Calif Health plan fails; Candidates oblivious - Mercedes-Benz Forum

 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
post #1 of 4 (permalink) Old 02-01-2008, 08:31 PM Thread Starter
BenzWorld Elite
 
Date registered: Jul 2007
Vehicle: 1973 450 SL
Location: Castle Rock, CO
Posts: 5,453
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
(Thread Starter)
Calif Health plan fails; Candidates oblivious

A Clear Choice

INVESTOR'S BUSINESS DAILY
Posted 2/1/2008
Health Care: Reform schemes are failing because they cost too much, and there are only two ways to cut those costs: competition or government controls. Which will it be?

Last week's collapse of Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger's plan to overhaul health care in California was a teaching moment for all politicians, including would-be presidents. However you parsed it, the 7-1 vote by the Democrat-led state Senate Health Committee to scrap the $14.9-billion proposal came down to the issue of affordability.

There was no way to make this complex public-private scheme pencil out without putting an undue burden on the shoulders of employers, low-income workers, insurers and the taxpayers. As painful as the state's budget shortfall may be, in this case it was blessing.

It made typically free-spending legislators think twice about saddling Californians with a new budget-busting program. Some may claim to be disappointed. But far more, we would guess, are relieved.
So far, the demise of Arnoldcare doesn't seem to have changed the talk on the campaign trail (from the Democratic side) about patching together something similar on a national scale.

Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama both back mandates on individuals to buy coverage — a key part of the California plan, as with the Massachusetts plan signed by Mitt Romney when he was governor. The main difference is that Obama limits the mandate to coverage of children, while Clinton would leave no one out.

Neither seems to see the California story as relevant. Nor do they seem to notice that the much-smaller Massachusetts program has now racked up $400 million in cost overruns as low-income people flock to state-subsidized coverage after finding that the mandated private insurance was too much for their family budgets.

The failure of these universal-coverage plans does support the Democrats' argument that meaningful health care reform has to be national. But the answer is not to subject the whole country to ideas that don't work at the state level. What the country needs is a shift in priorities, from extending coverage to attacking costs.

Once that decision is made — to make affordability, not scope of coverage, the first objective — then there's a clear choice to make. Policymakers have just two options if they want to reduce the cost of something: They can stimulate competition or impose price controls.

Controls can be in the form of regulations or take-it-or-leave it deals based on the government's buying power. The more they work to hold down costs, the more they limit services and choices for the consumer. If they don't work, they let programs grow into budget-eating monsters, like Medicare.

Control is the norm in most of the world's health care. Competition is the insurgent model. It's getting a test in the Medicare prescription drug program, which actually has cost less than expected. Democrats still recoil at it, but Republicans are coming to understand and embrace it.

Its key idea is to give every individual a real choice of insurers and plan types, with incentives for buying frugally and choosing the one that delivers the best coverage and care for the money.

The incentives could be provided by tax-favored savings accounts (HSAs, expanded to cover premium payments as well as out-of-pocket costs) and limits on the tax-deductibility of premiums.

The harder part would be to provide the true competition, which is now being held back by a system of state-by-state regulation that loads costly mandates on insurers and stands in the way of a national insurance market.

Congress created the current regulatory regime and could get rid of it (there's no constitutional barrier here), but the political climate would have to change first. Democrats will have to stop scoring cheap points by demonizing the insurance business. They'll have to recognize that insurers are part of the solution, not the problem, and that profit in health care is not a dirty word

Charter member of the Vast Rightwing Conspiracy and proud of it.

God Bless the America we're trying to create.
--Hillary Rodham Clinton

Last edited by bottomline1; 02-01-2008 at 08:35 PM. Reason: Readability
bottomline1 is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #2 of 4 (permalink) Old 02-01-2008, 09:06 PM
~BANNED~
 
Jakarta Expat's Avatar
 
Date registered: Aug 2006
Vehicle: PM me to Join the Expat Muslims for Obama Club........
Location: Jakarta, Indonesia
Posts: 17,697
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
Mandating someone to buy healthcare like the plan of the lying, shithead cunt of a snake in the grass bitch, is that legal?
Jakarta Expat is offline  
post #3 of 4 (permalink) Old 02-01-2008, 09:23 PM
BenzWorld Elite
 
mcbear's Avatar
 
Date registered: Apr 2004
Vehicle: E500Es
Location: The BlueGrass State
Posts: 29,579
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
Do you remember the fun and excitement of Corporate competition with HMOs in the 1980s?

The government bailout of that failed corporate management of the healthcare industry was in the multi-Billions in 1980-90 dollars.

It was also responsible for much of the high costs associated with your and my current premiums.

If you wish to see two interesting parallels to the HMO mess, just look at the Saving and Loan issue and it's bailout and the current Financial Sector/Mortgage Industry bailout. All three are fine examples of Free Market, UnRegulated Corporate "let competition define the market" economic engines. All three seized up.

McBear,
Kentucky

Being smart is knowing the difference, in a sticky situation between a well delivered anecdote and a well delivered antidote - bear.
mcbear is offline  
post #4 of 4 (permalink) Old 02-01-2008, 09:28 PM
BenzWorld Elite
 
mcbear's Avatar
 
Date registered: Apr 2004
Vehicle: E500Es
Location: The BlueGrass State
Posts: 29,579
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
The system need fixed. This country is too good to have 50 Million people unable to go to the doctor because they can't afford or can't get health insurance.

So far, the Corporate world has failed to prove they are capable of executing the task. They have had decades and not stepped up to the plate. Their one major attempt into managed care was a fiasco of epic proportion.

Is government better? We don't know. We can assume but as they say about that...

I am guessing a hybrid is the answer. There MUST be an answer. It is not a question that can or will go away.

McBear,
Kentucky

Being smart is knowing the difference, in a sticky situation between a well delivered anecdote and a well delivered antidote - bear.
mcbear is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Reply

  Mercedes-Benz Forum > General Mercedes-Benz Forums > Off-Topic

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now



In order to be able to post messages on the Mercedes-Benz Forum forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.

User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.

Password:


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Email Address:
OR

Log-in











  • Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
     
    Thread Tools
    Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
    Email this Page Email this Page
    Display Modes
    Linear Mode Linear Mode



    Similar Threads
    Topic Author Forum Replies Last Post
    Candidates for the Darwin Award Nutz 4 Benz Off-Topic 71 09-03-2015 11:17 PM
    Cali health plan failing mlfun Off-Topic 0 01-29-2008 12:58 AM
    Let's make this an issue for the candidates Qubes Off-Topic 7 01-14-2008 01:05 PM
    Unpromising Times: Primary elections and secondary candidates... Jayhawk Off-Topic 0 12-26-2007 10:14 AM
    Home for the candidates... Jayhawk Off-Topic 3 12-25-2007 01:35 PM

    Posting Rules  
    You may post new threads
    You may post replies
    You may not post attachments
    You may not edit your posts

    BB code is On
    Smilies are On
    [IMG] code is On
    HTML code is Off
    Trackbacks are On
    Pingbacks are On
    Refbacks are On

     

    Title goes here

    close
    video goes here
    description goes here. Read Full Story
    For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome