the seat back locks on to the striker in the upright position/ on the striker there should be a plastic bushing around it , generally these are either worn out or missing after years of service.
the armrest also has a bushing , this can be accessed by removing the cap on the armrest, sliding off the armrest and replacing bushing/ both of these parts are the same as on american version SL's and are available from your dealer/ (rather cheap too)
I know this thread is pretty stale, but thought I'd exhume it instead of starting anew.
Does anyone kow if the armrest is supposed to be linked to the seat back such that reclining the seat means having the armrest shift up into a non-horizontal state? It's rather annoying. It would be great if it would remain horizontal regardless of seat back position. Are they all like this?
Does anyone kow if the armrest is supposed to be linked to the seat back such that reclining the seat means having the armrest shift up into a non-horizontal state? It's rather annoying. It would be great if it would remain horizontal regardless of seat back position.
Mine is just like that. If I lean the seat forward, the armrest goes down. If I recline the seat back, it goes up. The mechanism required to do anything else would be very complicated.
__________________ When I die, I want to go quietly in my sleep, like Grandpa.
Not screaming, like the people in his car.
Juvenis quod fanaticus nunquam concilio usus quod proditus
Good point. Don't know why I didn't see that. As long as it's attached to the seat, it has no way of knowing what's horizontal. Oh well. I suppose one design flaw is not bad. Nothing's perfect.
The AutoGuide.com network consists of the largest network of enthusiast-owned enthusiast-operated automotive communities.
AutoGuide.com provides the latest car reviews, auto show coverage, new car prices, and automotive news. The AutoGuide network operates more than 100 automotive forums where our users consult peers for shopping information and advice, and share opinions as a community.