No, the w126 280 SE/L was never imported. It is a grey market Euro spec car. Ironically, the power in this thing is almost close to a U.S. spec 560 SEL.
Actually the power is almost identical to the US 500 SEL of 1984 and 1985. All due to smog junk and cams. Mercedes did much better with the 560's which actually drive pretty well. The US 500's were dogs that barked, US 380s howled.
I'd say it's fairly close to the 500... the 500 had ~200hp, the 280 had ~185. It's not in the same league as the 560, though. The U.S. spec 560s are factory rated @ 238HP.
I'd say it's fairly close to the 500... the 500 had ~200hp, the 280 had ~185. It's not in the same league as the 560, though. The U.S. spec 560s are factory rated @ 238HP.
Horsepower means nothing without torque and in the case of a heavy car like a W126, some LOW END torque. The 2.8 liter fuel injected engine only had 177 LB-FT @ 4500 RPM versus 247 LB-FT @ 2000 RPM for a U.S. specification 500. The U.S. specification 560 had 307 LB-FT @ 3750 RPM. Quite a bit of difference. The 280 might be a great highway car, but the8-cylinder models have it beat stoplight to stoplight.
Jim, you're absolutely correct. In fact, I was thinking about it as I walked out to the 560 to come home a few minutes ago, and I think the 6 cylinders are just very ill-suited to the W126.
I had a 1967 250SE that I was going to restore before I had the 560, and my grandfather drove the 250 for years, so I know what it's like.
The inline 6 loves being revved. Its totally out of it's element below 3000rpms or so. The larger displacement of the 280 and 300s would have counteracted that somewhat, but the bottom line is still the same:
The I-6 is a sports car engine, not a luxury car engine. To get the most out of it, you really have to have a manual transmission. It's a great engine, but it doesn't fit the "personality" of the W126 very well at all.
Yes, but keep in mind that a Euro-spec 280SE weighs substantially LESS than a American-spec 500SEL, so much so that in a race i wouldnt bet on the 500. Especially if that 280SE was a 5-speed model (although Benz 5-speeds are known to be a bit clunky)
Also keep in mind the 250 engine and the 280 engine are VERY different and nothing parts wise is shared. My dad has a 1978 250 T (W123). The 280 TE for example, simply blows it away.
Yes, but keep in mind that a Euro-spec 280SE weighs substantially LESS than a American-spec 500SEL, so much so that in a race i wouldnt bet on the 500.
* lack of US bumper & beam supports (Euro-spec)
* being a shorter wheelbase (longer SELs weigh more than their SE counterparts)
* the engine is substantially less weight
* lack of US bumper & beam supports (Euro-spec)
* being a shorter wheelbase (longer SELs weigh more than their SE counterparts)
* the engine is substantially less weight
First off, compare the 2.8L properly. Compare the 280 SE to the 500 SE and the 500 SEL to the 280 SEL.[/*]
The difference in bumper weights is what, less than 200 pounds? In fact, it's probably less than 100 pounds. Not enough of a difference there to even mention.[/*]
Same goes for the engine weight. An aluminum block and heads makes for a small difference in weight between the two.[/*]
If we didn't have the silly Federally-mandated 55 MPH speed limit here in the U.S. during most of the eighties, Mercedes just might've actively marketed the 2.8L in the W126 over here.
This is an older thread, you may not receive a response, and could be reviving an old thread. Please consider creating a new thread.
Related Threads
?
?
?
?
?
Mercedes-Benz Forum
7.6M posts
693.6K members
Since 1999
BenzWorld.org forum is one of the largest Mercedes-Benz owner websites offering the most comprehensive collection of Mercedes-Benz information anywhere in the world. The site includes MB Forums, News, Galleries, Publications, Classifieds, Events and much more!