Date registered: Apr 2004
Location: The BlueGrass State
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
Well, considering how NONE of the group was able OR willing to address the problem back in 2006-2007 when it was already significant and, at the time still controllable, it seems to me that none have credibility.
Why would anyone keep a broker that kept you in a market a year after its foundation was cracking, why would anyone keep watching a show that only acted as a cheerleader for the market and a sales pitchman for financial products?
From a viewer perspective it seems like a bad judgment to keep watching and from a programmer director's perspective it seems like a bad judgment to keep the same voices and faces.
Being smart is knowing the difference, in a sticky situation between a well delivered anecdote and a well delivered antidote - bear.