Black Series software upgrade will take the de-tuned state away.
I'd disagree with that statement.the "engine" itself is certainly capable of producing 507HP. i think de-tuned is the wrong term. manufacturers typically don't reduce HP on purpose.
I'd agree with you, Merc uses the "63" in most of their AMG cars...while intake/catalytic converters/exhaust may play a part in the reduced output....I also think they "de-tune" on purpose to segregate the model lines.I'd disagree with that statement.
Any manufactured high performance engine that has a warranty is going to be "detuned" or is probably not putting out what it is capable of.
Well, and also it's just a matter of not pushing the motor to it's limits so that they are not replacing them under warranty. It's common practice with turbo'd or supercharged motors to reduce the potential power output (de-tune) with the use of waste gates or pulleys. That's what is so fun about buying cars with forced induction, it is usually very easy to modify them to produce more hp then the factory set up, with ECU retunning and fuel delivery also, and, and, and Oh god here I go again:crybaby2:I'd agree with you, Merc uses the "63" in most of their AMG cars...while intake/catalytic converters/exhaust may play a part in the reduced output....I also think they "de-tune" on purpose to segregate the model lines.
Think about it, if I could get a 507-518hp C63 for only 70K, then why get a 507hp E63 for 20 grand more, or a 518hp S63 for almost double the price???? lol
I would agree the tune and exhaust are probably the reason for the lower hp but not because there wasn't room. If that were the case than the CLK "Black version" would have the same HP and it has 50+ more. It also has a different exhaust than a standard CLK AMG and would guess the tune is a bit different. I think it was a choice MB made and not because of size constraints.The tune and the exhaust routing are both factors.
"The core of C63 is the 6208 cc DOHC 32-valve V8. It is not derived from any production engines of Mercedes-Benz, but designed and developed entirely by the AMG division. This engine has been used in various AMG models, namely E63, CLS63, CLK63, S63, ML63 and CL63. The baby C63 is the last one to call its service. Naturally, installed in the tighter engine compartment resulted in somewhat compromised exhaust routing. This mean some 57 horsepower has been lost compare with the larger E63 AMG. Still, the C63 cranks out 457 horsepower at 6800 rpm, some 37 horses more than the new M3. Moreover, its maximum torque of 443 lb-ft is a massive 148 lb-ft more than the BMW !"
Click the link:
Mercedes-Benz C-class W204
I also agree with tresean1. And, 2tonOfun, :thumbsup:. I miss some my forced induction cars.
Yea, that sort of what I was saying originally, I think it was a decision to psychologically segregate the models lines to keep buyers in their prospective classes. If all the engines across the model line produced the same exact hp/torque (a la BMW), then there would be no need for huge AMG S-/CL-classes if one can get the same perfomance from a smaller, less-expensive E, CLK, SLK or CI would agree the tune and exhaust are probably the reason for the lower hp but not because there wasn't room. If that were the case than the CLK "Black version" would have the same HP and it has 50+ more. It also has a different exhaust than a standard CLK AMG and would guess the tune is a bit different. I think it was a choice MB made and not because of size constraints.
Just my 2 cents.