Originally Posted by mcbear
I was just trying to work through the broken syntax, spelling errors and grammatical illusions you call writing.
First, to get this out of the way, itâ€™s Portuguese, preposterous, and remnants. You do not capitalize the E in â€˜evenâ€™ in the series or put a comma after â€˜indeedâ€™. Further, you would want to put a comma after â€˜decentralizedâ€™.
Now, you need not worry about my speed or ability to keep up with you. You only need to worry about having my complete and undivided attention. Now, about this theory of yours.
Exactly who in the collective of liberals claim that Bush deliberately has avoided killing OBL because his existence justifies Bushâ€™s war on terror? I have never heard, or read a single offering of that theory. It sounds more like a Rush whisper than a real opinion.
Well, first of all, I got a polite PM today from a moderator warning me to go easy on you guys so as not to offend your delicate sensibilities so I'll try to keep that in mind as I compose my response.
So about 3/4 of your retort above is dedicated to criticizing my spelling, punctuation and grammar. As I pointed out to Shane, once before, this tactic is typically the last refuge of the scoundrel who has lost the argument and is grasping.....at.....straws. (Note to moderators: I am not saying that mbear is
a scoundrel, only that he might be
a scoundrel. I hope that this qualification meets with BW's new standards of courtesy). On the other hand I have discovered that a 3 to 1 ratio of nonsense to substance is about par for the course for you so, in that respect, you did not disappoint.
Now with regards to the sole substantive point you made in the above post, namely that you question my assertion that some liberals maintain"...that Bush deliberately has avoided killing OBL because his existence justifies Bushâ€™s war on terror? I have never heard, or read a single offering of that theory
" I submit the following as evidence (exhibit #1):
Originally Posted by FeelTheLove
I think it's pretty obvious now that Bush intentionally let Osama go, most likely on Rove's advice that a permanent bogeyman along the line of "Goldstein" in Orwell's "1984" would be politically useful. .....
This from a the following post (exhibit #2):
So, once again, you have demonstrated a great ability in finding spelling and puctuation errors but still appear to lag behind in your reading and comprehension skills.