Date registered: Sep 2004
Vehicle: 83 Astral Silver 280 SL
Location: Planet Houston
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Quoted: 8 Post(s)
The truth might help.
The right wing constantly bandies about Plame's covert status as if it is somehow some opinion that is under contention. It is not. The job of a Grand Jury is to ascertain fact, not guilt, and they established that for the purposes of this case, Plame's status fit the legal definition and that for the purposes of this and any other prosecution, that would be the statement of fact in this case. Libby's side is able to appeal these finding of fact before the case even begins, yet they did not, even though they have the vast financial resources of the Rightwingoverse at their disposal. Why did they not dispute this? Why is the only place they DO dispute this in the Right Wing Nut Job press? Why do they not simply go to court and do it, if the truth is on their side?
Your so-called lawyer, instead of admitting this legal truth, instead gives us a rehash of Hannityism, falsely stating that this is something that is still being argued about, along with a bunch of other rehash BS. A waste of time.
Recall that earlier generations faced down fascism and communism not just with missiles and tanks, but with sturdy alliances and enduring convictions. They understood that our power alone cannot protect us, nor does it entitle us to do as we please. Instead, they knew that our power grows through its prudent use; our security emanates from the justness of our cause, the force of our example, the tempering qualities of humility and restraint.
-President Barack Obama, 1st Inaugural address
Last edited by FeelTheLove; 02-19-2007 at 11:32 AM.