Yeah, now that I don't need third row anymore (kids are older!!) I'm beginning to make that scratchy decision between a E63 and a ML63. The Optional AMG Performance Package for the E states this:
The AMG track-calibrated AIRMATIC suspension system is exclusively calibrated for use in high-speed driving conditions, while the limited-slip differential improves traction by preventing wheel slip under lower traction conditions.
I thought they all have electronically controlled traction control system! Isn't the LSD a step down in tech and efficiency in controlling traction? Or, is this designed primarily for track use?
__________________
1989 300ZXT - mine
A pair of running shoes
A 18Hp lawn mower
2 Mountain Bikes
350Z - will be mine when @ 300+HP and 3-Car Garage
The LSD in the 030 package is a huge step UP. The stock ESP system controls wheel spin by applying the brakes, cutting engine power, or both. Not what you want if you're in a hurry or racing. IMHO, LSD's should have been standard on all AMG's, not just a part of the 030 package. Many have added either the factory AMG limited slip, or aftermarket units like the Quaiffe. I don't recall anyone being unhappy with the results.
Traction control = Electronic Stability Program. It's in every Benz, and it maintains traction by applying the brakes to the spinning side and/or cuts engine power. Just watch for the flashing triangle. It does prevent massive burnouts, but at the expense of acceleration. Adding a LSD either from the 030 package or aftermarket gets the power transfered to the tire with traction before the electronic nannies slow you down. The calibration of the ESP system in an AMG is a little more aggressive than in an E350, but that's how it works. The LSD will help in putting the power down and reduce the amount time the ESP system is braking or killing power. It's something the 55's especially could use due to the massive torque in the SC cars, although the 63's have plenty of grunt as well. The benefit of the 030 package is the stiffer airmatic settings and (if you care) the speed limiter has been raised from 155 mph to 186 mph as well as the LSD.
Yeah, now that I don't need third row anymore (kids are older!!) I'm beginning to make that scratchy decision between a E63 and a ML63. The Optional AMG Performance Package for the E states this:
The AMG track-calibrated AIRMATIC suspension system is exclusively calibrated for use in high-speed driving conditions, while the limited-slip differential improves traction by preventing wheel slip under lower traction conditions.
I thought they all have electronically controlled traction control system! Isn't the LSD a step down in tech and efficiency in controlling traction? Or, is this designed primarily for track use?
The benefit of LSD is probably most apparent when coming hard (relative to available traction) out of a corner, and is an option that is highly desirable for high performance cars, on top of the now commonly available electronic traction control. I would agree that an LSD is a valueable asset for some drivers, especially for those on a track.
The full function set of an electronic traction control system does not include some of the critically useful (for high performance drivers?) functions offer by a limited-slip differential unit.
Having said that, not everyone would necessarily find the LSD feature useful enough to fork out the extra dollars. Probably a good idea is to drive the cars with and without and see if you can justified the difference in cost.
For myself, I think it would be a lot of fun to have. But I can't say I would want it until I see the price tag. :-)
Linear Mode
