Iowa Presidential Debate Organizers Snub Ron Paul - Mercedes-Benz Forum

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
post #1 of 15 (permalink) Old 06-21-2007, 10:07 AM Thread Starter
Administratoris Emeritus
 
GeeS's Avatar
 
Date registered: Aug 2002
Vehicle: 2021 SL770
Location: Fountain Hills, AZ
Posts: 44,915
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Quoted: 591 Post(s)
(Thread Starter)
Iowa Presidential Debate Organizers Snub Ron Paul

Written by Mike Green

Few examples of the behind-the-scenes power exerting its authority over the people are more impactful than the deliberate stranglehold on the free speech of candidates running for office. Today, Ron Paul finds himself in the chokehold of a couple of Iowa organizations that have refused to allow his message to be heard on the same stage as other Republican candidates. Ironically, one of the groups claims to be Christian.

As a former campaign manager for a popular candidate running for the California State Assembly in a wealthy district of San Diego County a few years back, I witnessed first-hand the backroom dirty dealing that goes on in the political parties. In my particular experience, the candidate was the front-runner but was eschewed by the Republican Party (the district was historically Republican and so was my candidate) simply and solely on the basis of the fact that he was black.

After weeks of phone calls, meetings and quiet inferences that the Republican Party of San Diego County would support him if he bowed out of the district for which he was running and moved to a southern district near the Mexico border and ran for Congress against a Democrat who was firmly planted there, my candidate accepted the fact that he would not be endorsed by the county Republican Party (although he held office within that same group). It was a conditional offer made by the party to provide support as a sacrifical lamb in a congressional battle if he gracefully exited the race in his home district. He declined. Not once, but several times.

Eventually, a high-ranking member of the Republican National Committee flew down to see us. The "us" was just my candidate and myself. The three of us were in an office conference room in Northern San Diego County when the proposition was made plain. My candidate declined the "offer." In the following weeks the field of candidates for the primaries in our district tripled. When it came time to vote, there were 12 candidates flooding the field in the Republican primary, including a couple of very wealthy latecomers. In the end, we finished 4th.

I left politics after that.

It was quite apparent to me during my short involvement in the behind-the-scenes organization of campaigns for issues and candidates that what the public sees is often contrived, manipulated and sometimes cutthroat. I remember when another well respected Republican candidate, Ambassador Alan Keyes, was taken away from a debate (to which he was initially invited) in handcuffs because he refused to acquiesce to the power that informed him he could not participate.

Today, the organizers in Iowa are preparing for a debate between Republican presidential candidates. This time the odd man out is Ron Paul of Texas. His campaign is quite dismayed at the display of hostile suppression by the folks in Iowa who purport to be Iowans for Tax Relief and the Iowa Christian Alliance. Such strongarm tactics to prevent Paul from addressing issues the other candidates prefer to ignore is not in keeping with the spirit of our constitutional rights to freedom of speech and the democratic process of electing leaders.

The gatekeepers that guard access to the public will do no great service to that public by dismissing a relevant voice in the presidential debate in order to kowtow to the candidates that have ganged up against Paul. While there is no outward proof that the other candidates intend to bow out or have exercised some other clout necessary to close the gate on Paul, the result is clear. Paul has not been invited to a debate his campaign clearly desires to attend.

There is really no mystery here. Since the debate where Paul and Rudy Guiliani briefly broached the topic of 9/11, Paul has been cast in the shadows while the rest of the field has steered clear of the issue of 9/11 and Paul's specific comments. Nevertheless, the American people are interested in the subject even as the national media joins in the effort to suppress the issue from reaching mass audiences during primetime debate coverage.

Unfortunately, much of the American people are quite ignorant, intolerant and impatient, as many in political circles rightly describe the general population. Even a cursory look into the campaigns of numerous candidates reveal methodologies designed to persuade the dumbest among us. Marketing efforts seek to utilize jokes, references to pop culture and an overall appeal to the "Sopranos" fans of America. That isn't to say everyone watching the Sopranos has the IQ equal to their shoe size. But the overall process of politicking and campaigning employs methods that insult the intelligence of many as candidates clamor to pander to the popular culture of the day.

Analyze the totality of the methods of marketing to the masses and you will learn little about the candidates regarding the most important issues facing this nation. They all just want to be liked, or receive the ultimate compliment of being perceived as "cool."

The media is complicit in providing preferred candidates with a pass, choosing to focus on issues that segue into great sound bites by the candidates, rather than do the job of journalists and dig deep to expose the true positions of those seeking to lead this nation.

How is it possible that the future Commander-in-Chief is not grilled relentlessly (as are those appointed by him subject to the approval of Congress) about his or her position on Iraq today, yesterday and as far back as they were holding office? This nation has been at war in Iraq since 1991. The rationale for sending more ground troops in 2003 was the case made by a Commander-in-Chief with the approval of Congress in the aftermath of 9/11. How is it possible that the media is not centered like a laser on the issue of 9/11 and grilling each candidate about his or her evolving positions regarding 9/11 and Iraq? Why is there no focus on the controversies surrounding this administration's reaction to 9/11 and the conspicuously missing Congress members who failed to call for an independent investigation of a scene of mass murder?

There is no greater issue facing this nation than our involvement in the "war on terror" that came as a result of 9/11.

Ron Paul has the courage and integrity to address the issue. He is today alienated by much of the media and his colleagues running concurrent campaigns for the same office. It is no secret that other candidates are unwilling to appear on the same stage as Paul. After all, they are the lying leaders who desire not to have their lies exposed through a thorough scrutiny or debate. No such risk exists in dealing directly with a compliant and complicit media. And no such risk exists when standing on a stage with other puppets.

But Paul is no puppet. And the refusal to invite him to present his point of view to the people of Iowa displays a haughty disrespect for Iowans in general, and those supporters of Paul specifically.

Still, such dictatorial tactics are not the exception in American politics. They are the rule. American politics is filled with propaganda, lies and deception to the degree that the argument that claims every vote counts stands on shaky ground.

Paul's plight is but one tiny example among many that point to a radically changed nation that bears little resemblance to the one designed by the framers of the constitution — whose deliberate restrictions upon an otherwise tyrannical government have been thwarted by the very people to whom they trusted all power. That's you and me, and the rest of the American people.

"If spending money you don't have is the height of stupidity, borrowing money to give it away is the height of insanity." -- anon
GeeS is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #2 of 15 (permalink) Old 06-21-2007, 11:46 AM
BenzWorld Elite
 
old300D's Avatar
 
Date registered: Jul 2003
Vehicle: '83 240D
Location: Denver
Posts: 3,774
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
The Republicans may think they are protecting themselves, but I think it's going to come back to bite them in the ass, hard.

OBK #35

old300D is offline  
post #3 of 15 (permalink) Old 06-21-2007, 11:58 AM Thread Starter
Administratoris Emeritus
 
GeeS's Avatar
 
Date registered: Aug 2002
Vehicle: 2021 SL770
Location: Fountain Hills, AZ
Posts: 44,915
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Quoted: 591 Post(s)
(Thread Starter)
Anything that makes a splash is good for Dr. Paul.

"If spending money you don't have is the height of stupidity, borrowing money to give it away is the height of insanity." -- anon
GeeS is offline  
post #4 of 15 (permalink) Old 06-21-2007, 03:09 PM
BenzWorld Elite
 
Date registered: Sep 2004
Vehicle: 95 E300
Location: Inside my head
Posts: 36,850
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Quoted: 392 Post(s)
I'm shocked, shocked that the Republicans wouldn't want a libertarian anywhere near a microphone.

Shocked.
Botnst is offline  
post #5 of 15 (permalink) Old 06-21-2007, 04:27 PM
BenzWorld Elite
 
Jayhawk's Avatar
 
Date registered: Aug 2005
Vehicle: S500/W220/2000
Location: Lawrence, KS (USA)
Posts: 21,652
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
Totally shocked!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Don't believe everything you think
Jayhawk is offline  
post #6 of 15 (permalink) Old 06-21-2007, 04:45 PM
BenzWorld Elite
 
old300D's Avatar
 
Date registered: Jul 2003
Vehicle: '83 240D
Location: Denver
Posts: 3,774
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Botnst
I'm shocked, shocked that the Republicans wouldn't want a libertarian anywhere near a microphone.

Shocked.
Certainly supports their anti-Constitutional stance of denying rights to people they disagree with. Welcome to 1984.

OBK #35

old300D is offline  
post #7 of 15 (permalink) Old 06-21-2007, 09:16 PM
It Is What It Is, Dude
 
isthisdave's Avatar
 
Date registered: Mar 2006
Vehicle: 1978 107.024 RIP
Location: InTransition
Posts: 21,645
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Quoted: 85 Post(s)
Lifetime Premium Member
If I may, a suggestion for Ron Paul. Transcribe the Iowa Presidential debates, inserting your responses to the various exchanges. Print, post, and otherwise disseminate, by whatever means available.
isthisdave is offline  
post #8 of 15 (permalink) Old 06-21-2007, 09:22 PM Thread Starter
Administratoris Emeritus
 
GeeS's Avatar
 
Date registered: Aug 2002
Vehicle: 2021 SL770
Location: Fountain Hills, AZ
Posts: 44,915
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Quoted: 591 Post(s)
(Thread Starter)
This isn't the big media-sponsored Iowa straw poll debate, in which Dr. Paul is invited to participate, it's more of a minor precursor. Frankly, the more the neocons and religious right try to box him out, the more attention and outrage it's likely to generate.

"If spending money you don't have is the height of stupidity, borrowing money to give it away is the height of insanity." -- anon
GeeS is offline  
post #9 of 15 (permalink) Old 06-21-2007, 09:24 PM
BenzWorld Elite
 
Date registered: Sep 2004
Vehicle: 95 E300
Location: Inside my head
Posts: 36,850
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Quoted: 392 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by GermanStar
This isn't the big media-sponsored Iowa straw poll debate, in which Dr. Paul is invited to participate, it's more of a minor precursor. Frankly, the more the neocons and religious right try to box him out, the more attention and outrage it's likely to generate.
I sure hope that will be the result.
Botnst is offline  
post #10 of 15 (permalink) Old 06-22-2007, 09:11 PM Thread Starter
Administratoris Emeritus
 
GeeS's Avatar
 
Date registered: Aug 2002
Vehicle: 2021 SL770
Location: Fountain Hills, AZ
Posts: 44,915
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Quoted: 591 Post(s)
(Thread Starter)
Iowa Tax Group Shows Its True Colors
By James Newcomb
Published: 2007-06-22

ARTICLE SYNOPSIS:
A little bit of research shows that Iowans for Tax Relief, the organization that has gained notoriety this past week because of its exclusion of Ron Paul in its June 30 presidential forum, is concerned with tax relief for interests other than the average, middle class Iowan worker.

Follow this link to the original source: "Meatheads for Tax Relief"

COMMENTARY:
When Ron Paul's campaign managers announced that their candidate was not invited to a presidential candidates forum hosted by a group called "Iowans for Tax Relief" earlier this week, I'm sure that most people who heard this news scratched their head and wondered, "What kind of tax relief organization would not invite Ron Paul, the champion of low taxes and small government, to its forum?"

It turns out that Iowans for Tax Relief are working to relieve taxes for big businesses, but not middle-class Iowans. Roth & Company reports:

It supports special interest carve-outs and corporate welfare tax subsidies that shrink the tax base and raise the rates on the rest of us. It also refuses to even consider eliminating the deduction for state income taxes in exchange for lower rates.

Iowa is listed as one of the ten worst tax environments for business in the nation. Iowa is also in the top ten of a list the Wall Street Journal calls "Meathead Economics" (named after Hollywood socialism activist Rob Reiner who played the role of "Meathead" in TV's All in the Family.) According to Roth, if it weren't for the actions of Iowans for Tax Relief, Iowa would be considerably better off when it comes to taxation.

Forget that the Executive Vice-President of IFTR is heavily involved in and has personally donated a considerable amount of money to John McCain's campaign. Forget the blacklisting of Ron Paul.

Iowans for Tax Relief simply abhors Paul's message. That is why he wasn't invited. It's not because he's not a credible candidate. (How many "Tommy Thompson Revolution" signs has anyone seen lately?)

In order to more accurately reflect their goals, perhaps they should rename their organization, "Iowans for Special Interest Loopholes and High Rates."

"If spending money you don't have is the height of stupidity, borrowing money to give it away is the height of insanity." -- anon
GeeS is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Reply

  Mercedes-Benz Forum > General Mercedes-Benz Forums > Off-Topic

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now



In order to be able to post messages on the Mercedes-Benz Forum forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.

User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.

Password:


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Email Address:
OR

Log-in











  • Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
     
    Thread Tools
    Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
    Email this Page Email this Page
    Display Modes
    Linear Mode Linear Mode



    Similar Threads
    Topic Author Forum Replies Last Post
    Ron Paul gets buzz FeelTheLove Off-Topic 1 06-16-2007 02:16 PM
    Tucker Carlson interviews Ron Paul GeeS Off-Topic 23 06-15-2007 05:19 PM
    Rudy experiences Ron Paul attack blowback Qubes Off-Topic 29 05-22-2007 08:19 PM
    Rudy McRomney to debate Ron Paul again tonight FeelTheLove Off-Topic 38 05-16-2007 10:13 AM
    Almost time for the first Presidential Debate!! Cap n Carageous Off-Topic 9 09-30-2004 10:50 PM

    Posting Rules  
    You may post new threads
    You may post replies
    You may not post attachments
    You may not edit your posts

    BB code is On
    Smilies are On
    [IMG] code is On
    HTML code is Off
    Trackbacks are On
    Pingbacks are On
    Refbacks are On

     

    Title goes here

    close
    video goes here
    description goes here. Read Full Story
    For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome