Second Thoughts On The Meltdown - Mercedes-Benz Forum

LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
post #1 of 3 (permalink) Old 02-23-2009, 11:23 AM Thread Starter
Surely A Large Human
Qubes's Avatar
Date registered: Jun 2006
Vehicle: '08 C219
Location: Between Earth and Mars
Posts: 34,234
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Quoted: 482 Post(s)
Lifetime Premium Member
(Thread Starter)
Second Thoughts On The Meltdown

Interesting article for your review and opinion.

Maybe the meltdown was not what you think - MarketWatch

NEW YORK (MarketWatch) -- Everyone knows the crash of 2008 was caused by financial deregulation except Thomas E. Woods, who blames financial regulation, in the shape of the Federal Reserve.

Wood's new book, "Meltdown: A Free Market Look At Why the Stock Market Collapsed, the Economy Tanked and Government Bailouts Will Make Things Worse" (Regnery), has just made it to the New York Times best-seller list without the benefit of any major reviews.

That's par for the course for Woods, a fellow of the Auburn, Ala.-based Ludwig von Mises Institute, advocates of "Austrian economics," a particularly embattled faction of free market economists -- all of whom are pretty embattled, or out of fashion, right now.

The Austrian school argues that business cycles are driven by central banks keeping interest rates too low, expanding credit and encouraging uneconomic investments, creating an unsustainable boom, inevitably followed by a bust.
That's what happened here, says Woods, most recently with the Fed's multiple interest rate cuts to stave off the 2000-2002 slowdown.

Certainly debt levels had reached historic highs before the crash. (See June 1, 2008 column).

Woods argues the crash of 2008 was a perfect storm. Other elements included immense government pressure on mortgage lenders to loosen standards and make loans to questionably credit-worthy but politically favored demographic groups; and securitization, which spread the effects of bad mortgage lending around the world.

Recovery from even serious business cycle downturns can be swift, says Woods, citing the almost-forgotten 1920-1921 slump. But that's because the federal government did not step in. It allowed excesses to correct themselves. In contrast, the federal government did step in after 1929, as Japan's government did in a similar downturn after 1990. Result, according to Woods: the Great Depression in the U.S.; 18 years of stagnation in Japan.
If Woods is right, public policy is on exactly the wrong course right now in trying to sustain demand and asset prices, just as it was in the early years of the Depression. Ironically, this wrong course is bipartisan. Both Hebert Hoover and George W. Bush, Woods notes, were highly interventionist presidents just like their successors, contrary to myth.

Woods' cheerful prediction: prolonged stagnation, eventual inflation and an even bigger collapse.

Nobody wants to hear this argument, least of all Wall Street, which has benefitted enormously from the boom and now appears to be benefiting (some of it) from the bust. I've argued before that a second Pujo Committee is needed to look into some of the suspect stuff that's gone on. (See Sept. 29, 2008 column)

Of course, you have to be careful. The Pujo Committee led to the creation of the Federal Reserve.

I do have a couple of questions about Woods' work:

Why didn't this decade's credit expansion show up in consumer price inflation?
(Wood's suggestion: something similar happened in the 1920s. Expansionary monetary policy met a supply surge -- just like the recent falling price of computer power -- resulting in apparently stable prices.)

What about the U.S. dollar-Chinese yuan peg? Arguably, China's determination to keep its currency underpriced relative to the dollar has been a statist intervention in the global economy to match that of the Fed in the U.S. domestic economy. (See Oct. 19, 2006 column)

China's motive may be "exchange-rate mercantilism" -- maximizing its manufacturing capacity rather than living standards. Washington's complaisance may be because China buys U.S. Treasury bonds, thus bankrolling federal government spending (while bankrupting U.S. manufacturers).

Yet it could strengthen his case -- an undervalued yuan would have meant lower import prices, which would have masked inflation by keeping U.S. consumer prices low.
Qubes is offline  
Sponsored Links
post #2 of 3 (permalink) Old 02-23-2009, 11:59 AM
BenzWorld Elite
FeelTheLove's Avatar
Date registered: Sep 2004
Vehicle: 83 Astral Silver 280 SL
Location: Planet Houston
Posts: 28,829
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Quoted: 7 Post(s)
He is essentially saying "If the government just looked away even more, we would have been ok". I'm not buying it. I think the weak response to the Enron fiasco, where only a couple of guys went to jail and little new regulation resulted, was the real start of the meltdown. It was all down hill from there.

Recall that earlier generations faced down fascism and communism not just with missiles and tanks, but with sturdy alliances and enduring convictions. They understood that our power alone cannot protect us, nor does it entitle us to do as we please. Instead, they knew that our power grows through its prudent use; our security emanates from the justness of our cause, the force of our example, the tempering qualities of humility and restraint.

-President Barack Obama, 1st Inaugural address
FeelTheLove is offline  
post #3 of 3 (permalink) Old 02-23-2009, 12:27 PM
BenzWorld Elite
mcbear's Avatar
Date registered: Apr 2004
Vehicle: E500Es
Location: The BlueGrass State
Posts: 29,579
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
He wrote his book too soon. Only about 1/3 of the evidence on the current situation is in play yet.

The rest will have to play out before he can determine if Austrian has a hold of this. There is SOME merit to it. But Austrian doesn't address the global dynamics that are in play very well.


Being smart is knowing the difference, in a sticky situation between a well delivered anecdote and a well delivered antidote - bear.
mcbear is offline  
Sponsored Links

  Mercedes-Benz Forum > General Mercedes-Benz Forums > Off-Topic

Quick Reply

Register Now

In order to be able to post messages on the Mercedes-Benz Forum forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.

User Name:
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Email Address:


  • Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
    Thread Tools
    Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
    Email this Page Email this Page
    Display Modes
    Linear Mode Linear Mode

    Similar Threads
    Topic Author Forum Replies Last Post
    Electrical Meltdown Lotzacars G-Class 2 02-01-2009 10:35 AM
    Electrical meltdown. . . ensignthomas36 W126 S,SE,SEC,SEL,SD,SDL Class 6 07-18-2007 06:43 PM
    Iraq: Meltdown FeelTheLove Off-Topic 151 02-17-2007 01:39 PM
    Macaca Meltdown FeelTheLove Off-Topic 7 09-27-2006 09:25 AM
    GOP: Meltdown FeelTheLove Off-Topic 11 05-24-2005 09:43 PM

    Posting Rules  
    You may post new threads
    You may post replies
    You may not post attachments
    You may not edit your posts

    BB code is On
    Smilies are On
    [IMG] code is On
    HTML code is Off
    Trackbacks are On
    Pingbacks are On
    Refbacks are On


    Title goes here

    video goes here
    description goes here. Read Full Story
    For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome