Mercedes-Benz Forum banner
1 - 16 of 16 Posts

· Registered
1984 300CD, 2015 Sprinter 3500, Coach House Platinum II
Joined
·
2,722 Posts
Discussion Starter · #1 ·
I will be needing to purchase new tires soon and I've been toying with the idea of going with a different size tire (and wheel of course). My question, what are the advantages of going with a 15" or 16" tire? Or should I just stick with 14" tires. I do drive a lot of miles and have been happy with the 14" as well. I know about the Gen II W126 brake up grade and larger wheels. Are there other reasons?

Thanks!
 

· Registered
EURO 280CE
Joined
·
1,689 Posts
there are advantages and disadvantages, there might not be as many disadvantages with 15's than there were with my 17's but mine were heavy which caused slower acceleration by a small amount. i also felt pot holes more, but at the same time the car rode much straighter and tighter, i actually felt confidence in almost any turn. at the time they were the only wheels i could find. i want 16x7's now.
 

· Registered
1978 280ce euro found dead on Ebay
Joined
·
1,805 Posts
I have just put some 16X7 off a C240. It sure makes the car nicer to drive IMO but I was running undersize tires before and these are the correct diameter for car just 1 inch wider tread. I got them cheap on ebay and there were two sets up on auction last time I looked. I got no spacers in rear an 5.0 mm hubcentric spacers in front. Car seems to hold on turns much better and my RPMs are alot lower. I would recommed 16 by 7 in tires. they even look O.K. IMO I got mine for $55 with like new tires local pickup to boot. This set ends in 5 minutes and it's at $362 plus shipping sure makes me happy.

eBay Motors: 16 MERCEDES CLK320 WHEELS C CLK SLK C240 C320 C220 190E (item 400036763988 end time Mar-22-09 19:00:00 PDT)

more time on this one set.

eBay Motors: 16 MERCEDES C Class WHEELS C CLK SLK C240 C320 C220 (item 170311981113 end time Mar-26-09 08:25:26 PDT)

hers a pic on car


 

· Registered
1984 300CD, 2015 Sprinter 3500, Coach House Platinum II
Joined
·
2,722 Posts
Discussion Starter · #4 ·
I have a set of these 7J 15 ET37;

I'm not planning on using them.
It's the advantages the larger tire size may or may not have that I'm wondering about.
 

· Registered
1983 300D
Joined
·
1,250 Posts
On the short of using a bigger tire,

the disadvantages are usually higher replacement cost and lower fuel economy (especially if your wheels are heavier then the current setup). And when you get into the 17s you get lower wet and snow traction, along with shorter tread life of the tire.

The advantages are usually improved dry handling and looks.
 

· Registered
1984 MB 190e, 1978 MB 300CD, 1985 MB 300TD, 1976 MB 240D, 1979 Chevy Truck
Joined
·
175 Posts
Install some stock 17's off a W210 5 spoke or stock 17's off a W203 5 spoke.
 

· Registered
81' 300SD, 82' 300D
Joined
·
3,954 Posts
Car seems to hold on turns much better and my RPMs are alot lower.
I don't think wheels alone cause your RPMs to get lower. The bigger wheels may just have your speedometer reading too high, making you think that you've lowered your RPMs.
 

· Registered
1978 280ce euro found dead on Ebay
Joined
·
1,805 Posts
I don't think wheels alone cause your RPMs to get lower. The bigger wheels may just have your speedometer reading too high, making you think that you've lowered your RPMs.
I was running 195/60 14s and went to 205/55 16s which are the same as stock 195/70 14 diameter but are larger than my previous 195/60 14s undersize tires. Speedometer is off as I had modified it to work with the smaller tires. BTW I have a tach
 

· Registered
1977 230, 1990 300E 2.6
Joined
·
243 Posts
There is no doubt that lower profile, wider tires will handle better on dry road conditions but you will sacrifice some fuel mileage caused by increased drag of the wider tires. That is why you see skinny tires on cars designed to give high fuel mileage. Also, in bad weather conditions, wider tires may not give as good traction because they have fewer pounds/sq. inch pressing down on the road surface. I.E., the friction coefficient is lower on wider tires. Another factor to consider when replacing tires is how many plies are in the sidewall. Many replacement tires have but one ply sidewalls and this will allow for more sidewall "set" when entering a turn, thus slightly sloppier handling. Tires with two ply sidewalls give more positive response in turns because they have less "set" or give in the sidewall. The ride is also usually slightly more firm. It all depends on what you are looking for. On the 123 cars you can get satisfactory ride, handling and fuel mileage with the correct 14" tires. If all you are really interested in is the look of low profile and big wheels with a little improvement in dry road handling, go with bigger wheels.
 

· Registered
1984 300CD, 2015 Sprinter 3500, Coach House Platinum II
Joined
·
2,722 Posts
Discussion Starter · #13 ·
There is no doubt that lower profile, wider tires will handle better on dry road conditions but you will sacrifice some fuel mileage caused by increased drag of the wider tires. That is why you see skinny tires on cars designed to give high fuel mileage. Also, in bad weather conditions, wider tires may not give as good traction because they have fewer pounds/sq. inch pressing down on the road surface. I.E., the friction coefficient is lower on wider tires. Another factor to consider when replacing tires is how many plies are in the sidewall. Many replacement tires have but one ply sidewalls and this will allow for more sidewall "set" when entering a turn, thus slightly sloppier handling. Tires with two ply sidewalls give more positive response in turns because they have less "set" or give in the sidewall. The ride is also usually slightly more firm. It all depends on what you are looking for. On the 123 cars you can get satisfactory ride, handling and fuel mileage with the correct 14" tires. If all you are really interested in is the look of low profile and big wheels with a little improvement in dry road handling, go with bigger wheels.
I'm happy with the look of my car



and I've been happy with the handling, ride and fuel mileage I have on the Michelin tires (and service) I got from Costco. Over 100,000 miles so far with no issues.
Other than the W126 bigger brake upgrade, there's no reason to change.
Thank you all for your input.
 

· Registered
1984 300CD, 2015 Sprinter 3500, Coach House Platinum II
Joined
·
2,722 Posts
Discussion Starter · #15 · (Edited)

· Registered
money pits of various forms
Joined
·
5,920 Posts
Costco is def the place to go for tires, the $50 I paid for the membership still kept me well under everyone elses prices and came with road hazard, install, liftetime rotate and balance and hassle free service while I shop with the family.

I am partial to my 15", the 14" are just to squish for me.

 
1 - 16 of 16 Posts
This is an older thread, you may not receive a response, and could be reviving an old thread. Please consider creating a new thread.
Top