Yes, you did.
Revisit Post #180. Do you see the bit above mcbear's post where it says "Originally Posted by Stuantle"? That is there to clearly indicate that mcbear is addressing Stuantle. Just as I quoted part of your post to clearly indicate that I am addressing you. Get it?
Well Star maybe you are not as bright as the old guy acid tripn, it just so happens he quotes him twice sir. Pay attension. He quotes three periods and then "Really, stay out of the deep end, it was good advice". Now by him starting with really he is implying he:
1. Seconds the original speakers ststement; meaning....
2. Take the advice seriously.
3. He could of said a name, anyones could have been used.
Instead of "it was good advice", which is extra general in terms of who he is refering to, he could have simply said, "take your own advice".
Or at the least if he was in fact talking to stu he could have said, "YOU", and addressed someone clearly.
Maybe if he would have quoted something from Stu with substance I would have known he was talking about him, and not adding to the end of his remark with ummmmmm I don't know three f**king dots (usually used in America and the rest of the world, after TO BE CONTINUED... like so.
Think of it like this class the only things he added were "Really" and "it was good advice", which changes nothing from the original as to who he is aiming the comment at!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
If I were you guys my argument would not have been his quoting skills (...), it would have been, he says my name no where in that individual post.
You all are used to forum land talk sort a speak, hypothetically MCBear could have set that up to fool me into thinking he was talking bout me and then recallrd back to the specifics of the quote and have been justified by it even though it is unclear and light on just about everything that could be used to identify the target, in a plot to show the newbie the ropes. But I know he didn't and I am no averge Joe, so loss cause slave or the boss.
Have I still misunderstood?