» Search Used Cars
Search for used vehicles by ZIP, please enter Zipcode below:
Google Links

» Log in
User Name:

Password:

Not a member yet?
Register Now!
» Wheel & Tire Center

Sponsors


Go Back   Benzworld.org - Mercedes Benz Discussion Forum > Mercedes-Benz Vans/Trucks/SUV/Others > W164 M-Class
Register Home Forum Photo Gallery Active Topics Blogs Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read


       
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 03-03-2008, 02:28 PM   #1 (permalink)
zak
BenzWorld Member
 
Date registered: Jun 2004
Vehicle: 2007 ML CDI, 1996 E300D, 1987 300TD, 1984 300D euro, 1967 250SL
Location: Bernardsville NJ
Posts: 225
ML CDI fuel consumption

My ML CDI is approaching 30K miles and keeps getting better.
The 7 spd trans has turned out great and is always in correct gear.
But even better is the improving fuel consumption, on my usual 50 mile commute, with 40 miles hiway, I am averaging 27.9- 28.4 MPG. That is significantly higher then the 24's I was getting in the beginning.
I guess it's just breaking in !
zak is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Old 03-04-2008, 01:56 PM   #2 (permalink)
BenzWorld Junior Member
 
Date registered: Jan 2008
Vehicle: '07 ML280CDI
Location: Canberra, Australia
Posts: 30
The economy is superb isn't it.

I have a ML280CDI (with only 4,000km on it so far) and am getting 10.4 l/100km for my commute. That translates to roughly 27.4mpg.

On the highway I have been getting high 8's (l/100km) - roughly 32.5mpg.

The thing that really surprises me is the midrange urge on offer - effortless overtaking ability on two-lane highways.
ants_oz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-04-2008, 03:31 PM   #3 (permalink)
zak
BenzWorld Member
 
Date registered: Jun 2004
Vehicle: 2007 ML CDI, 1996 E300D, 1987 300TD, 1984 300D euro, 1967 250SL
Location: Bernardsville NJ
Posts: 225
Yes, the mid range power is turbine-like.
But I also find myself hitting the redline on some flat out hiway accelerations.
I can't help it.
zak is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-20-2008, 06:49 PM   #4 (permalink)
BenzWorld Junior Member
 
Date registered: Dec 2007
Posts: 5
Quote:
Originally Posted by ants_oz View Post
The economy is superb isn't it.

I have a ML280CDI (with only 4,000km on it so far) and am getting 10.4 l/100km for my commute. That translates to roughly 27.4mpg.

On the highway I have been getting high 8's (l/100km) - roughly 32.5mpg.

The thing that really surprises me is the midrange urge on offer - effortless overtaking ability on two-lane highways.

Just made a app. 650 miles (=one tank) trip with '08 ML with less than 3000 miles in the odo. I got 28,5 mpg. Previously within a 400 miles trip I got almost 31 mpg, but I drove more carefully. I look forward those > 30 mpg numbers.

Yes, the engine is powerful, as are all the modern (mostly commonrail) diesel engines. I previously had in Europe a Peugeot 407 with 1.6 (!) liter engine - it wasn't a rocket at all, but with 260 Nm it however gave very good acceleration with such a big car. ANd the consumption: 5,2 l/100 km = over 45 mpg. It is really a pity diesel engines are so rare here in the US. Hopefully 2009 will show more alternatives.
yokkeri is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-20-2008, 10:50 PM   #5 (permalink)
Lifetime Premium Member
 
MB-SV's Avatar
 
Date registered: Nov 2007
Location: overlooking Silicon Valley
Posts: 4,003
Lifetime Premium Member
Quote:
Originally Posted by zak View Post
Yes, the mid range power is turbine-like.
But I also find myself hitting the redline on some flat out hiway accelerations.
I can't help it.
High end horsepower is sacrificed with the diesel, that's why the diesel is significantly slower than the 3.5L V6. But the diesel fuel mileage is great. Diesels are less popular here with prices running well over $4/gallon for diesel.
__________________
S.


2008 Mercedes C300 Sport mars red/black
2007 Lexus IS350 Sport granite metallic/gray
2004 Porsche 986S seal gray metallic/black/black
2002 Jeep KJ Sport white/gray
MB-SV is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-21-2008, 09:11 AM   #6 (permalink)
JW
BenzWorld Junior Member
 
Date registered: Sep 2002
Posts: 28
The specs I have read for the CDI vs the 3.5L in the E-Class is that the CDI is .1 seconds faster 0-60.

JW
JW is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-21-2008, 09:38 AM   #7 (permalink)
Lifetime Premium Member
 
MB-SV's Avatar
 
Date registered: Nov 2007
Location: overlooking Silicon Valley
Posts: 4,003
Lifetime Premium Member
Quote:
Originally Posted by JW View Post
The specs I have read for the CDI vs the 3.5L in the E-Class is that the CDI is .1 seconds faster 0-60.

JW
Car and Driver did an actual road test and found that it was closer to a full second slower for the E-class. They also noted that the diesel was slower than MB's published spec.
MB-SV is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Reply

  Benzworld.org - Mercedes Benz Discussion Forum > Mercedes-Benz Vans/Trucks/SUV/Others > W164 M-Class


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Topic Author Forum Replies Last Post
How is better for fuel consumption: isarescu R170 SLK Class 3 02-01-2008 02:21 AM
Smart CDI fuel consumption Paul64 smart 2 01-15-2008 04:46 PM
Vito 111 CDI Fuel consumption? Priapos V-Class 0 01-15-2008 09:09 AM
fuel pump affecting fuel consumption? rich369 W140 S-Class 0 11-22-2006 09:32 PM
fuel consumption Valentino G-Class 4 02-26-2003 03:13 AM

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0 RC2

All times are GMT -7. The time now is 05:57 AM.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0