Dems Take Aim at Oil Company Tax Breaks - Mercedes-Benz Forum

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
post #1 of 35 (permalink) Old 11-19-2006, 07:09 AM Thread Starter
~BANNED~
 
Jakarta Expat's Avatar
 
Date registered: Aug 2006
Vehicle: PM me to Join the Expat Muslims for Obama Club........
Location: Jakarta, Indonesia
Posts: 17,697
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
(Thread Starter)
Dems Take Aim at Oil Company Tax Breaks

Might this be Bush's first veto for 2007

Dems Take Aim at Oil Company Tax Breaks
By H. JOSEF HEBERT
Associated Press Writer
WASHINGTON (AP) -- House Democrats are targeting billions of dollars in oil company tax breaks for quick repeal next year. A broader energy proposal that would boost alternative energy sources and conservation is expected to be put off until later.
Hot-button issues such as a tax on the oil industry's windfall profits or sharp increases in automobile fuel economy probably will not gain much ground given the narrow Democratic majorities in the House and Senate.
Incoming House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, in an outline of priorities over the first 100 hours of the next Congress in January, promises to begin a move toward greater energy independence "by rolling back the multibillion dollar subsidies for Big Oil."
Yet the energy plan being assembled by Pelosi's aides for the initial round of legislation is less ambitious than her pronouncement might suggest.
AP_Tacoda_AMS_DDC_addPair("SECTION", "POLITICS")AP_Tacoda_AMS_DDC("http://te.ap.org/tte/blank.gif", "1.0") For the most part, the tax benefits are ones that lawmakers talked of repealing this year when Congress struggled to respond to the public outcry over soaring summer fuel prices and oil companies' huge profits.
Topping the list for repeal are:
-Tax breaks for refinery expansion and for geological studies to help oil exploration.
-A measure passed two years ago primarily to promote domestic manufacturing. It allows oil companies to take a tax credit if they chose to drill in this country instead of going abroad.
Democrats say neither tax benefit should be needed for an industry reaping large profits at today's high crude oil prices.
Over 10 years, the production tax credit saves oil companies $5 billion and the refinery measure and exploration credit a total of about $1.4 billion, according to Congressional Budget Office estimates.
Other oil tax breaks probably will go unchallenged. That includes some passed by Congress only a year ago and others already targeted for repeal this year.
For example, House Democrats have no plans to change a provision that allows oil companies to avoid billions of dollars in taxes by the way they calculate inventories. The Senate this year agreed to a repeal; the effort was abandoned amid House GOP opposition and an uproar from other industries that also benefit from the tax language.
House Democrats also are shying away from tampering with more than $1 billion worth of oil- and gas-related tax breaks, enacted last year. These breaks largely benefit small companies or gas utilities rather than the major oil companies now awash in cash.
Nevertheless, the House and Senate are expected to push legislation early to force oil companies to renegotiate flawed offshore drilling leases that have allowed the companies to avoid paying federal royalties. The loss eventually could cost the government $10 billion, according to some congressional estimates.
Other prime targets of House and Senate Democrats include:
-Alleged price gouging. Proposals to create a federal price gouging law for gasoline and other fuels probably will move quickly.
-More incentives and mandates to expand the use of ethanol and biodiesel as a substitute for gasoline. Requiring oil companies to phase in retail pumps that deliver fuel that is 85 percent ethanol.
-Requiring power companies to produce a percentage of their electricity from renewable energy sources such as wind and solar power. Such a measure is a priority of Sen. Jeff Bingaman, D-N.M., incoming chairman of the Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee.
-Extending energy efficiency tax credits approved by Congress last year. Most are scheduled to expire at the end of next year.
-Expanding a tax break for buyers of gas-electric hybrid cars and offering more incentives for automakers to build greater numbers of the vehicles.
Rep. John Dingell, D-Mich., who will take over as chairman of the House Energy and Commerce Committee, said he plans hearings on legislation to spur further production and distribution of ethanol and biodiesel, and promote conservation.
But he suggested it will take time to produce legislation. "The process is a long one. It takes hearings, it takes fact finding," said Dingell in a telephone interview.
On the Senate side, Bingaman probably will avoid writing a single broad energy bill, preferring to push through specific legislation. Among Bingaman's other goals are new incentives to spur renewable energy development and more tax breaks for conservation.
Last spring, Sen. Charles Schumer, D-N.Y., said if the country is to reduce its addiction to oil and high energy prices it needs a "crash program" to develop more alternative energy sources, dramatically increase conservation and examine "whether or not we should break up the big oil companies."
Next year, Schumer assumes the No. 3 leadership position among Senate Democrats and will be one of the party's top strategists.

http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories...11-19-03-54-44
Jakarta Expat is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #2 of 35 (permalink) Old 11-19-2006, 08:47 AM
BenzWorld Elite
 
Date registered: Sep 2004
Vehicle: 95 E300
Location: Inside my head
Posts: 36,850
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Quoted: 392 Post(s)
Democrats Have Brilliant Idea:

We need to punish companies who turn a profit. Let's target a tax strictly at them.

For goodness sakes, we sure don't want to reward oil companies for domestic exploration, development of domestic fields, and refining domestic oil.

Instead, lets send our money to countries that despise us.

Burdensome, targeted taxes will encourage oil companies to explore overseas, develop fields overseas, and build refineries overseas. Brilliant idea.

B
Botnst is offline  
post #3 of 35 (permalink) Old 11-19-2006, 08:51 AM Thread Starter
~BANNED~
 
Jakarta Expat's Avatar
 
Date registered: Aug 2006
Vehicle: PM me to Join the Expat Muslims for Obama Club........
Location: Jakarta, Indonesia
Posts: 17,697
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
(Thread Starter)
SO Bush HAS been wrong all these years.
Jakarta Expat is offline  
post #4 of 35 (permalink) Old 11-19-2006, 09:44 AM
Cruise Control
 
Zeitgeist's Avatar
 
Date registered: Sep 2004
Vehicle: '87 300TD/'90 300D/'94 Quattro/'89 Vanagon TDI/'01 EV Weekender VR6
Location: Cascadia
Posts: 51,730
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Quoted: 1427 Post(s)
Lifetime Premium Member
Every once in a blue moon the Dems come up with a good idea; this is one of them. Hooray for good ideas...go get em!
Zeitgeist is offline  
post #5 of 35 (permalink) Old 11-19-2006, 09:59 AM
Moderately subtle
 
edfreeman's Avatar
 
Date registered: Dec 2003
Vehicle: 94 E500, 97 500SL
Location: Soddy Daisy, TN
Posts: 8,519
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Quoted: 80 Post(s)
Lifetime Premium Member
Send a message via AIM to edfreeman
Hmmm . . . I was thinking that expanding refining capabilities would be a very good thing . . . not necessarily more profitable for the oil companies, but something that would reduce the likelyhood that, say, a hurricance in the gulf would cause a reduction in gasoline supply and the acccompanying spike in pricing.
And I thought that the federal, state, and local governments frequently use tax incentives to get companies to do things that are beneficial (ie - anybody not seen a local or state government chuck some tax breaks and promise infrastructure improvements to a company they'd like to locate within their confines?) but not necessarily profit increasing . . .
I guess its a bad thing when you're trying to sensationalize and create an issue for an election . . .
edfreeman is offline  
post #6 of 35 (permalink) Old 11-19-2006, 10:24 AM
Always Remembered RIP
 
cascade's Avatar
 
Date registered: Nov 2006
Vehicle: 1991 560SEC AMG
Location: Grass Valley, N. Calif. / Gardnerville, Nevada
Posts: 10,146
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Quoted: 17 Post(s)
Send a message via AIM to cascade
Quote:
Originally Posted by Botnst
Democrats Have Brilliant Idea:

We need to punish companies who turn a profit. Let's target a tax strictly at them.

For goodness sakes, we sure don't want to reward oil companies for domestic exploration, development of domestic fields, and refining domestic oil.

Instead, lets send our money to countries that despise us.

Burdensome, targeted taxes will encourage oil companies to explore overseas, develop fields overseas, and build refineries overseas. Brilliant idea.

B
Starvation is God's way of punishing those who have no faith in capitalism

~~~~~R. Cobb
cascade is offline  
post #7 of 35 (permalink) Old 11-19-2006, 10:30 AM
Boring Cars...meh!
 
Nutz 4 Benz's Avatar
 
Date registered: Aug 2005
Vehicle: 81 280E, 84 500SEC, 87 560, 89 "300E", 91 500SL, 15 E350 4Matic Estate, 71 BMW 2002, +others
Location: Maui
Posts: 15,980
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Quoted: 17 Post(s)
Lifetime Premium Member
Garage
We're still waiting for Exxon to break bread from the judgement of the Exxon Valdez oil spill. Screw the oil company tax breaks!

http://i30.photobucket.com/albums/c328/nutz4benz/W123/6C3A9CA5-EDFF-4834-8125-34B70B20A676_zpsiyesrawz.jpg
Nutz 4 Benz is offline  
post #8 of 35 (permalink) Old 11-19-2006, 10:44 AM
~BANNED~
 
Date registered: Aug 2002
Posts: 41,649
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Quoted: 1761 Post(s)
This is not a tax against their profitability, it is a tax against their blatant corruption.
Shane is offline  
post #9 of 35 (permalink) Old 11-19-2006, 10:47 AM
BenzWorld Elite
 
yoseyman's Avatar
 
Date registered: Nov 2005
Vehicle: Baby
Location: 1313 Mockingbird lane
Posts: 9,689
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shane
This is not a tax against their profitability, it is a tax against their blatant corruption.
with all due respect; That is the silliest thing Ive heard
yoseyman is offline  
post #10 of 35 (permalink) Old 11-19-2006, 10:56 AM
~BANNED~
 
Date registered: Aug 2002
Posts: 41,649
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Quoted: 1761 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by yoseyman
with all due respect; That is the silliest thing Ive heard
There needs to be some sort of check and balance or those with the money to bribe will always rule.
Shane is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Reply

  Mercedes-Benz Forum > General Mercedes-Benz Forums > Off-Topic

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now



In order to be able to post messages on the Mercedes-Benz Forum forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.

User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.

Password:


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Email Address:
OR

Log-in











  • Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
     
    Thread Tools
    Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
    Email this Page Email this Page
    Display Modes
    Linear Mode Linear Mode



    Similar Threads
    Topic Author Forum Replies Last Post
    Dems take the senate ThrillKill Off-Topic 25 11-09-2006 10:38 PM
    GOP, Democrats Debate Energy Company Tax firstmb Off-Topic 12 11-19-2005 07:24 AM
    Why are dems using race as an issue? MS Fowler Off-Topic 49 11-17-2005 07:36 AM
    Oil Company Executives Defend Profits firstmb Off-Topic 2 11-09-2005 10:55 AM
    AIM name... Dr.ML500 W163 M-Class 6 07-04-2002 11:59 AM

    Posting Rules  
    You may post new threads
    You may post replies
    You may not post attachments
    You may not edit your posts

    BB code is On
    Smilies are On
    [IMG] code is On
    HTML code is Off
    Trackbacks are On
    Pingbacks are On
    Refbacks are On

     

    Title goes here

    close
    video goes here
    description goes here. Read Full Story
    For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome