Mercedes-Benz Forum banner

1 - 18 of 18 Posts

·
Registered
1984 300dt 1985 300 dt 1992 300e just added another 92 300e 1994 e420 1993 300te 4matic
Joined
·
2,506 Posts
Discussion Starter #1
...along the way while being bitten by the benz bug for the second time i have heard people say that in 1986 the cars took a turn for the worst because of corporate changes with an eye on bigger profits. i have heard this, im not implying anything or trying to make the happy owners of cars i could never afford angry with me, but is there anything to this? i dont want to turn away from a later model diesel because im putting faith in a rumour because a company maybe having 1 or 2 off years.

are some years better than others when looking at 300 turbo's?
 

·
Registered
'07 GL320CDI
Joined
·
5,092 Posts
1986 was the changeover year from the W123 to the W124, the latter a fabulously more modern car than it's predecessor.

However, the question is pretty much moot, as the MAJORITY of these vehicles are now simply worn out clunkers, gross polluters, and fuel hogs.
 

·
Registered
1984 300dt 1985 300 dt 1992 300e just added another 92 300e 1994 e420 1993 300te 4matic
Joined
·
2,506 Posts
Discussion Starter #3
...i wasnt trying to compare the technology with the superior cars of today. i have a little space thats all my own and im trying to find a nice 300sd which "i" can afford and be happy averaging 25ish mpg.

if i bought an 07 or '10 model version i would be expecting it to certainly be 'moot' when it came to quality.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
5,344 Posts
The great thing about being a Mercedes enthusiast is that you get the pick the specific year that you think they went to hell in a handbasket. I say 1996 was the major turning point for the worse but it took a few years to really hit bottom. 1986? That was the entry into the age of enlightenment.
 

·
Banned
a device that is designed or used to transport people or cargo.
Joined
·
14,116 Posts
Model lines and/or classes might also be held as better or worse than others, say W126 v W140. W126 itself had Gen I and Gen II split at 1986 with slight and not so slight changes (body moldings, engine selections). I do not have all the details being a MB noob myself, but some proffer that the W126's were the last of the best build quality (forget age issues). I would like to see opinions about GenI v GenII
 

·
Registered
E320/E250 Bluetec Ford F350 6.7l
Joined
·
36,038 Posts
In 1986 MB engineers had a hick-up and redesigned bulletproof 3 liter turbo-diesel with aluminum head, that had tendency to crack.
I don't think MB had ever a really bad model. The ML was called lemon for some time, yet our 99 model ML320 is the most perfect car ever.
W210 had years of bashing as well -being first fully computerized model with lot of plastic parts and lifetime transmission fluid, yet we do have nice group of members devoted to this model.
My theory is that lot of issues with Mercedes cars are mechanic-inflicted. Not only they will do unnecessary repairs for uneducated owners, but quite often they mess up something under the hood, while doing the repair.
 

·
Registered
'04 G500, '00 E55 AMG, '90 300TE 4Matic, '82 240D
Joined
·
1,951 Posts
I would say from what I've heard and from experience that the "turn for the worse" as far as overall build quality occurred somewhere in the mid to late 90's.

The reason to simplify and in this case reduce quality wasn't to increase profits (the w124's sold for close to $75k in today's dollars) but to lower prices to compete with the other imports that were selling for almost half...think Lexus/Infinity/Acura...

The W124 and sometimes W140 are considered the last of the over-engineered Mercedes, not to say they don't have issues (W140 especially), but they were built to last. The cars that came after are 'better' as far as performance and comfort are concerned but many notice the materials and build quality are disappointing in comparison to W123/124. The 98-02 ML being the definite low point.

BUT that's not the end of the story. :D Rumor is that in the last couple years Mercedes has heard the complaints (and seen their market share slide over to BMW) and that build and material quality are back on track, the W212 is supposedly a return to the ideals of the better years for Benz but only time will tell ;)
 

·
Registered
E320/E250 Bluetec Ford F350 6.7l
Joined
·
36,038 Posts
Than you need to realize what you are asking for. I still keep a souvenir I removed from 1970's Mercedes. It is gear shifter with cast aluminum cover/guide. You know -the part with P-R-N-D indicators that is made with plastic for last 30 years? So the cast aluminum today would cost high 3, if not 4 digits figure. That design also added to the car weigh. Sure it will be still here in 100 years, but the 1970's car was never design to make 40-50 mpg.
 

·
Registered
W124
Joined
·
4,764 Posts
Yes indeed.

It also created near revolt among German taxi drivers.
I'm with deanyel, the cars were never better than what they built between '86 and '95. As for German taxi drivers? Now THERE is a demographic with credibility. They sit on their asses all day and drive the same car until they retire. I love the 123 as much as most people here but I also know what its like to have a heavy car with loose suspension and no power at your disposal. Leave a 123 and a 124 in the rain for a couple of days and I will guarantee which one has water in it... And water inside a car is the kiss of death so how could quality of gone downhill AFTER 1986?
 

·
Registered
Several MB's
Joined
·
352 Posts
Quality Change

I have owned a MB continuously since 1968 and feel that I can offer a few comments on this subject. The 60's, 70's and 80's were built like tanks and their reliability was damn near unparalleled. I also owned a 1991 560SEL and feel that is the last model of the tank like MB,s. The latter 1990's and earlier to mid year 2000's is where the quality went to hell in a hand basket; more specifically in the electronics. In my 560 you had a lever to adjust the driver's side mirror not a switch with an electric motor. It worked but it was not glamorus or high tech.
In the new age MB,s you have instrument clusters that die, sensors that go bad, brake systems that brake for you (they are also known to break) and a miriad of other electronic stuff. These are the systems that pulled MB quality into the toilet. After living through many of the gremlins, a light bulb went off and raised a question. That question was how many computer manufacturers and designers are German? None to my knowldge. Bosch with many of their parts today are matching the old Prince of Darkness ,Lucas, in reliability. Fortunately the post 2006 cars have improved significantly. My wife has an S550 and the car has been bullet proof; much like my old faithful 560SEL.
 

·
Registered
90 300 SE ,85 300 GD
Joined
·
1,574 Posts
When we sold our 1999 E 300 Turbo, we actually made money, great diesel. We now own a 2008 E350 Bluetech. You have to roll down the window to be sure the engine is running!
First DIESEL, 1961 190Db
Next 1983 240D, 1984 300 DT, 1985 300GD 5-speed Gelandewagen, 1985 300TD Wagon, 1986 300SD, 1995 E300 Diesel.
 

·
Registered
E320/E250 Bluetec Ford F350 6.7l
Joined
·
36,038 Posts
I have owned a MB continuously since 1968 and feel that I can offer a few comments on this subject. The 60's, 70's and 80's were built like tanks and their reliability was damn near unparalleled. I also owned a 1991 560SEL and feel that is the last model of the tank like MB,s. The latter 1990's and earlier to mid year 2000's is where the quality went to hell in a hand basket; more specifically in the electronics. In my 560 you had a lever to adjust the driver's side mirror not a switch with an electric motor. It worked but it was not glamorus or high tech.
In the new age MB,s you have instrument clusters that die, sensors that go bad, brake systems that brake for you (they are also known to break) and a miriad of other electronic stuff. These are the systems that pulled MB quality into the toilet. After living through many of the gremlins, a light bulb went off and raised a question. That question was how many computer manufacturers and designers are German? None to my knowldge. Bosch with many of their parts today are matching the old Prince of Darkness ,Lucas, in reliability. Fortunately the post 2006 cars have improved significantly. My wife has an S550 and the car has been bullet proof; much like my old faithful 560SEL.
You forgot that pre 1990 cars constantly leaked, CC would work intermittently, the automatic transmissions would make your dentures loosen and the couple of electronic circuits were famous for not working.
So from leaking oil we moved the failing electronic sensors. Sign of the time.
 

·
Registered
W124
Joined
·
4,764 Posts
After living through many of the gremlins, a light bulb went off and raised a question. That question was how many computer manufacturers and designers are German? None to my knowldge. Bosch with many of their parts today are matching the old Prince of Darkness ,Lucas, in reliability.
Agree with you on Bosch being equivalent to "junk" these days. They have "whored" out their name and will sell it to anyone. It ain't what it used to be. On the otherhand, if you have a component made by Seimens, now THERE is a mil-spec electronic piece if ever there was one. I figure there will be enough nice 124s left on the planet for me to drive one until I die. Maybe I'll try a W140 to spice things up :)
 
1 - 18 of 18 Posts
Top