» Search Used Cars
Search for used vehicles by ZIP, please enter Zipcode below:
Google Links

» Log in
User Name:

Password:

Not a member yet?
Register Now!
» Wheel & Tire Center

Sponsors


Go Back   Benzworld.org - Mercedes Benz Discussion Forum > Mercedes-Benz Coupe/Convertible Forums > W209 New CLK Class
More leg room(length) but less width than old CLK? More leg room(length) but less width than old CLK?
Register Home Forum Photo Gallery Active Topics Blogs Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read


       
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 01-05-2003, 04:15 PM   #1 (permalink)
BenzWorld Newbie
 
Date registered: Jan 2003
Vehicle: 2002 ML500
Posts: 2
More leg room(length) but less width than old CLK?
I just drove a new CLK320. I know there is more leg room for longer legs, but it seems like there is less room side to side. Is it just me or has anyone else noticed this?
dtpowell is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Reply

  Benzworld.org - Mercedes Benz Discussion Forum > Mercedes-Benz Coupe/Convertible Forums > W209 New CLK Class

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes
Linear Mode Linear Mode

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Forum Jump

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0 RC2

All times are GMT -7. The time now is 12:03 PM.

Contact Us - Mercedes-Benz Forum - Archive - Top


Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0