Wiki'd experiment - Mercedes-Benz Forum

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
post #1 of 12 (permalink) Old 10-27-2006, 10:13 AM Thread Starter
BenzWorld Elite
 
Date registered: Sep 2004
Vehicle: 95 E300
Location: Inside my head
Posts: 36,850
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Quoted: 392 Post(s)
(Thread Starter)
Wiki'd experiment

Can Wikipedia Ever Make the Grade?

As questions about the accuracy of the anyone-can-edit encyclopedia persist, academics are split on whether to ignore it, or start contributing

advertisement

Related materials
List: How to Be a Wikipedian

Text: Grading Wikipedia

Article: Building an Encyclopedia, With or Without Scholars

Article: Co-Founder of Wikipedia, Now a Critic, Starts Spinoff With Academic Editors

Article: Students Flock to an Easy-to-Use Reference, but Professors Warn That It's No Sure Thing

Colloquy: Read the transcript of a live discussion with Alexander Halavais, a communications scholar who tested Wikipedia by deliberately introducing errors, about what the site's rising popularity says about academic authority.

Article tools
By BROCK READ

Alexander M.C. Halavais, an assistant professor of communications at Quinnipiac University, has spent hours and hours wading through Wikipedia, which has become the Internet's hottest information source. Like thousands of his colleagues, he has turned to the open-source encyclopedia for timely information and trivia; unlike most of his peers, he has, from time to time, contributed his own expertise to the site.

But to Wikipedia's legions of ardent amateur editors, Mr. Halavais may be best remembered as a troll.

Two years ago, when he was teaching at the State University of New York at Buffalo, the professor hatched a plan designed to undermine the site's veracity — which, at that time, had gone largely unchallenged by scholars. Adopting the pseudonym "Dr. al-Halawi" and billing himself as a "visiting lecturer in law, Jesus College, Oxford University," Mr. Halavais snuck onto Wikipedia and slipped 13 errors into its various articles. He knew that no one would check his persona's credentials: Anyone can add material to the encyclopedia's entries without having to show any proof of expertise.

Some of the errata he inserted — like a claim that Frederick Douglass, the abolitionist, had made Syracuse, N.Y., his home for four years — seemed entirely credible. Some — like an Oscar for film editing that Mr. Halavais awarded to The Rescuers Down Under, an animated Disney film — were more obviously false, and easier to fact-check. And others were downright odd: In an obscure article on a short-lived political party in New Brunswick, Canada, the professor wrote of a politician felled by "a very public scandal relating to an official Party event at which cocaine and prostitutes were made available."

Mr. Halavais expected some of his fabrications to languish online for some time. Like many academics, he was skeptical about a mob-edited publication that called itself an authoritative encyclopedia. But less than three hours after he posted them, all of his false facts had been deleted, thanks to the vigilance of Wikipedia editors who regularly check a page on the Web site that displays recently updated entries. On Dr. al-Halawi's "user talk" page, one Wikipedian pleaded with him to "refrain from writing nonsense articles and falsifying information."

Mr. Halavais realized that the jig was up.

Writing about the experiment on his blog (http://alex .halavais.net), Mr. Halavais argued that a more determined "troll" — in Web-forum parlance, a poster who contributes only inflammatory or disruptive content — could have done a better job of slipping mistakes into the encyclopedia. But he said he was "impressed" by Wikipedia participants' ability to root out his fabrications. Since then several other high-profile studies have confirmed that the site does a fairly good job at getting its facts straight — particularly in articles on science, an area where Wikipedia excels.

Among academics, however, Wikipedia continues to receive mixed — and often failing — grades. Wikipedia's supporters often portray the site as a brave new world in which scholars can rub elbows with the general public. But doubters of the approach — and in academe, there are many — say Wikipedia devalues the notion of expertise itself.

Those skeptics include Michael Gorman, the immediate past president of the American Library Association. "The problem with an online encyclopedia created by anybody is that you have no idea whether you are reading an established person in the field or someone with an ax to grind," said Mr. Gorman, dean of library services at California State University at Fresno, in an interview with the San Francisco Chronicle.

Perhaps because of the site's refusal to give professors or other experts priority — and because of an editing process that can resemble a free-for-all — a clear preponderance of Wikipedia's contents has been written by people outside academe. In fact, the dearth of scholarly contributions to the site has prompted one prominent former Wikipedian — Larry Sanger, one of the site's co-founders — to start an alternative online encyclopedia, vetted by experts.

But as the encyclopedia's popularity continues to grow, some professors are calling on scholars to contribute articles to Wikipedia, or at least to hone less-than-inspiring entries in the site's vast and growing collection. Those scholars' take is simple: If you can't beat the Wikipedians, join 'em.

Proponents of that strategy showed up in force at Wikimania, the annual meeting for Wikipedia contributors, a three-day event held in August at Harvard University. Leaders of Wikipedia said there that they had turned their attention to increasing the accuracy of information on the Web site, announcing several policies intended to prevent editorial vandalism and to improve or erase Wikipedia's least-trusted entries. "We can no longer feel satisfied and happy when we see these numbers going up," said Jimmy Wales, Wikipedia's other co-founder, referring to the site's ever-expanding base of articles. "We should continue to turn our attention away from growth and towards quality."

Still, not all of Wikipedia's most-active contributors want academics in their club. They argue that an army of hobbyists, teenagers, and even the occasional troll can create a more comprehensive, more useful, and possibly even more accurate resource than can be found in the ivied halls.

"The university needs Wikipedia more than Wikipedia needs the university," said Elijah Meeks at Wikimania. He has studied the site as he pursues a master's degree at the University of California at Merced. The encyclopedia, he contended, will keep on humming — and will improve — whether scholars sign on or not.

More at: http://chronicle.com/temp/reprint.ph...q5ltqcshc5y93y
Botnst is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #2 of 12 (permalink) Old 10-27-2006, 10:20 AM
DP
Moderator
 
DP's Avatar
 
Date registered: Aug 2002
Vehicle: 190E, 400E, SLK350
Location: Chesapeak Bay
Posts: 64,125
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Quoted: 991 Post(s)
Lifetime Premium Member
Bad professor, vely bad
DP is offline  
post #3 of 12 (permalink) Old 10-27-2006, 04:35 PM
BenzWorld Elite
 
Jayhawk's Avatar
 
Date registered: Aug 2005
Vehicle: S500/W220/2000
Location: Lawrence, KS (USA)
Posts: 21,652
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
NO! This is just another liberal experiment.

Don't believe everything you think
Jayhawk is offline  
post #4 of 12 (permalink) Old 10-27-2006, 05:05 PM
BenzWorld Elite
 
redeye's Avatar
 
Date registered: May 2004
Posts: 1,225
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
everything that's happened before and since these times have been liberal experiments
vvvvv
Attached Images
 
redeye is offline  
post #5 of 12 (permalink) Old 10-27-2006, 06:30 PM Thread Starter
BenzWorld Elite
 
Date registered: Sep 2004
Vehicle: 95 E300
Location: Inside my head
Posts: 36,850
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Quoted: 392 Post(s)
(Thread Starter)
Quote:
Originally Posted by redeye
everything that's happened before and since these times have been liberal experiments
vvvvv
Yep, by definition.

If conservatives ruled the planet forever nobody would have ever rubbed two sticks together. Too much innovation. Upset the established order.

B
Botnst is offline  
post #6 of 12 (permalink) Old 10-27-2006, 06:39 PM
DP
Moderator
 
DP's Avatar
 
Date registered: Aug 2002
Vehicle: 190E, 400E, SLK350
Location: Chesapeak Bay
Posts: 64,125
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Quoted: 991 Post(s)
Lifetime Premium Member
Quote:
Originally Posted by Botnst
Yep, by definition.

If conservatives ruled the planet forever nobody would have ever rubbed two sticks together. Too much innovation. Upset the established order.

B
Yep here is a conservative in action

http://www.collegedowntime.com/media/files/gayspank.wmv
DP is offline  
post #7 of 12 (permalink) Old 10-27-2006, 10:36 PM
~BANNED~
 
Date registered: Aug 2002
Posts: 41,649
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Quoted: 1763 Post(s)
Well he turned out normal now didn't he?
Shane is offline  
post #8 of 12 (permalink) Old 10-28-2006, 10:01 AM
BenzWorld Elite
 
Jayhawk's Avatar
 
Date registered: Aug 2005
Vehicle: S500/W220/2000
Location: Lawrence, KS (USA)
Posts: 21,652
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Professor
Yep here is a conservative in action

http://www.collegedowntime.com/media/files/gayspank.wmv
So what's the problem...?

Don't believe everything you think
Jayhawk is offline  
post #9 of 12 (permalink) Old 10-28-2006, 03:18 PM
DP
Moderator
 
DP's Avatar
 
Date registered: Aug 2002
Vehicle: 190E, 400E, SLK350
Location: Chesapeak Bay
Posts: 64,125
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Quoted: 991 Post(s)
Lifetime Premium Member
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jayhawk
So what's the problem...?
Did you watch it to the end or at least the middle or did you loose your concentration after 25 frames? You really need to see somone for your condition Jayhawk. I hear now they have meds that don't stunt growth
DP is offline  
post #10 of 12 (permalink) Old 10-28-2006, 05:13 PM
BenzWorld Elite
 
Jayhawk's Avatar
 
Date registered: Aug 2005
Vehicle: S500/W220/2000
Location: Lawrence, KS (USA)
Posts: 21,652
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Professor
Did you watch it to the end or at least the middle or did you loose your concentration after 25 frames? You really need to see somone for your condition Jayhawk. I hear now they have meds that don't stunt growth
How many "frames" in 10 seconds?

Don't believe everything you think
Jayhawk is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Reply

  Mercedes-Benz Forum > General Mercedes-Benz Forums > Off-Topic

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now



In order to be able to post messages on the Mercedes-Benz Forum forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.

User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.

Password:


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Email Address:
OR

Log-in











  • Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
     
    Thread Tools
    Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
    Email this Page Email this Page
    Display Modes
    Linear Mode Linear Mode



    Similar Threads
    Topic Author Forum Replies Last Post
    "Range" Calc Experiment lennyr R171 SLK-Class 12 02-16-2006 09:00 AM
    Experiment roadsession W163 M-Class 15 08-23-2003 06:29 AM
    Fast Lane/EZ Pass placement experiment and results... Khobalt R170 SLK-Class 13 04-15-2002 12:16 PM

    Posting Rules  
    You may post new threads
    You may post replies
    You may not post attachments
    You may not edit your posts

    BB code is On
    Smilies are On
    [IMG] code is On
    HTML code is Off
    Trackbacks are On
    Pingbacks are On
    Refbacks are On

     

    Title goes here

    close
    video goes here
    description goes here. Read Full Story
    For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome