More on the Facade of Airline Security - Mercedes-Benz Forum

LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
post #1 of 5 (permalink) Old 04-17-2008, 11:11 AM Thread Starter
Surely A Large Human
Qubes's Avatar
Date registered: Jun 2006
Vehicle: '08 C219
Location: Between Earth and Mars
Posts: 34,234
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Quoted: 482 Post(s)
Lifetime Premium Member
(Thread Starter)
More on the Facade of Airline Security

Ex-marshal: Air marshal training 'a national disgrace' -
Ex-marshal: Air marshal training 'a national disgrace'

SAN DIEGO, California (CNN) -- Their mission is to protect airline passengers from acts of terror on U.S. flights. But in a special investigation, former and current air marshals told CNN that the number of marshals assigned to police flights is so low that the federal agency overseeing them has drastically lowered its firearms and psychological testing standards just so it can qualify new hires.

More than a dozen current and former marshals told CNN that so many federal air marshals have resigned and are not being replaced that airport screeners are being employed to fill the dwindling ranks.

But the Transportation Security Administration, or TSA, says that's not true and the rate of those leaving has remained at 6.5 percent a year since 2001.

A former federal air marshal and weapons trainer who left the agency in 2006 after four years of service said the situation was so bad that managers at his office fudged the numbers by assigning marshals to short, no-risk flights.

The former marshal said that was done to make it appear that the percentage of manned flights was higher than it really was.

"I think it's a national disgrace,'' said the former marshal, who asked not to be identified because he still works in law enforcement. Watch Drew Griffin's investigative report »

The Federal Air Marshal Service was greatly expanded in the aftermath of the terror attacks on September 11, 2001, when flights to so-called "high risk cities" such as New York were given special air marshal manpower priority.

Assignments are "intelligence-driven" and "risk-based," the Federal Air Marshal Service told CNN in an e-mail. But many of the marshals interviewed said it had little to do with intelligence or risk and was more about a numbers game.

"We were questioning how these flights could be intelligence-driven when we were flying from San Diego to Phoenix on another leg to Las Vegas back to Phoenix back to San Diego," said the former marshal. "It's not a threat flying on Southwest Airlines to Las Vegas."

Faced with fewer qualified applicants, current air marshals told CNN that recruiting standards have been lowered. Air marshals still patrolling flights also said the loss of so many experienced agents has led the TSA to hire airport screeners as air marshals. Agency spokesman Greg Alter said in an email that only "a very small number of air marshals started their careers as Transportation Security Officers [airport screeners]."

Alter added that all "candidates receive the best training available and enter the workforce with the skill and expertise needed to protect the traveling public."

In July 2006, the Federal Air Marshal Service sent out a memo saying new hires would no longer face mandatory psychological testing, unless the recruit admits that he or she has been treated for a mental condition. Read a copy of the memo »

TSA said it revised but did not "degrade" the psychological testing of applicants using the application and interaction with others in the service to determine mental competency.

On firearms training, a former weapons instructor with air marshals said when recruits could not pass the tough federal tactical pistol course, known as the TPC, it was replaced with a less rigorous shooting test the potential recruits could pass.

"The TPC went away very quickly because they couldn't get enough people through it to pass," said the former air marshal trainer. "So they dropped the tactical pistol course and went to the practical pistol course which is a standard federal law enforcement course. It's not nearly as quick or as dynamic as TPC."

But TSA disputes the claim, saying it altered the weapons training six years ago because marshals needed more of a police-type training program, rather than military-style weapons instruction.

TSA told CNN in an e-mail that "the course of fire and minimum qualification score air marshal candidates must acquire is the same today as it has been for over six years."

To replace departing air marshals, TSA hired internally, including some administrative staff who had no college, law enforcement or military backgrounds, one current marshal said.

"To me it's more of an embarrassment to be a member of that agency that would allow that particular individual in the training program," said one current marshal. "I wouldn't want them on my flight. ... I don't want them as my partner."

The revelations come in the wake of a recent CNN investigation, in which air marshals and pilots told CNN that only about 1 percent of the nation's 28,000 daily domestic flights were protected by onboard, armed federal marshals.

The Federal Air Marshal Service disputes that figure, and this week, in a congressional hearing, the head of the Transportation Security Administration, Kip Hawley, told members of Congress what CNN heard from the air marshals is wrong.

"I have to just correct on the factual basis on the CNN report about air marshals covering 1 percent. That number is absolutely wrong by an order of magnitude and it was a guess by the folks there, and I just have to say that number is completely false."

Hawley would not say what percentage of flights has air marshals. That's a national security secret.

The service hides behind national security to keep the public from knowing how thin coverage really is, air marshals told CNN.

The Federal Air Marshal Service continues to refuse CNN's request for an interview.

CNN's report about the declining number of marshals flying on planes also got the attention of Congress.

This month, Democratic Rep. Sheila Jackson Lee of Texas, who serves on the Homeland Security Committee, began holding closed door meetings with the air marshal's service to determine if congressional oversight committees are getting the truth.

"We will keep working and continuing to make sure that the airlines are served with the appropriate law enforcement that ensures the safety of the traveling public. We, too, are not interested in having funny numbers," Jackson Lee said.

Jackson Lee said the committee has not finished its work, and she is convinced American air travel is safe for passengers. "It is important to restate and to re-emphasize: This is not an open opportunity for those who would attempt to do Americans harm, We are light years from where we were in 2000. We have trained personnel. They're being utilized and we feel that we are steps ahead of where we were, but we want to get better. And that's what we intend to do."

After seeing CNN's initial report, Democratic Sen. John Kerry of Massachusetts sent a letter to Homeland Security chief Michael Chertoff asking for clarity on the number of air marshals protecting domestic flights and sought a response by April 11.

The senator is still waiting, Kerry's staff said.
Qubes is offline  
Sponsored Links
post #2 of 5 (permalink) Old 04-17-2008, 11:46 AM
BenzWorld Junior Member
Sal Collaziano's Avatar
Date registered: Mar 2008
Vehicle: 2005 Cadillac Escalade ESV
Location: West Palm Beach, Florida
Posts: 7
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
There's a LOT of security issues going on lately. I know someone who works closely with airport security and he slipped a couple of times, recently.. It's bad...
Sal Collaziano is offline  
post #3 of 5 (permalink) Old 04-17-2008, 11:53 AM
Lifetime Premium Member
Shane's Avatar
Date registered: Aug 2002
Vehicle: And what was left was what was guilt was what u gave to me
Location: A cavalcade of strangers came to tear ur world apart
Posts: 41,528
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Quoted: 1728 Post(s)
Lifetime Premium Member
I would make an exemplary Air Marshall. Think of the fun!
Shane is offline  
post #4 of 5 (permalink) Old 04-17-2008, 02:11 PM
BenzWorld Elite
Smackrattle's Avatar
Date registered: Nov 2005
Posts: 12,390
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Quoted: 146 Post(s)
Originally Posted by Shane View Post
I would make an exemplary Air Marshall. Think of the fun!

Smackrattle is online now  
post #5 of 5 (permalink) Old 04-17-2008, 02:57 PM Thread Starter
Surely A Large Human
Qubes's Avatar
Date registered: Jun 2006
Vehicle: '08 C219
Location: Between Earth and Mars
Posts: 34,234
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Quoted: 482 Post(s)
Lifetime Premium Member
(Thread Starter)
^ I think he'd enjoy drawing down on and yelling at whatever passenger looked most likely to lose control of their bowels.
Qubes is offline  
Sponsored Links

  Mercedes-Benz Forum > General Mercedes-Benz Forums > Off-Topic

Quick Reply

Register Now

In order to be able to post messages on the Mercedes-Benz Forum forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.

User Name:
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Email Address:


  • Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
    Thread Tools
    Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
    Email this Page Email this Page
    Display Modes
    Linear Mode Linear Mode

    Similar Threads
    Topic Author Forum Replies Last Post
    Surge Propaganda facade crumbles as troops tell it like it is FeelTheLove Off-Topic 169 09-27-2007 07:08 AM
    The Best Airline DP Off-Topic 8 06-05-2007 05:39 PM
    More on the would-be airline bombers... Check Codes Off-Topic 10 08-19-2006 01:39 AM
    Customer-friendly airline Dutchbenz Off-Topic 5 04-28-2006 07:54 AM
    customer-friendly airline pt.II yoseyman Off-Topic 0 04-26-2006 05:03 PM

    Posting Rules  
    You may post new threads
    You may post replies
    You may not post attachments
    You may not edit your posts

    BB code is On
    Smilies are On
    [IMG] code is On
    HTML code is Off
    Trackbacks are On
    Pingbacks are On
    Refbacks are On


    Title goes here

    video goes here
    description goes here. Read Full Story
    For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome