Managing the occupation - Mercedes-Benz Forum

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
post #1 of 22 (permalink) Old 12-19-2007, 12:11 AM Thread Starter
CH4S Artist
 
Teutone's Avatar
 
Date registered: Sep 2004
Vehicle: 1985 500SEC, 1991 190E 2.6.
Location: Los Angeles / Hannover Germany
Posts: 33,570
Mentioned: 11 Post(s)
Quoted: 958 Post(s)
Lifetime Premium Member
(Thread Starter)
Managing the occupation

Managing the occupation
By Lamis Andoni, Al Jazeera Middle East analyst


Aid agencies have warned of a humanitarian disaster in the Palestinian territories [EPA]

On the face of it, the one-day international donor meeting in Paris was a fantastic success.

Billions of dollars were promised in aid to the Palestinian Authority to salvage its ailing economy, and all the while political rhetoric flew about in support of Palestinian statehood.

But financial pledges, even if and when they are delivered to the Palestinians, are meaningless in the long term without the exertion of international political pressure to end the 40-year old Israeli occupation of the West Bank and the Gaza Strip.

"This is not a donors' conference. This a state-building conference," declared Tony Blair, the Middle East peace quartet's envoy, in his speech at the meeting.

In his opening speech, Nicolas Sarkozy, the French president, called for an end of the occupation and for an independent Palestinian state to be established within a year in the West Bank, East Jerusalem and the Gaza Strip.

Such statements, while politically significant, sound vacuous unless the international community reaches a consensus to pressure Israel not only to stop, but also to reverse its settlement building that has rendered statehood a shattered Palestinian dream.

No 'show of will'

"In Paris there was neither a show of an international political will to address the occupation itself nor any serious pressure placed on Israel to lift restrictions on the movement of people and goods"
This is not to underestimate the urgency of the flow of immediate aid - every single dollar is direly needed to avert an impending catastrophe that the United Nations and other humanitarian organisations have already cautioned against.

Yet in the absence of a clearly defined political plan, financial aid will amount to no more than a sticking plaster that cannot stop a profusely bleeding wound.

In Paris there was neither a show of an international political will to address the occupation itself nor any serious pressure placed on Israel to lift restrictions on the movement of people and goods.

Warnings by the World Bank that an Israeli reversal of movement restriction policies and closure of borders is a pre-requisite for the recovery of the Palestinian economy, went unheeded.

The donors' conference, as the American-sponsored Annapolis meeting a few weeks ago, was instead driven by Israeli and US security priorities, namely backing, if not, encouraging a Palestinian Authority confrontation against Hamas rather than addressing the reality of the Israeli occupation.

Fuelling divisions


Hamas's June takeover of Gaza pushed the
two Palestinian sides further apart [AFP]
The international community, following the lead of Washington, has been instrumental in fuelling Palestinian divisions, particularly since the international boycott of the Hamas-led government formed after the 2006 Islamic movement's victory in parliamentary elections.

But while the shift in the international agenda against Hamas has served US and Israeli framing of the problem of that "of Palestinian terrorism", both Fatah and Hamas share the main responsibility of facilitating an international consensus that has diverted attention from the Israeli occupation.

The PA's initial acquiescence in the international boycott of the Hamas-led government and security co-ordination with the US to strengthen its security against Hamas - even if that did not amount to practical steps - created an internal atmosphere of mistrust.

Meanwhile, Hamas's military takeover of Gaza last June provided an unprecedented opportunity for Israel to strangle an already suffocated 1.6 million Palestinians in the tiny strip and turned a geographic divide into a de facto political division of a frail Palestinian polity.

As a result, we saw a conference supposedly aimed at reviving peace negotiations in Maryland turn into an all-out "war on terrorism" pitting Palestinian against Palestinian and consequently pushing the fight against Israeli occupation on to the backburner.

The trend continued in Paris, even as Abbas tried in his speech to draw attention back to the reality on the ground.

"I expect them [the Israelis] to stop all settlement activities, without exceptions," he said.

He also called on Israel to remove dozens of unauthorised settlement outposts established since 2001, to remove military checkpoints and to stop building its separation wall in the West Bank.

Political tool?

There are currently 120 Israeli settlements in the West Bank including East Jerusalem, that amount to about 40 per cent of Palestinian land occupied by Israel in 1967.

But Abbas's demand is likely to fall on deaf ears. For while an international show of support - and infusion of millions of dollars - may strengthen his position against Hamas, it does not bolster the Palestinian position vis-a-vis Israel.

If anything, the conference has enabled Israel to stand its ground on its security conditions.

It has also practically absolved Israel from making commitments to stop settlement expansion and incursions and attacks against the Palestinian territories, and to ease the restrictions on movement in the West Bank and the Gaza Strip.

Indeed, the flow of aid - with the exception of UN-directed emergency relief funds - would be used as a political tool by some donors to pressure the PA to initiate a full-scale crackdown on Hamas, and even other opponents.

Divisive steps

US congress, in particular, is expected to make stricter stipulations for releasing all, or even part, of the $550m pledged by the US government to ensure that Abbas meets Israeli demands on dismantling armed wings of Hamas and Fatah.


Sarkozy has suggested deploying an
international peacekeeping force [AFP]
In other words, for the PA to even receive part of the promised aid, it has to take more divisive and harsh security steps that could prove very costly in the increasingly impoverished Palestinian territories.

In a revealing statement, Sarkozy suggested the beefing-up of the Palestinian security machinery against Hamas through the deployment of an international peacekeeping force.

This proposal reflected the Paris meeting's skewed priorities and could become a recipe for Palestinian civil war.

Thus, while the Paris meeting may have recognised the urgency of the deteriorating humanitarian situation, the political subtext of the donors' financial pledges will only feed the internal strife and enable Israel to manage, not end, the occupation.

Source: Al Jazeera
Teutone is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #2 of 22 (permalink) Old 12-19-2007, 12:19 AM
~BANNED~
 
Date registered: Aug 2002
Posts: 41,649
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Quoted: 1761 Post(s)
What a mess, no easy answers. I for one am for trying to cool the radicals so give the Palestinians a bone and see if it does not alienate Israel too much.
Shane is offline  
post #3 of 22 (permalink) Old 12-19-2007, 06:45 AM
DP
Moderator
 
DP's Avatar
 
Date registered: Aug 2002
Vehicle: 190E, 400E, SLK350
Location: Chesapeak Bay
Posts: 64,125
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Quoted: 991 Post(s)
Lifetime Premium Member
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shane View Post
What a mess, no easy answers. I for one am for trying to cool the radicals so give the Palestinians a bone and see if it does not alienate Israel too much.
No bones, just be fair to both parties or stay the hell out.
DP is offline  
post #4 of 22 (permalink) Old 12-19-2007, 06:59 AM
~BANNED~
 
Jakarta Expat's Avatar
 
Date registered: Aug 2006
Vehicle: PM me to Join the Expat Muslims for Obama Club........
Location: Jakarta, Indonesia
Posts: 17,697
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
^^^^Exactly, regarding the US involvement, it has never been fair between the 2 groups. My biggest bitch about the whole damn thing.
Jakarta Expat is offline  
post #5 of 22 (permalink) Old 12-19-2007, 07:03 AM
BenzWorld Elite
 
Date registered: Sep 2004
Vehicle: 95 E300
Location: Inside my head
Posts: 36,850
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Quoted: 392 Post(s)
What is "fair" -- is it equal treatment?

Would we agree that all nations should be treated fairly?

Does that mean all nations should be treated equally?

B

The biggest problems we are facing right now have to do with George Bush trying to bring more and more power into the executive branch and not go through Congress at all and thatís what I intend to reverse.

~ Senator Barack H. Obama
Botnst is offline  
post #6 of 22 (permalink) Old 12-19-2007, 07:12 AM
~BANNED~
 
Jakarta Expat's Avatar
 
Date registered: Aug 2006
Vehicle: PM me to Join the Expat Muslims for Obama Club........
Location: Jakarta, Indonesia
Posts: 17,697
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
^^^The US should just butt the fuck out and stop supporting Israel as much as it does as it never gives the Palestinians the same equal treatment........
Jakarta Expat is offline  
post #7 of 22 (permalink) Old 12-19-2007, 07:19 AM
DP
Moderator
 
DP's Avatar
 
Date registered: Aug 2002
Vehicle: 190E, 400E, SLK350
Location: Chesapeak Bay
Posts: 64,125
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Quoted: 991 Post(s)
Lifetime Premium Member
Quote:
Originally Posted by Botnst View Post
What is "fair" -- is it equal treatment?

Would we agree that all nations should be treated fairly?

Does that mean all nations should be treated equally?

B
Don't broaden it to cheapen it
What's fair is simple:
1. Israel's right to exist
2. Palestinians living in their own well defined country or simply integrate them into Israel
3. The US must stop funding Egypt and Jordan for the "prevention" of a non-existing threat (they argue that they need to be balanced with Israel so there will be peace: Bullshit!)
4. Return the Golan to Syria
5. Focus on Israel and Palestine exclusively and get the hell out off Iraq You know when something keeps breaking, it's better to go to the source; what's the analogy in medicine again?
DP is offline  
post #8 of 22 (permalink) Old 12-19-2007, 07:29 AM
BenzWorld Elite
 
Date registered: Sep 2004
Vehicle: 95 E300
Location: Inside my head
Posts: 36,850
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Quoted: 392 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by drewprof View Post
Don't broaden it to cheapen it
What's fair is simple:
1. Israel's right to exist
2. Palestinians living in their own well defined country or simply integrate them into Israel
3. The US must stop funding Egypt and Jordan for the "prevention" of a non-existing threat (they argue that they need to be balanced with Israel so there will be peace: Bullshit!)
4. Return the Golan to Syria
5. Focus on Israel and Palestine exclusively and get the hell out off Iraq You know when something keeps breaking, it's better to go to the source; what's the analogy in medicine again?
Broaden to seek general rules. It seems simple to me. If we cannot answer the simple questions how can we possibly assume that complex questions are answerable?

What is "fair" -- is it equal treatment?

Would we agree that all nations should be treated fairly?

Does that mean all nations should be treated equally?

B

The biggest problems we are facing right now have to do with George Bush trying to bring more and more power into the executive branch and not go through Congress at all and thatís what I intend to reverse.

~ Senator Barack H. Obama
Botnst is offline  
post #9 of 22 (permalink) Old 12-19-2007, 07:41 AM
Administratoris Emeritus
 
GeeS's Avatar
 
Date registered: Aug 2002
Vehicle: 2021 SL770
Location: Fountain Hills, AZ
Posts: 44,915
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Quoted: 591 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jakarta Expat View Post
^^^The US should just butt the fuck out and stop supporting Israel as much as it does as it never gives the Palestinians the same equal treatment........
For the first time -- ever -- we actually agree on something. The U.S. should savagely curtail financial support to Israel, Egypt and Jordan, to bring it in line with the aid we offer other allies. Here is an old WRMEA piece that beats the point home like a sledgehammer: WRMEA: U.S. Aid to Israel

"If spending money you don't have is the height of stupidity, borrowing money to give it away is the height of insanity." -- anon
GeeS is offline  
post #10 of 22 (permalink) Old 12-19-2007, 07:44 AM
DP
Moderator
 
DP's Avatar
 
Date registered: Aug 2002
Vehicle: 190E, 400E, SLK350
Location: Chesapeak Bay
Posts: 64,125
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Quoted: 991 Post(s)
Lifetime Premium Member
Quote:
Originally Posted by Botnst View Post
Broaden to seek general rules. It seems simple to me. If we cannot answer the simple questions how can we possibly assume that complex questions are answerable?

What is "fair" -- is it equal treatment?

Would we agree that all nations should be treated fairly?

Does that mean all nations should be treated equally?

B
It's simple, we can speak of fairness if we intervene in someone's affairs. If we are not in the middle of a dispute and not funding any party say in the Land of Oz then there is no fairness to put forth as a criteria in dealing with feuds in the Land of Oz.
Once we took that path, that is we started to fund the Israelis to arm themselves, settle land, build walls and also pay bribes to Egypt and Jordan in the tune of billions so they don't bother Israel then fairness is an issue.
DP is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Reply

  Mercedes-Benz Forum > General Mercedes-Benz Forums > Off-Topic

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now



In order to be able to post messages on the Mercedes-Benz Forum forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.

User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.

Password:


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Email Address:
OR

Log-in











  • Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
     
    Thread Tools
    Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
    Email this Page Email this Page
    Display Modes
    Linear Mode Linear Mode



    Similar Threads
    Topic Author Forum Replies Last Post
    Can someone be for military action but not the Iraqi occupation? Shane Off-Topic 60 07-26-2007 08:24 AM
    what is your occupation? Streetglower Off-Topic 48 05-09-2007 10:44 AM
    What is everyone's occupation? McBain R171 SLK-Class 178 01-19-2007 12:29 PM
    occupation? my260e Off-Topic 38 04-10-2006 01:41 PM
    Why can't some people see that the Iraq occupation was a bad idea? Shane Off-Topic 64 11-20-2005 07:21 PM

    Posting Rules  
    You may post new threads
    You may post replies
    You may not post attachments
    You may not edit your posts

    BB code is On
    Smilies are On
    [IMG] code is On
    HTML code is Off
    Trackbacks are On
    Pingbacks are On
    Refbacks are On

     

    Title goes here

    close
    video goes here
    description goes here. Read Full Story
    For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome