Prop 8 upheld by CA Supreme Court 6-1 - Page 25 - Mercedes-Benz Forum

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
post #241 of 267 (permalink) Old 05-30-2009, 12:10 PM
BenzWorld Elite
 
Date registered: Sep 2004
Vehicle: 95 E300
Location: Inside my head
Posts: 36,850
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Quoted: 392 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by mcbear View Post
Actually, I think that the library is mine, not Qs.

The Franklin speech has been contentious for over 200 years. What he said, why he said it, even IF he said parts of it.

What is know for sure is that he stepped up at a moment in time to refocus everyone on the true meaning of what needed addressed.

Here is one scholars view of what he calls the "controversy". It brings the meaning of WHY he said what he said to question. The source is good and well researched with solid references. It doesn't discount the merits of what he said, but it does put things in a somewhat different view.

The Franklin Prayer
Let me apologize up-front and admit I am not going to read Franklin's prayer nor commentary on his prayer, nor argument on the commentary about his prayer nor wheather he even prayed any of it or all of it or none of it.

My understanding of Franklin is that he came to different understandings of his beliefs as time passed.

So if we take any normal life as layered like an Shrek's onion, then Franklin's life would have been comparatively layered as a Tiramisu. If we inspect a single layer of this life, we will find a particular answer concerning Mr Franklin's religiosity, or lack thereof.

In his younger years he was what Christians charitably describe as "a free-thinker."

In his middle years he was a deist, sort-of. A deist of convenience, perhaps.

Toward the latter part of his middle years he became a Mason (IIRC). What is the one thing you must believe in order to become a Mason?

Toward the end of his years he (re-)joined the Quackers and with the Quakers, conducted probably the first peaceful demonstration that disrupted Congress while in session. It was to protest a coming vote allowing slavery. With his Quaker congregation, he was an ardent abolitionist and warned that failure to address the incongruity of the Declaration of Independence with the myopic practicality of the Constitution would wreck the republic. perhaps he spoke with God's prophecy. At any rate, he was right.

B

The biggest problems we are facing right now have to do with George Bush trying to bring more and more power into the executive branch and not go through Congress at all and thatís what I intend to reverse.

~ Senator Barack H. Obama
Botnst is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #242 of 267 (permalink) Old 05-30-2009, 12:20 PM
Lifetime Premium Member
 
Shane's Avatar
 
Date registered: Aug 2002
Vehicle: Taking my time on my ride
Location: north American continent
Posts: 41,768
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Quoted: 1795 Post(s)
Lifetime Premium Member
So someone fears the reaper, what else is new?
Shane is offline  
post #243 of 267 (permalink) Old 05-30-2009, 12:22 PM
BenzWorld Elite
 
Date registered: Sep 2004
Vehicle: 95 E300
Location: Inside my head
Posts: 36,850
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Quoted: 392 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shane View Post
So someone fears the reaper, what else is new?
MORE COWBELL!!!!

The biggest problems we are facing right now have to do with George Bush trying to bring more and more power into the executive branch and not go through Congress at all and thatís what I intend to reverse.

~ Senator Barack H. Obama
Botnst is offline  
post #244 of 267 (permalink) Old 05-30-2009, 12:26 PM
Lifetime Premium Member
 
Shane's Avatar
 
Date registered: Aug 2002
Vehicle: Taking my time on my ride
Location: north American continent
Posts: 41,768
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Quoted: 1795 Post(s)
Lifetime Premium Member
The unknown or nonexistent is scary as hell, I am not immune. The bell tolls for everyone, chief.
Shane is offline  
post #245 of 267 (permalink) Old 05-30-2009, 12:35 PM
BenzWorld Elite
 
mcbear's Avatar
 
Date registered: Apr 2004
Vehicle: E500Es
Location: The BlueGrass State
Posts: 29,579
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by mcbear View Post
So the question is, which group is trying to rewrite history to serve their purpose? The group that puts the Franklin Prayer speech in abstract form, void of context or the group that floods the Franklin Prayer speech with secondary and tertiary sources, all from The Records of the Federal Convention of 1787 which cast a different view as to the motives and reasoning behind the speech? Each could be considered to be presenting to the best light of their point of view and purpose.

I tend to look at the body of Franklin's words and see what is consistent throughout his life. I also find that, many times as the founders got older they changed their viewpoints on many things, the perceptions of religion among them [that is a very good trait in anyone]. So it is possible in some of these folks to pull very accurate slices of their beliefs at different times that signify different views of their philosophy.

Earlier this month I was at a roundtable with Buddhist monks, Cherokee Shamen, a Presbyterian Minister and a few other folks. My thoughts changed on some things changes a bit just within that two day period.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Botnst View Post
Let me apologize up-front and admit I am not going to read Franklin's prayer nor commentary on his prayer, nor argument on the commentary about his prayer nor wheather he even prayed any of it or all of it or none of it.

My understanding of Franklin is that he came to different understandings of his beliefs as time passed.

So if we take any normal life as layered like an Shrek's onion, then Franklin's life would have been comparatively layered as a Tiramisu. If we inspect a single layer of this life, we will find a particular answer concerning Mr Franklin's religiosity, or lack thereof.

In his younger years he was what Christians charitably describe as "a free-thinker."

In his middle years he was a deist, sort-of. A deist of convenience, perhaps.

Toward the latter part of his middle years he became a Mason (IIRC). What is the one thing you must believe in order to become a Mason?

Toward the end of his years he (re-)joined the Quackers and with the Quakers, conducted probably the first peaceful demonstration that disrupted Congress while in session. It was to protest a coming vote allowing slavery. With his Quaker congregation, he was an ardent abolitionist and warned that failure to address the incongruity of the Declaration of Independence with the myopic practicality of the Constitution would wreck the republic. perhaps he spoke with God's prophecy. At any rate, he was right.

B
When I read through the founders books and papers, it is Franklin and Jefferson that I find most appealing; mostly because they are the most textured of the group.

McBear,
Kentucky

Being smart is knowing the difference, in a sticky situation between a well delivered anecdote and a well delivered antidote - bear.
mcbear is offline  
post #246 of 267 (permalink) Old 05-30-2009, 01:07 PM
BenzWorld Elite
 
Date registered: Sep 2004
Vehicle: 95 E300
Location: Inside my head
Posts: 36,850
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Quoted: 392 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shane View Post
The unknown or nonexistent is scary as hell, I am not immune. The bell tolls for everyone, chief.
So is the known.

There is no choice: Deal with it with the tools that suit you best. For most people around the planet and through time, it's religious expression of some sort. Fine with me.


B

The biggest problems we are facing right now have to do with George Bush trying to bring more and more power into the executive branch and not go through Congress at all and thatís what I intend to reverse.

~ Senator Barack H. Obama
Botnst is offline  
post #247 of 267 (permalink) Old 05-30-2009, 01:07 PM
BenzWorld Elite
 
Date registered: Sep 2004
Vehicle: 95 E300
Location: Inside my head
Posts: 36,850
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Quoted: 392 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by mcbear View Post
When I read through the founders books and papers, it is Franklin and Jefferson that I find most appealing; mostly because they are the most textured of the group.
No question.

The biggest problems we are facing right now have to do with George Bush trying to bring more and more power into the executive branch and not go through Congress at all and thatís what I intend to reverse.

~ Senator Barack H. Obama
Botnst is offline  
post #248 of 267 (permalink) Old 05-30-2009, 02:36 PM
BenzWorld Member
 
Usual Suspect's Avatar
 
Date registered: Sep 2004
Vehicle: W126
Location: West Coast
Posts: 90
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
After the courts ram gay marriage down our throats. Can anyone give me one good legal reason why polygamists should not be allowed the same protection under the equal protection clause?
Usual Suspect is offline  
post #249 of 267 (permalink) Old 05-30-2009, 02:46 PM
Moderately subtle
 
edfreeman's Avatar
 
Date registered: Dec 2003
Vehicle: 94 E500, 97 500SL
Location: Soddy Daisy, TN
Posts: 9,618
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Quoted: 112 Post(s)
Lifetime Premium Member
Send a message via AIM to edfreeman
If the SCOTUS chooses to apply Amendment 14 and strike down the Calif proposition, it will depend on what the protections/privileges of the law with regards to marriage (or whatever you want to call it) are. I would think the benefits of dependency and survivorship are it, and I think an argument could be made that polygamists could be denied multiple marriages without losing those benefits (ie - they'd have the same right to 1 as everybody).

edfreeman is offline  
post #250 of 267 (permalink) Old 05-30-2009, 02:59 PM
BenzWorld Elite
 
jdc1244's Avatar
 
Date registered: Jun 2003
Vehicle: 1991 300 SE
Location: Lakeland, Florida
Posts: 18,534
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Quote:
After the courts ram gay marriage down our throats.
Nothing is being rammed down anyone‚Äôs throat ‚Äď due process and equal protection, per the Constitution, are being preserved.
jdc1244 is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Reply

  Mercedes-Benz Forum > General Mercedes-Benz Forums > Off-Topic

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now



In order to be able to post messages on the Mercedes-Benz Forum forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.

User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.

Password:


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Email Address:
OR

Log-in









Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.




Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Linear Mode



Similar Threads
Topic Author Forum Replies Last Post
You be the Supreme Court and decided, Yea or Nay....... Jakarta Expat Off-Topic 3 04-21-2009 08:39 AM
2nd Amendment upheld by the Supreme Court! Bruce R. Off-Topic 112 07-01-2008 05:06 AM
Proof of ID to vote upheld by Supreme Court 430 Off-Topic 20 04-28-2008 08:54 PM
Mann Coulter doesn't like new Supreme Court nominee, so he must be OK FeelTheLove Off-Topic 9 07-20-2005 06:13 PM
Very significant ruling by the Nebraska Supreme Court GeeS Off-Topic 11 02-02-2005 09:24 PM

Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

 

Title goes here

close
video goes here
description goes here. Read Full Story
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome