You think that's bad, you should see all the dead people that vote straight line Democrat in Baltimore. One would think they had voting booths in the cemeteries....
Maybe it is time for you to admit you are really a right wing Republican, with no apologies whatsoever for your stance.
Your vilification only really extends to what you see in Democrats.
Who was it who declaimed the other day "There is none so blind as he who will not see?"
__________________ "I swear to god, it's like I live in a trailer of common sense, and stare out the window at a tornado of stupidity."
I don't suppose you'd care to elaborate and/or document that... I'm quite familiar with Dr. Paul, and have never heard this so-called "conspiracy crap".
I love it when you kookbergers get Hoisted on your own petard... Is it early Alzheimer's or are you just off the deep end again?
Well, you've provided two links. One meaningless link to Google and another to freerepublic something or other that won't open ("Internet Explorer cannot display the webpage"). Try again? With something serious this time? Enquiring minds want to know.
I'm sure you're far too bright to make reference to the debate in which Dr. Paul did nothing more than cite the reasons Bin Laden attacked us according to the 9-11 Commission Report. That must have been quite the embarrassment for Giuliani, who was exposed as an ignorant lout who apparently (gasp!) hadn't even read the report.
Are you serious? I have now gained access to your second link, which appears to be some off the wall radical right wing blog site (?). It rather illiterately states that "Paul may not have explicitly accused the U.S. government or Mossad off the 9/11 terrorist attacks on conspiracy-oriented radio shows", and that is as damning as it gets, unless I've missed something. In fact, you or I could substitute the name of almost anyone in the entire world for "Paul", and the statement would be just as true and have just as much meaning. The line is an inflammatory and intentionally misleading way to describe absolutely nothing, since Ron Paul has neither said nor inferred anything of the kind at any time -- ever.
If he did, it should be a simple matter for you to find and document or link it. Should take you no more than a minute or so to find and post the quote. Breathlessly waiting.........
Are you serious? I have now gained access to your second link, which appears to be some off the wall radical right wing blog site (?). It rather illiterately states that "Paul may not have explicitly accused the U.S. government or Mossad off the 9/11 terrorist attacks on conspiracy-oriented radio shows", and that is as damning as it gets, unless I've missed something. In fact, you or I could substitute the name of almost anyone in the entire world for "Paul", and the statement would be just as true and have just as much meaning. The line is an inflammatory and intentionally misleading way to describe absolutely nothing, since Ron Paul has neither said nor inferred anything of the kind at any time -- ever.
If he did, it should be a simple matter for you to find and document or link it. Should take you no more than a minute or so to find and post the quote. Breathlessly waiting.........
Interesting you should ask because I went online in the first place to find the video of Neil Cavoto's interview w/ Paul where Paul came off like a real kookberger and the only thing I could get was "This link has been removed at Dr. Paul's request..."
Dead people all across the country vote Democrat in every election.
Ron Paul has a few good ideas, but he blows it all to hell with the 9/11 conspiracy crap!
You are grotesquely misinformed. Dr. Paul blames 9-11 on our political meddling in the Middle East. His position is mischaracterized by the mainstream Republicans as "blaming America". You take it to the ultimate level of mischaracterization. Finding causes and blaming are two different things. Dr. Paul knows the difference.
__________________
During times of universal deceit, telling the truth becomes a revolutionary act.
Interesting you should ask because I went online in the first place to find the video of Neil Cavoto's interview w/ Paul where Paul came off like a real kookberger and the only thing I could get was "This link has been removed at Dr. Paul's request..."
If that's all you got, I guess you got nothin'. I'll be happy to give you another shot. With all the neocon nutcakes and rightwing religious freaks out there who consider Dr. Paul the antichrist, this should be easy pickins...
I saw the interview to which you're referring. Cavuto badly embarrassed himself IMHO, which is almost certainly the real reason it was removed.
If that's all you got, I guess you got nothin'. I'll be happy to give you another shot. With all the neocon nutcakes and rightwing religious freaks out there who consider Dr. Paul the antichrist, this should be easy pickins...
I saw the interview to which you're referring. Cavuto badly embarrassed himself IMHO, which is almost certainly the real reason it was removed.
Ya, I'm sure that nut-case Paul was worried about how Neil might look... Duh!
Ya, I'm sure that nut-case Paul was worried about how Neil might look... Duh!
Ron Paul does not work for Fox, thus has no control over its content. Cavuto does, and the video is the copyrighted property of Fox News, who can do with it as they see fit.
"I swear to god, it's like I live in a trailer of common sense, and stare out the window at a tornado of stupidity."
Linear Mode
