FoxNews Caught Editing Wikipedia to Smear Rivals

[ThrillKill]

Originally Posted by Jillian80

Hey, stupid--that smell is your upper lip. You oughta let your wife finish her antibiotics before you head downtown next time.

Has anyone tried to make home brewed beer from bitch yeast?

[deathrattle]

^^^


LOL- Is that your excuse for 'brewer's droop'?

[guage]

Wiki has always been a little fishy.

[mcbear]

Originally Posted by Jayhawk

I think many here miss the point: Anyone can edit anything on that dumbpedia, and everyone seems to take advantage of that option: The DNC, for example, altered the Limbaugh profile... Companies and party aides cast censorious eye over Wikipedia | Technology | The Guardian

I am glad you finally see the light regarding wiki.

It is a great source for POP information only. And then ONLY if there are credible footnotes. They have editors that are suppose to monitor edits and content but they would have to have 1,000 editors and required submitted, vetted changes for it to actually become a legitimate reference resource.

[Bruce R.]

Originally Posted by Jayhawk

I think many here miss the point: Anyone can edit anything on that dumbpedia, and everyone seems to take advantage of that option: The DNC, for example, altered the Limbaugh profile... Companies and party aides cast censorious eye over Wikipedia | Technology | The Guardian

There are many here that don't like the truth, but Jayhawk is right. Both sides edit the hell out of Wiki, and it shows up time and time again.
Mcbear pointed out FOX news, but there are those on the left that have done this as well. It's a shame really.

[mcbear]

Originally Posted by FeelTheLove

Oh my God, Jayhawk, they didn't accuse him of being a dope addict or anything, did they?

No, the DNC change was this:

Originally Posted by DNC Change on Limbaugh Wiki

And somebody from a computer traced to Democrat HQ edited a page on conservative American radio host Rush Limbaugh, calling him "idiotic", "ridiculous" and labelling his 20 million listeners as "legally retarded".

I think there was a problem with the word "legally".

[mcbear]

Originally Posted by Bruce R.

There are many here that don't like the truth, but Jayhawk is right. Both sides edit the hell out of Wiki, and it shows up time and time again.
Mcbear pointed out FOX news, but there are those on the left that have done this as well. It's a shame really.

For the record I also pointed out NYT.

I don't like when anyone does it. I would say it is "just Wiki" and blow it off but too many people use it as a resource and it would be nice if it had academic integrity.

[guage]

Originally Posted by mcbear

No, the DNC change was this:
Quote:
Originally Posted by DNC Change on Limbaugh Wiki
And somebody from a computer traced to Democrat HQ edited a page on conservative American radio host Rush Limbaugh, calling him "idiotic", "ridiculous" and labelling his 20 million listeners as "legally retarded".



I think there was a problem with the word "legally".

Didn't somebody here just post that wording in one of their posts?
I would be shocked, shocked I tell you, if anybody here worked for the DNC.

[Misfit]

Originally Posted by deathrattle

^^^^^^^

Why can't you accept that there is a reason so many BW members think you are a stupid cunt?

Confucious Say

1 man calls you a horses arse - ignore him
2 men call you a horses arse - think about it
3 men call you a horses arse - buy a saddle .........

[Bruce R.]

Originally Posted by Misfit

Confucious Say

1 man calls you a horses arse - ignore him
2 men call you a horses arse - think about it
3 men call you a horses arse - buy a saddle .........

Unless of course all three men are liberals..........
Confucious also say:

Consider the source before you act...............