Wealth and Religiosity - Mercedes-Benz Forum

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
post #1 of 29 (permalink) Old 02-19-2008, 01:49 PM Thread Starter
BenzWorld Elite
 
Jayhawk's Avatar
 
Date registered: Aug 2005
Vehicle: S500/W220/2000
Location: Lawrence, KS (USA)
Posts: 21,652
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
(Thread Starter)
Wealth and Religiosity

I'm not sure what to make of this graph, but am sure some you will have an opinion--probably wrong, but an opinion nontheless...

This graph was in the March 2008 Atlantic magazine.



It comes from the Pew Global Attitudes Project, a survey of over 45,000 people.

In the full report, they also compare the results to five years ago. Venezuela and Germany had the greatest increase in religiosity, whereas Ukraine and India the greatest decrease. And the consensus of 46 out of 47 countries is that religion should be kept separate from government policy.

Definition: Religiosity is measured using a three-item index ranging from 0-3, with 3 representing the maximum religious position. Respondents were given a +1 if they believe faith in God is necessary for morality; and +1 if they say religion is very important in their lives; and +1 if they pray at least once a day.

Wealth and Religiosity on Flickr - Photo Sharing!

Don't believe everything you think

Last edited by Jayhawk; 02-19-2008 at 01:52 PM.
Jayhawk is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #2 of 29 (permalink) Old 02-19-2008, 01:52 PM
DP
Moderator
 
DP's Avatar
 
Date registered: Aug 2002
Vehicle: 190E, 400E, SLK350
Location: Chesapeak Bay
Posts: 64,125
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Quoted: 991 Post(s)
Lifetime Premium Member
It's good to be Swedish
DP is offline  
post #3 of 29 (permalink) Old 02-19-2008, 02:18 PM
Surely A Large Human
 
Qubes's Avatar
 
Date registered: Jun 2006
Vehicle: '08 C219
Location: Between Earth and Mars
Posts: 34,252
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Quoted: 493 Post(s)
Lifetime Premium Member
My opinion is that Jayhawk is a vacuous, condescending, disingenuous, facetious, lying tit. As he'll point out though, it's probably wrong.
Qubes is offline  
post #4 of 29 (permalink) Old 02-19-2008, 02:20 PM
DP
Moderator
 
DP's Avatar
 
Date registered: Aug 2002
Vehicle: 190E, 400E, SLK350
Location: Chesapeak Bay
Posts: 64,125
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Quoted: 991 Post(s)
Lifetime Premium Member
I know what you mean, I have a feeling that he's a liberal
DP is offline  
post #5 of 29 (permalink) Old 02-19-2008, 02:23 PM
BenzWorld Elite
 
mcbear's Avatar
 
Date registered: Apr 2004
Vehicle: E500Es
Location: The BlueGrass State
Posts: 29,579
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
At first I thought the chart was simply Bush's economic policies graphed out but then I read the fine print.

What will be interesting is if we take the thread that discusses the US population moving toward 450 Million by 2050 most by immigration, combine that with one of the threads on the US moving its manufacturing base outside the US which changes it's overall pC/GDP as the population increases and then juxtapose one of the threads that addresses the vast differences between the various religions in the US as opposed to most countries which have a more consistent religious view [lack of extremists like our Evangelical Christians].

Taking those three simple elements that are occurring in the US at this time at at exaggerated time frames [mass influx of immigrants, extreme changes in manufacturing to offshore, rise in evangelical movement] it would be interesting to extrapolate what the future position of the US would be on that chart, say in 25 more years.

Will it move to the left and UP? If so, what does that do for our status quo?



Good find Jay. This is actually a VERY interesting topic. Much more so than you might have thought.

McBear,
Kentucky

Being smart is knowing the difference, in a sticky situation between a well delivered anecdote and a well delivered antidote - bear.
mcbear is offline  
post #6 of 29 (permalink) Old 02-19-2008, 02:25 PM
DP
Moderator
 
DP's Avatar
 
Date registered: Aug 2002
Vehicle: 190E, 400E, SLK350
Location: Chesapeak Bay
Posts: 64,125
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Quoted: 991 Post(s)
Lifetime Premium Member
Quote:
Originally Posted by mcbear View Post
At first I thought the chart was simply Bush's economic policies graphed out but then I read the fine print.

What will be interesting is if we take the thread that discusses the US population moving toward 450 Million by 2050 most by immigration, combine that with one of the threads on the US moving its manufacturing base outside the US which changes it's overall pC/GDP as the population increases and then juxtapose one of the threads that addresses the vast differences between the various religions in the US as opposed to most countries which have a more consistent religious view [lack of extremists like our Evangelical Christians].

Taking those three simple elements that are occurring in the US at this time at at exaggerated time frames [mass influx of immigrants, extreme changes in manufacturing to offshore, rise in evangelical movement] it would be interesting to extrapolate what the future position of the US would be on that chart, say in 25 more years.

Will it move to the left and UP? If so, what does that do for our status quo?



Good find Jay. This is actually a VERY interesting topic. Much more so than you might have thought.
You mean a Banana Republic?
DP is offline  
post #7 of 29 (permalink) Old 02-19-2008, 02:28 PM Thread Starter
BenzWorld Elite
 
Jayhawk's Avatar
 
Date registered: Aug 2005
Vehicle: S500/W220/2000
Location: Lawrence, KS (USA)
Posts: 21,652
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
(Thread Starter)
Quote:
Originally Posted by QBNCGAR View Post
My opinion is that Jayhawk is a vacuous, condescending, disingenuous, facetious, lying tit. ....
My guess is the only word above that you didn't have to look-up was "tit..."

Don't believe everything you think
Jayhawk is offline  
post #8 of 29 (permalink) Old 02-19-2008, 02:37 PM Thread Starter
BenzWorld Elite
 
Jayhawk's Avatar
 
Date registered: Aug 2005
Vehicle: S500/W220/2000
Location: Lawrence, KS (USA)
Posts: 21,652
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
(Thread Starter)
Quote:
Originally Posted by mcbear View Post
At first I thought the chart was simply Bush's economic policies graphed out but then I read the fine print.

What will be interesting is if we take the thread that discusses the US population moving toward 450 Million by 2050 most by immigration, combine that with one of the threads on the US moving its manufacturing base outside the US which changes it's overall pC/GDP as the population increases and then juxtapose one of the threads that addresses the vast differences between the various religions in the US as opposed to most countries which have a more consistent religious view [lack of extremists like our Evangelical Christians].

Taking those three simple elements that are occurring in the US at this time at at exaggerated time frames [mass influx of immigrants, extreme changes in manufacturing to offshore, rise in evangelical movement] it would be interesting to extrapolate what the future position of the US would be on that chart, say in 25 more years.

Will it move to the left and UP? If so, what does that do for our status quo?



Good find Jay. This is actually a VERY interesting topic. Much more so than you might have thought.
Your pedantic interpretation of a rather simple graph makes me think it may be a less interesting topic than I originally thought!

Don't believe everything you think
Jayhawk is offline  
post #9 of 29 (permalink) Old 02-19-2008, 02:38 PM Thread Starter
BenzWorld Elite
 
Jayhawk's Avatar
 
Date registered: Aug 2005
Vehicle: S500/W220/2000
Location: Lawrence, KS (USA)
Posts: 21,652
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
(Thread Starter)
Quote:
Originally Posted by drewprof View Post
You mean a Banana Republic?
I didn't see any bananas on that graph...

Don't believe everything you think
Jayhawk is offline  
post #10 of 29 (permalink) Old 02-19-2008, 02:43 PM
DP
Moderator
 
DP's Avatar
 
Date registered: Aug 2002
Vehicle: 190E, 400E, SLK350
Location: Chesapeak Bay
Posts: 64,125
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Quoted: 991 Post(s)
Lifetime Premium Member
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jayhawk View Post
I didn't see any bananas on that graph...
You must have missed the monkey too
DP is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Reply

  Mercedes-Benz Forum > General Mercedes-Benz Forums > Off-Topic

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now



In order to be able to post messages on the Mercedes-Benz Forum forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.

User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.

Password:


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Email Address:
OR

Log-in











  • Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
     
    Thread Tools
    Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
    Email this Page Email this Page
    Display Modes
    Linear Mode Linear Mode



    Similar Threads
    Topic Author Forum Replies Last Post
    Where Do You Stand on America's Wealth Spectrum? Jakarta Expat Off-Topic 1 11-06-2007 06:01 AM
    Clinton can boast wealth of earmarks GeeS Off-Topic 6 06-14-2007 08:29 AM
    This forum is a wealth of information rudedude W163 M-Class 4 04-30-2007 11:55 AM
    Iraqis agree to share the wealth Qubes Off-Topic 19 02-27-2007 06:31 PM
    Wealth of Nations Botnst Off-Topic 6 07-30-2006 05:14 PM

    Posting Rules  
    You may post new threads
    You may post replies
    You may not post attachments
    You may not edit your posts

    BB code is On
    Smilies are On
    [IMG] code is On
    HTML code is Off
    Trackbacks are On
    Pingbacks are On
    Refbacks are On

     

    Title goes here

    close
    video goes here
    description goes here. Read Full Story
    For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome