Karl Rove still appears to be under the impression that the law does not apply to him. If Congress is smart, they'll begin proceedings against him but make sure any judgement comes after January '09, just to make sure Rove doesn't get a last minute get-out-of-jail-free card from GWB.
globeandmail.com: Rove spurns subpoena to testify to Congress
Rove spurns subpoena to testify to Congress
July 10, 2008 at 12:36 PM EDT
WASHINGTON â€” Former White House adviser Karl Rove defied a congressional subpoena and refused to testify Thursday about allegations of political pressure at the Justice Department, including whether he influenced the prosecution of a former Democratic governor of Alabama.
Chairwoman Linda Sanchez ruled with backing from fellow Democrats on the House subcommittee that Mr. Rove was breaking the law by refusing to co-operate, marking perhaps the first step toward holding him in contempt of Congress.
Congress subpoenaed Nr, Rove in May in an effort to force him to talk about whether he played a role in prosecutors' decisions to pursue cases against Democrats, such as former Alabama governor Don Siegelman or in firing federal prosecutors considered disloyal to the Bush administration.
Mr. Rove had been scheduled to appear at the House Judiciary subcommittee hearing Thursday morning. A placard with his name sat in front of an empty chair at the witness table, with a handful of protesters behind it calling for Mr. Rove to be arrested.
A decision on whether to pursue contempt charges now goes to the full Judiciary Committee and ultimately to House Speaker Nancy Pelosi.
House Republicans called Thursday's proceedings a political stunt and said if Democrats truly wanted information they would take Mr. Rove up on an offer he made to discuss the matter informally.
The House has already voted to hold two of U.S. President George W. Bush's confidants in contempt for failing to co-operate with its inquiry into whether the administration fired nine federal prosecutors in 2006 for political reasons.
The case, involving White House chief of staff Josh Bolten and former White House counsel Harriet Miers, is in federal court and may not be resolved before Mr. Bush's term ends in January.
The White House has cited executive privilege, arguing that internal administration communications are confidential and that Congress cannot compel officials to testify.
Mr. Rove insists he is bound to follow the White House's guidance, although he has offered to answer questions specifically on the Siegelman case provided he not be under oath and no transcript be taken.
Democrats have rejected the offer because the testimony would not be sworn and, they say, could create a confusing record.
Mr. Rove has insisted publicly that he never tried to influence Justice Department decisions and was not even aware of the Siegelman prosecution until it landed in the news.
Mr. Siegelman â€“ an unusually successful Democrat in a heavily Republican state â€“ was charged with accepting and concealing a contribution to his campaign to start a state education lottery, in exchange for appointing a hospital executive to a regulatory board.
He was sentenced last year to more than seven years in prison but was released in March when a federal appeals court ruled that Mr. Siegelman had raised â€śsubstantial questions of fact and lawâ€ť in his appeal.
Mr. Siegelman and others have alleged that the prosecution was pushed by Republican party operatives â€“ including Mr. Rove, a longtime Texas strategist who was heavily involved in Alabama politics before working at the White House. A former Republican campaign volunteer from Alabama told congressional attorneys last year that she overheard conversations suggesting that Mr. Rove pressed Justice officials in Washington to prosecute Mr. Siegelman.
The career prosecutors who handled the case have insisted that Mr. Rove had nothing to do with it, emphasizing that the former governor was convicted by a jury.