Hey Science, Don't Mess with Texas - Mercedes-Benz Forum

LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
post #1 of 2 (permalink) Old 12-02-2007, 08:28 PM Thread Starter
Administratoris Emeritus
GeeS's Avatar
Date registered: Aug 2002
Vehicle: 2021 SL770
Location: Fountain Hills, AZ
Posts: 44,831
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Quoted: 544 Post(s)
(Thread Starter)
Hey Science, Don't Mess with Texas

Zach Marks / Huffington Post

It can't be a good thing when a state fires its head of science education for promoting science education. But that's what happened when the Texas Education Agency put its science curriculum director Chris Comer on administrative leave in late October, leading to what she calls a forced resignation.

We begin our story on October 26 when Comer forwarded an e-mail announcing a presentation titled, "Inside Creationism's Trojan Horse," by Barbara Forrest. Forrest co-authored a book arguing that creationist politics are advancing the movement to get intelligent design theory taught in public schools, and are doing so through public relations rather than through scientific research. Shortly after forwarding the e-mail, Comer was put on administrative leave.

"Ms. Comer's e-mail implies endorsement of the speaker and implies that TEA endorses the speaker's position on a subject on which the agency must remain neutral," according to the author of a TEA memo calling for Comer's firing.

The memo also criticizes Comer for failing to get permission to give a presentation at a conference and for suggesting there was a lack of leadership at the agency, but these offenses hardly seem grounds for a pink slip so let's focus on the statement above.

Does forwarding an e-mail really "impl[y] endorsement of the speaker?" Every day I forward more event-promoting e-mails than my Microsoft Outlook outbox knows what to do with. If I "endorsed the speakers" at half of them, you wouldn't be able to tell whether I was voting for Barack Obama, Ron Paul or Raffi. Comer's in charge of science education, so it makes sense that she'd forward an e-mail about a science education event. She sent the e-mail with the subject line, "FYI." For all we know, she does the same for hundreds of e-mails announcing presentations by intelligent design theory advocates too. That wouldn't make her an advocate of intelligent design theory, just an avid e-mail forwarder.

Does forwarding an e-mail really "impl[y] that TEA endorses the speaker's position"? We don't know whether Comer signed the e-mail "Sincerely, Chris Comer, Director of Science Curriculum, Texas Education Agency" or "xoxo, your old college girlfriend chrissy wissy," so even if Comer did privately endorse the speaker's position, we can't say whether she did so in her professional role. Although she did use her TEA e-mail account, it's still too big a jump to claim this implies agency endorsement of the speaker.

My third beef is the degree to which the agency's desire for "neutrality" stifles educational inquiry. Actually in this case it seemed to stifle Comer's effort to stay informed about current topics of controversy in her field. I understand it's the TEA's policy to "remain neutral" on the evolution-intelligent design debate, but the only thing this policy seems to do is politicize science education. "In most states, the department of education takes a leadership role in fostering sound science education. Apparently TEA employees are supposed to be kept in the closet and only let out to do the bidding of the Board [of Education]," Eugenie Scott, executive director of the National Center for Science Education.

This of course leads us to the Board of Education. (Thanks for the segue, Eugenie.) Comer had held her position for nine years, so what might have motivated the TEA to clear her office now? Perhaps the fact that next year the Texas Board of Education will review the state science curriculum and set standards for classroom instruction and textbook selection. My little conspiracy theory gets even better when you hear that the woman who led the charge to get rid of Comer just joined the TEA this year to become "senior adviser on statewide initiatives." (That woman, by the way, is Lizzette Reynolds, former deputy legislative director for Dubya when he was Texas guv and later a Bush appointee at the US Department of Education.) Might one of those statewide initiatives be inundating Texas children with intelligent design theory?

One closing note (thanks to my friends at The Great Beyond): In a recent international examination by the OECD of the performance of 15 year-olds in science, the United States scored significantly below average, finishing just behind Latvia. You might find it interesting to compare this chart showing where countries stand in the OECD rankings with this chart showing how much of their population believes in evolution. I'm not endorsing the position that people who believe in evolution are smarter. Just consider this a forwarded e-mail with the subject "FYI."

"If spending money you don't have is the height of stupidity, borrowing money to give it away is the height of insanity." -- anon
GeeS is offline  
Sponsored Links
post #2 of 2 (permalink) Old 12-02-2007, 09:06 PM
BenzWorld Elite
mcbear's Avatar
Date registered: Apr 2004
Vehicle: E500Es
Location: The BlueGrass State
Posts: 29,579
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
And when we add...

Texas math books contain 109,263 errors

Reviewers have found 109,263 errors in sample copies of math textbooks to be used in classrooms in the 2008 fall semester in Texas. If the printed books show any errors, the board of education fines at $5,000 per error.
The San Antonia Express News reported that text book reviewers from the State Board of Education found 109,263 errors. These books will be available next fall in Texas schools.

The errors are spread out over 164 textbooks and online materials are blamed on faulty translation from English to Spanish. But any translation machine would have no problems translating the numbers, so that excuse is weak (maybe they should attribute the errors to carelessness).

For example, one of the second grade math books contains simple errors such as 4+7=10. Other errors are found in answers to end of chapter quizzes.

The books' publishers are lucky to have been caught with errors this early; if the books had been printed and distributed to the Texas State Board of Education, the publishers would have been fined $5,000 per error. That would have been $500 million in penalties if all the 109,263 errors were printed in the books. Instead, the publishers will have enough time to correct these mistakes before they print and distribute.

Houghton Mifflin Co. is one publisher involved in this comedy of errors. Reports indicate the company is responsible for 79 per cent of the errors.

Anita Givens, senior director of educational technology at the Texas Education Agency, said in the years past they had no problems like this. In 2005, they found just one error after the books was released to the school.

In my opinion, the publishers should add a math checker feature in addition to the spell check for the future.

Digital Journal - Texas math books contain 109,263 errors

So who is responsible for the other 21%


Being smart is knowing the difference, in a sticky situation between a well delivered anecdote and a well delivered antidote - bear.
mcbear is offline  
Sponsored Links

  Mercedes-Benz Forum > General Mercedes-Benz Forums > Off-Topic

Quick Reply

Register Now

In order to be able to post messages on the Mercedes-Benz Forum forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.

User Name:
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Email Address:


  • Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
    Thread Tools
    Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
    Email this Page Email this Page
    Display Modes
    Linear Mode Linear Mode

    Similar Threads
    Topic Author Forum Replies Last Post
    science, science, science! Von Vorschlag Off-Topic 1 10-16-2007 03:47 AM
    Science Time DP Off-Topic 8 07-17-2007 02:10 PM
    Where is Texas? oops... Where IN Texas Steinebach922 Unimog 6 10-01-2006 06:44 PM
    Politicizing Science Shabah Off-Topic 15 02-11-2006 01:13 PM
    Hey Hey Hey, Can we say Happy Birthday to our Master;-) JimB W163 M-Class 6 04-25-2003 06:57 AM

    Posting Rules  
    You may post new threads
    You may post replies
    You may not post attachments
    You may not edit your posts

    BB code is On
    Smilies are On
    [IMG] code is On
    HTML code is Off
    Trackbacks are On
    Pingbacks are On
    Refbacks are On


    Title goes here

    video goes here
    description goes here. Read Full Story
    For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome