Churchgoers more likely to back torture - Page 26 - Mercedes-Benz Forum

LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
post #251 of 279 (permalink) Old 05-05-2009, 08:50 AM
BenzWorld Elite
Stuantle's Avatar
Date registered: Jan 2008
Posts: 5,871
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
How is life as a Father? New little girl OK?
Stuantle is offline  
Sponsored Links
post #252 of 279 (permalink) Old 05-05-2009, 09:05 AM
Jakarta Expat's Avatar
Date registered: Aug 2006
Vehicle: PM me to Join the Expat Muslims for Obama Club........
Location: Jakarta, Indonesia
Posts: 17,697
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Originally Posted by Stuantle View Post
How is life as a Father? New little girl OK?

Good, she wears the wife out, I step in and pickup the slack, I really don't much believe in these cheap nannies that we can hire here to raise your kids. We both are keeping the kms off of both of our cars, we rarely go out.

The little one has a small cold and runny nose but she is fine, took her for a checkup the other day and all is Ok, her Hemoglobin was a little low but we have her on something to build that back up. She is gaining weight like a Sumo wrestler.........
Jakarta Expat is offline  
post #253 of 279 (permalink) Old 05-05-2009, 07:59 PM
BenzWorld Elite
Date registered: Feb 2007
Vehicle: 300SD
Location: Florida, USA
Posts: 11,191
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Quoted: 62 Post(s)
Here is another Church going pious hypocrite:

Raw Story Gonzales says US should be open to torturing again
p100 is offline  
post #254 of 279 (permalink) Old 05-05-2009, 08:03 PM
Surely A Large Human
Qubes's Avatar
Date registered: Jun 2006
Vehicle: '08 C219
Location: Between Earth and Mars
Posts: 34,619
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Quoted: 640 Post(s)
Lifetime Premium Member
^ Say what you want about Alberto Gonzales, that's one immigrant who knows which lawn to mow.
Qubes is offline  
post #255 of 279 (permalink) Old 05-06-2009, 04:40 AM
BenzWorld Elite
TNTRower's Avatar
Date registered: Sep 2007
Vehicle: '98 E320 Wagon (non 4matic)
Location: Atlanta, GA & Malabo, Equatorial Guinea
Posts: 6,663
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Send a message via AIM to TNTRower
Originally Posted by p100 View Post
Here is another Church going pious hypocrite:

Raw Story Gonzales says US should be open to torturing again
Wow! Where in the story does Gonzalez say that? The author says he says it but he does not actually quote Gonzalez as saying that.

Funny how you like to read stories that feed your opinion there yoo hoo.

Who's John Galt.

"Timeo Danaos et dona ferentes" - Virgil, The Aeneid, Book 2

If the Arabs put down their weapons today, there would be no more violence. If the Jews put down their weapons today, there would be no more Israel. --Benjamin Netayahu
TNTRower is offline  
post #256 of 279 (permalink) Old 05-06-2009, 06:36 AM
Surely A Large Human
Qubes's Avatar
Date registered: Jun 2006
Vehicle: '08 C219
Location: Between Earth and Mars
Posts: 34,619
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Quoted: 640 Post(s)
Lifetime Premium Member
^ Wanna show where he condemns it?
Qubes is offline  
post #257 of 279 (permalink) Old 05-06-2009, 02:16 PM
Date registered: Apr 2009
Posts: 299
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Churchgoers more likely to back torture ?

Nah...... I'm not buying it.

Since I first read this thread I've asked a total of 27 people if they would condone various forms of torture to suspected terrorists if the end result was an attempt to save American lives.

Only one said no!..... and she is a Roman Catholic.

Now! I am not attempting to be contrary to what the original poster has written. Maybe it's just that I polled a different demographic group.

The youngest was in their late 30's, with the majority in their late 50's / early 60's. Both sexes, 3 political parties and all races involved.

When I asked what they thought of "waterboarding" the most ruthless reply came from one of my fishing buddies .... 61 ... Black ... Marine .... self proclained "Godless Heathen" who offered that he would just stick an 18/0 hook through the chin of said terrorist and troll him at high speed until he spilled his guts and whistled dixie through his ass ....... then and only then would he slow down to a speed where a shark could get him.

There were a few other examples of what should be done , but not as colorful ...... ghastly yes....

Could it just be that the CNN poll was done with a demographic designed to get a specific outcome?
Big B is offline  
post #258 of 279 (permalink) Old 05-06-2009, 03:28 PM Thread Starter
BenzWorld Elite
Smackrattle's Avatar
Date registered: Nov 2005
Posts: 13,242
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Quoted: 454 Post(s)
(Thread Starter)
@ Big D

If I have three bananas and I eat two apples, how many oranges do I have left?

"Religion is regarded by the common people as true, by the wise as false, and by the rulers as useful" - Seneca
Smackrattle is offline  
post #259 of 279 (permalink) Old 05-13-2009, 10:21 AM
It Is What It Is, Dude
isthisdave's Avatar
Date registered: Mar 2006
Vehicle: 1978 107.024 RIP
Location: InTransition
Posts: 21,900
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Quoted: 95 Post(s)
Lifetime Premium Member

Torture debate prompts evangelical soul-searching

By ERIC GORSKI, AP Religion – 1 hr 15 mins ago

Among evangelical leaders, debate over the use of harsh interrogation techniques against suspected terrorists has prompted introspection about faith, ethics, the Golden Rule, just wars, Jack Bauer and Jesus.

A number of evangelical leaders have made opposition to torture without exceptions a moral cause over the past three years, part of a broadening of the movement's agenda beyond traditional culture war issues. Others in the movement, including many Christian right leaders, have largely resisted or stayed silent.

Now, President Barack Obama's release of Bush administration memos justifying harsh interrogation techniques and a new poll showing white evangelicals more sympathetic to torture have leaders taking stock of whether evangelical opinion has shifted on the topic.

"I have said before that torture is like a bone caught in our throat — we can't swallow it and we can't spit it out," said David Gushee, a professor of Christian ethics at Mercer University in Atlanta and president of Evangelicals for Human Rights. "I think we're still there."

The poll data from a survey of 742 U.S. adults released April 29 by the Pew Forum on Religion and Public Life found 62 percent of white evangelical Protestants said torture of a suspected terrorist could be often or sometimes justified to obtain important information.

By contrast, 51 percent of white non-Hispanic Catholics, 46 percent of white mainline Protestants and 40 percent of the religiously unaffiliated held that position.

Those who attend religious services at least once a week were more likely than those who rarely or never attend to say torture is sometimes or often justified in that scenario — 54 percent to 42 percent.

The findings immediately prompted questions for evangelicals: How exactly did poll participants define torture, since the survey did not? Did evangelicals reach their conclusions because of their religious beliefs, or their politics or ideological leanings? How do you untangle those factors from each other?

Pew officials later updated the analysis to emphasize that religion "is only one of many factors" — and that political party and ideology are much better predictors of opinions on torture than religion and most other demographic factors. At the same time, the report noted, religion itself can play a strong role in shaping partisanship and ideology.

"My experience is that people who are comfortable supporting torture support it because they think it's going to produce information our country needs," said the Rev. Richard Killmer, a Presbyterian Church (U.S.A.) minister and executive director of the interfaith National Religious Campaign Against Torture, which formed in 2006. "I don't think they would shy away from use of the word 'torture.'"

"During the last eight years, people have been concerned about this ticking time bomb thing and Jack Bauer and '24' and all that," said Killmer, referring to the TV drama in which the protagonist takes a by-any-means-necessary approach to extracting information from terror suspects.

Among evangelicals, Gushee has been a leading anti-torture advocate. He led the effort to draft, in 2006, "An Evangelical Declaration Against Torture: Protecting Human Rights in an Age of Terror." The document, which has 250 signatures, renounced torture and "cruel, inhuman, and degrading treatment of detainees."

Last fall, a poll commissioned by Faith in Public Life and Mercer University found that 44 percent of white Southern evangelicals rely on life experience and common sense to form opinions on torture. By contrast, 28 percent said they relied on Christian teachings or beliefs.

Even so, Gushee said he senses a "deep moral, spiritual and theological problem" in evangelical support for torture.

"There is a version of Christianity in America that I think is not adequately committed to the Bible's teachings about the sacredness of every human life, including the lives of our enemies," Gushee said. "It's also insufficiently committed to the peacemaking teachings of Jesus and the example of Jesus as one who did not resort to violence or cruelty to accomplish any of his goals and instead suffered violence instead of inflicting it."

Gary Bauer, a former Republican presidential candidate affiliated with several Christian right groups over the years, said the discussion should not come down to "Would Jesus torture?"

"There are a lot of things Jesus wouldn't do because he's the son of God," he said. "I can't imagine Jesus being a Marine or a policeman or a bank president, for that matter. The more appropriate question is, 'What is a follower of Jesus permitted to do?'"

Bauer said the answer is "it depends" — but the moral equation changes when the suspect is not a soldier captured on a battlefield but a terrorist who may have knowledge of an impending attack. He said he does not consider water-boarding — a form of interrogation that simulates drowning — to be torture.

"I think if we believe the person we have can give us information to stop thousands of Americans from being killed, it would be morally suspect to not use harsh tactics to get that information," Bauer said.

Under Christianity's just-war tradition, recognized political authorities have the responsibility to protect the innocent from grave harm, said Keith Pavlischek, a senior fellow at the Ethics and Public Policy Center, evangelical scholar and retired Marine colonel.

That means not just lives that would be lost in an attack, but the justice, order and peace of the broader international community at risk from terrorism, said Pavlischek, a member of the Presbyterian Church in America, a conservative denomination.

If authorities believe a detainee has information about an imminent attack, it's morally acceptable to use coercion, inflict pain, cause discomfort and use force in an attempt to prevent the attack, he said.

But it is not black and white in determining when interrogation tactics cross the line to unjust torture, Pavlischek said. He said while evidence exists that water-boarding might be out of line, "it's a hard call." Similarly, sleep deprivation can also be used to extremes and cross the line, but not always.

Richard Land, president of the Ethics and Religious Liberty Commission of the Southern Baptist Convention, the nation's largest evangelical church body, revealed this month that he believes water-boarding is torture and never justified. He said part of his conclusion is based on his belief that it's "very likely to cause permanent psychological damage."

"It seems to me once you accept the 'end justifies the means' argument, then you have taken a step onto a very steep and slippery slope to dark and dangerous place," Land said.

He emphasized that Christian tenets that guide the debate — including the Golden Rule, or "Do unto others as you would have them do unto you" — can be applied differently. He said that while terrorists should not be "mistreated," neither do they deserve protections afforded prisoners of war by the Geneva Convention.

Land said some harsh interrogation techniques — such as slapping with an open hand — can be morally permissible.

David Neff, editor of Christianity Today magazine and chairman of the board of the National Association of Evangelicals, which endorsed the evangelical declaration against torture, said torture is not a subject preached at most evangelical churches. So white evangelical support for torture is more likely rooted in their strong allegiance the Republican Party.

"There is a sense of, 'We trust this administration that was leading us through this difficult time post-911, and if they say we have to do this, chances are that sometimes it's necessary,'" Neff said.

He added: "It think it is extremely important for the U.S. government, for our own security, to operate as ethically as possible, because what we sow, we reap."
isthisdave is offline  
post #260 of 279 (permalink) Old 05-13-2009, 03:22 PM
BenzWorld Elite
Monstermog1964's Avatar
Date registered: Oct 2006
Location: Eastern, MT
Posts: 1,873
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Quoted: 5 Post(s)
Send a message via Yahoo to Monstermog1964
Considering your Religion vs. Religious zealots who think it's an honor to be tortured. I would say that based on being an American...Most Americans including all of the house and democrat zealots didn't have any problems approving the torture methods. Now because they have a spineless potus and a embarassing base of neckromaniacs who's sole goal is to make America like europe....equal---aploogizing for this...bullshi.!

I am one of those American's. I love my country and will do anything to protect her. Somehow I don't think any of you would have said this if it was the day of 9/11 again! It's amazing what the mind thinks of when given too much time to think in our liberal schools of thought. What about the Atom bomb being dropped!!!....Cool then we saw the horrible pictures....then we had crazy dingbats like Fara Faucet who had a big mouth and others who made us feel sorry for this action. I say we should have dropped more. It was the nuclear bomb that ended the Japaneese ridiculous thought that they were the only ones worth living on this earth!

Look at the Natzi war.....Same thoughts! America...wake up.
Monstermog1964 is offline  
Sponsored Links

  Mercedes-Benz Forum > General Mercedes-Benz Forums > Off-Topic

Quick Reply

Register Now

In order to be able to post messages on the Mercedes-Benz Forum forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.

User Name:
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Email Address:


Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Linear Mode

Similar Threads
Topic Author Forum Replies Last Post
Torture or medicine eric242340 Off-Topic 21 06-27-2008 01:24 PM
Mercedes Torture? Teutone Off-Topic 6 01-08-2008 12:06 AM
seems we torture our own too mzsmbs Off-Topic 2 07-19-2006 10:59 AM
Bush makes important speech on torture, saying "We do not torture" FeelTheLove Off-Topic 13 11-09-2005 10:13 AM
Torture... Thinkingaboutit R171 SLK-Class 4 10-22-2005 07:59 PM

Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Title goes here

video goes here
description goes here. Read Full Story
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome