Originally Posted by JimSmith
That is your concept or interpretation of my "concept" on the matter. Self defense is not ruled out, in fact, on 9-12 we should have nuked that asshole Osamma and his supporters the Taliban in Afghanistan.
I am simply taking what you write and then carrying it to its logical (or illogical0 conclusion.
So, after 9/11 you would have used nukes on Osama. Again, interesting concept.
Where exactly would you have aimed those nukes at?
Afghanistan? How about all the people who DID NOT support or even care for the Taliban?
A well-aimed missile perhaps? Like the ones that bill clinton supposedly aimed at OBL which resulted in the death of a few innocent camels?
I am just curious to find out what you conisder to be a justifiable use of a nuke?
Under what circumstance would we be justified in nuking a country?
How much nuking and what targets are OK.
Under what circumstances would we not be justified in nuking a nation?
Which targets are not OK?
I just want to see to what extreme you are ready to carry your position.
A man should not be afraid tohave is logic and philosophy tested.
You keeping putting this stuff out there. I just want to see where you are going with all of this.
The ball, as they say, is now in your court.