2006 C230 vs. 2005 C230; aka 2.5L vs. 1.8L ??? - Mercedes-Benz Forum
View Poll Results:
0 0%
Voters: 0. You may not vote on this poll

 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
#1 (permalink) Old 10-05-2005, 10:34 PM
BenzWorld Newbie
 
Date registered: Oct 2005
Vehicle: 03 C230 Sport Sedan
Location: Seattle, WA, USA
Posts: 4
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
(Thread Starter)
2006 C230 vs. 2005 C230; aka 2.5L vs. 1.8L ???

After looking at the specs of the new 2006 C230 Sedan it seems like the new 2.5L Kompresor is actually slower than the old 1.8L motor. I think that the 1.8L motor reported 7.5 sec 0-60 and the new motor is 8.0 sec 0-60 (as manuals). I think that HP is up from 189hp to 201hp and that Torque is down from 192ft/lb to 181ft/lb.

With the increase in HP I would have thought that it would have made up for the loss in torque, but apparently not even close to enough. Are there any other reasons for why the 2006 is slower than the 2005? Is it possible that the numbers are just a mistake on MB's website?

Thanks for curing the curious mind.

aaronmarks is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
#2 (permalink) Old 10-06-2005, 01:43 AM
BenzWorld Senior Member
 
DACHIGGA's Avatar
 
Date registered: Jun 2004
Posts: 464
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
RE: 2006 C230 vs. 2005 C230; aka 2.5L vs. 1.8L ???

Heavier.

Plus you need that torque to pull the car.


SUZYzDION
DACHIGGA is offline  
#3 (permalink) Old 10-06-2005, 07:52 AM
BenzWorld Elite
 
MHPHOCKEY's Avatar
 
Date registered: Oct 2002
Vehicle: 2014 Audi S5 Cabriolet 3.0T
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 1,383
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
RE: 2006 C230 vs. 2005 C230; aka 2.5L vs. 1.8L ???

it doesnt feel slower. i had a c230 komp. 2005 for 2 weeks before i got my 2006 and the 06 is much faster and feels more solid.

mike

2014 Audi S5 3.0T Cabriolet | Phantom Black Metallic/Black Nappa Leather | Premium Plus | MMI Nav Plus | Sport Diff. | Adaptive Dampening Suspension | B&O Sound | 19" 5-Spoke S Wheels | Carbon Atlas | Supercharged Badges | 35% Tint
MHPHOCKEY is offline  
#4 (permalink) Old 10-06-2005, 08:18 AM
BenzWorld Elite
 
Buellwinkle's Avatar
 
Date registered: Aug 2002
Vehicle: C230K Sport Sedan
Location: The O.C.
Posts: 5,368
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
RE: 2006 C230 vs. 2005 C230; aka 2.5L vs. 1.8L ???

The v6 has some advantages, performance isn't one of them. The s/c has a life of about 100k miles and it's expensive to replace, also when it's hot outside and the intercooler is not as effective at cooling its performance can be reduced. Not having driven the v6, I would assume it's smoother/quieter, the s/c motor can be noisy although little comes into the cabin. The upside of the s/c is better fuel mileage, the covetted Kompressor badge and better high altitude performance.

2004.5 C230K - Pewter/Charcoal - www.Buellwinkle.com



http://www.mylavista.com
Buellwinkle is offline  
#5 (permalink) Old 10-06-2005, 09:31 AM
BenzWorld Junior Member
 
Date registered: Aug 2005
Posts: 23
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
RE: 2006 C230 vs. 2005 C230; aka 2.5L vs. 1.8L ???

Quote:
aaronmarks - 10/5/2005 10:34 PM

After looking at the specs of the new 2006 C230 Sedan it seems like the new 2.5L Kompresor
The new 2.5L V6 does NOT have "Kompressor" ,NO more supercharger for C230 like before. The new 2.5L V6 has 24 valve now !! But you can get the kleemann Kompressor kit on 2006 spring !! Can't wait !!
trust203 is offline  
#6 (permalink) Old 10-06-2005, 05:45 PM
BenzWorld Junior Member
 
dieselwally's Avatar
 
Date registered: Sep 2005
Vehicle: 2005 C230 Kompressor, 2010 GLK350
Location: Tyler, Texas
Posts: 33
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
RE: 2006 C230 vs. 2005 C230; aka 2.5L vs. 1.8L ???

Hope to prove you wrong on that 100K life expectancy on the s/c. Come on if a GM 3.8 S/C can go for 250K easy. I had the original turbo on my TDI with 150K when I sold it, and most people were replacing after about 60.[:D]

To the original poster more torque and less weight.[:p]

2005 Black Opal C230K
2010 Black GLK350
dieselwally is offline  
#7 (permalink) Old 10-07-2005, 08:36 AM
BenzWorld Elite
 
Buellwinkle's Avatar
 
Date registered: Aug 2002
Vehicle: C230K Sport Sedan
Location: The O.C.
Posts: 5,368
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
RE: 2006 C230 vs. 2005 C230; aka 2.5L vs. 1.8L ???

Since boost is bypassed most of the time, the life of the s/c is likely porportional to the amount of time it's actually used. So someone with a lead foot, revs it to redline all the time will certainly have a shorter life than someone that doesn't. So while it's possible for it to last forever, Eaton rates it at 100k miles.

2004.5 C230K - Pewter/Charcoal - www.Buellwinkle.com



http://www.mylavista.com
Buellwinkle is offline  
Reply

  Mercedes-Benz Forum > Mercedes-Benz Sedan Forums > W203 C-Class


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
User Tag List

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Linear Mode



Posting Rules  
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

 
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome