I posted this recently in the Wheel/Rim Tire thread, but think not as many people read that as the general posts (like me). I've re-worded just a few things for better explanation.
Any theories as to why the rears would have worn so quickly?
__________________
(Added from orig post)
Can anyone recommend any other Michelins?
__________________
I put 4 new 225/60R16 of these on in Spring of 2010 at 204K mi after buying the car (tires not bought at dealer, FYI). Supposed to be 65,000 mi tires. I also had the dealer do all-wheel alignment. They said this is probably the last time to do a good alignment with the worn parts in front. So, I had the front suspension all replaced around 209-210K mi, and re-aligned, but dealer said the rear suspension still looks good enough/okay as far as suspension parts are concerned. All tires have worn pretty evenly, but the rears have just worn faster. Now on Sep 2012, at 219K mi - diff of just 15K.
I just noticed this earlier this week. The rear's have worn down to almost nothing. I've kept the pressures at the recommended values in the manual/gas cap, like 28F/32R...I've checked them each month. I should have been looking at the tread more often, but wasn't expecting them to wear down so quickly.
Using the US Lincoln penny test:
-- right rear is the worst - next to the rim of the penny is the "In God..." motto, and most of the letters' height is visible.
-- left rear - about half the motto is visible.
-- both fronts - tread is even with where the hair meets the forehead...can't really see the hair much.
So, I can see getting another 10-15K on the fronts, but why would the rears wear so quickly ?
Also, any other Michelin recommendations? I've read around here, but not a lot of "Michelin" hits.
The only Michelins the tire place has are : PRIMACY MXV4 RRBL 98H and 98V (Both Touring-type), and PILOT SPT AS+ 98W (Ultra-Hi Perf Sport).
The Symmetry's are Pax Type.
Which type should be used with the 140's? Of course, mine is "lighter" than the 420/500/600 models.
Thx - Dave H.
(ps: bomb10177 had already made some good comments, even suggesting I've been spinning the tires too much...with my 6-cyl...I had to tell him those are just the standard rumors about the 6's)
Any theories as to why the rears would have worn so quickly?
__________________
(Added from orig post)
Can anyone recommend any other Michelins?
__________________
I put 4 new 225/60R16 of these on in Spring of 2010 at 204K mi after buying the car (tires not bought at dealer, FYI). Supposed to be 65,000 mi tires. I also had the dealer do all-wheel alignment. They said this is probably the last time to do a good alignment with the worn parts in front. So, I had the front suspension all replaced around 209-210K mi, and re-aligned, but dealer said the rear suspension still looks good enough/okay as far as suspension parts are concerned. All tires have worn pretty evenly, but the rears have just worn faster. Now on Sep 2012, at 219K mi - diff of just 15K.
I just noticed this earlier this week. The rear's have worn down to almost nothing. I've kept the pressures at the recommended values in the manual/gas cap, like 28F/32R...I've checked them each month. I should have been looking at the tread more often, but wasn't expecting them to wear down so quickly.
Using the US Lincoln penny test:
-- right rear is the worst - next to the rim of the penny is the "In God..." motto, and most of the letters' height is visible.
-- left rear - about half the motto is visible.
-- both fronts - tread is even with where the hair meets the forehead...can't really see the hair much.
So, I can see getting another 10-15K on the fronts, but why would the rears wear so quickly ?
Also, any other Michelin recommendations? I've read around here, but not a lot of "Michelin" hits.
The only Michelins the tire place has are : PRIMACY MXV4 RRBL 98H and 98V (Both Touring-type), and PILOT SPT AS+ 98W (Ultra-Hi Perf Sport).
The Symmetry's are Pax Type.
Which type should be used with the 140's? Of course, mine is "lighter" than the 420/500/600 models.
Thx - Dave H.
(ps: bomb10177 had already made some good comments, even suggesting I've been spinning the tires too much...with my 6-cyl...I had to tell him those are just the standard rumors about the 6's)