500, '00 E55 AMG, '90 300TE 4Matic, '82 240D
Joined
·
1,951 Posts
I am madly in love with BBS RS wheels, but the stretched tires and stance must be personal taste..
 

·
Registered
91 500SL 37k,90 300SE sold, 91 300E sold , 92 300E137k ,02 Kia Sedona ,I know..... its a Mini van.
Joined
·
8,143 Posts
Eventually some one will change those wheels,they look like their tilted,tops in,rubbing?
 

·
Registered
1993 300E, 2003 996 Turbo X50
Joined
·
624 Posts
Think he needs an alignment, rear camber is a touch out.

Never understood the jacked up camber and stretched tires thing. some vw owners are big into that too, I hate working on those cars.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
70 Posts
i know its a personal taste thing, but to me, it just looks wrong. much better lowered a little (if you want) but not "slammed to the floor".

there is a fine-line as to going too far and ruining a car's look. i feel IMHO you crossed it.

sorry! each to their own. if you like it, then enjoy it
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
231 Posts
gaaahhh, I come here to NOT see that hellaflush stance crap!
Its a horrible horrible trend, I think I would rather see altezza tail lights and fart cans on everything again before this!
 

·
Registered
2008 E350 4M, 2016 Audi Allroad, 2019 Audi Q5
Joined
·
5,447 Posts
If they spent as much time and money doing that as opposed to fixing the cracked front bumper...

JIMO :)
 

·
Cruise Control
'87 300TD/'90 300D/'94 Quattro/'89 Vanagon TDI/'01 EV Weekender VR6
Joined
·
52,233 Posts
Having wrenched on cars for a living, I find it hard to look upon something like that without just shaking my head. It's neither safe nor sustainable as a functioning vehicle
 

·
Registered
91 500SL 37k,90 300SE sold, 91 300E sold , 92 300E137k ,02 Kia Sedona ,I know..... its a Mini van.
Joined
·
8,143 Posts
So one of the young kids at work slamed his Honda Accord down to the ground ,just like that! as I was walking into the store ,noticed he had masking tape around the outer radius of the tires? asked Chris,why is there tape on your tires? because their rubbing around the fender wells! uhhhh! speechless!
Cars are engineered and lot of time and money is spent for the correct combination of tires and wheels,once you mess with that combination,all kinds of problems can arise! ask me how I know this!
But wouldn't it be nice to cruise old town with that awesome slamming wagon! we could just wave to all the chick's begging for a ride to TJ!
 

·
Registered
1991 Mercedes Benz 300E, 179K, stock, daily driver
Joined
·
1,689 Posts
i know its a personal taste thing, but to me, it just looks wrong. much better lowered a little (if you want) but not "slammed to the floor".

there is a fine-line as to going too far and ruining a car's look. i feel IMHO you crossed it.

sorry! each to their own. if you like it, then enjoy it
+1 looks disgusting
 

·
Registered
1991 Mercedes Benz 300E, 179K, stock, daily driver
Joined
·
1,689 Posts
So one of the young kids at work slamed his Honda Accord down to the ground ,just like that! as I was walking into the store ,noticed he had masking tape around the outer radius of the tires? asked Chris,why is there tape on your tires? because their rubbing around the fender wells! uhhhh! speechless!
Damn kids, hahaha I'm a kid and I have better taste but like its been said before it's personal taste period. Also my brother hangs around with people that just have so much passion for Hondas... Its a HONDA :eek:
 

·
Registered
'95 E300 DIESEL, '91 600SEL, '92 600SEL
Joined
·
17,373 Posts
The Honda (Acura) NSX wasn't a bad looking car, but it was a slow car (compared to the exotics it was competing against) even when it was new.
 

·
Registered
E550W4
Joined
·
1,879 Posts
The Honda (Acura) NSX wasn't a bad looking car, but it was a slow car (compared to the exotics it was competing against) even when it was new.
Actually it wasn't.

NSX 0-60: 5.2 to 4.8 seconds (3.0 litre vs. 3.2 litre engine)
Ferrari 348 0-60: 5.4 seconds

Not bad considering the Ferrari was about $117,000.00 and extremely unreliable and expensive to maintain. The NSX was about $60,000-$90,000 over its lifetime and cost a few hundred dollars a year to maintain.

I have a friend who has a 1991 NSX and his vehicle has over 120,000 miles on it and the clutch has been replaced once. Car is as reliable as a Honda Civic and still is very fast.

The NSX was also the first aluminum bodied car.

If there's any company that can match Mercedes-Benz for engineering skill, the number of patents, and safety it's Honda.

The thing holding Honda back is how cautious they are because if they followed Mr. Honda's passion for racing they would kick the asses of everybody.
 

·
Registered
91 500SL 37k,90 300SE sold, 91 300E sold , 92 300E137k ,02 Kia Sedona ,I know..... its a Mini van.
Joined
·
8,143 Posts
Nothing wrong with Honda cars,last forever and reliable,but boring,your just part of the crowd,and over priced!
 

·
Registered
'95 E300 DIESEL, '91 600SEL, '92 600SEL
Joined
·
17,373 Posts
Actually it wasn't.

NSX 0-60: 5.2 to 4.8 seconds (3.0 litre vs. 3.2 litre engine)
Ferrari 348 0-60: 5.4 seconds
When new, a 1986 Ford RS200 EVO did 0-60 in 2.1 seconds from a measly 2.1L turbo 4 cylinder, and that's with all wheel drive.

That's blistering fast, even today.

The main issue, IMO, with the NSX is that being a Honda with VTEC until the revs are high enough the engine feels lazy and slow.
 
1 - 20 of 28 Posts
Top