What do you think about the attacks of 9/11? - Page 17 - Mercedes-Benz Forum

View Poll Results: What do you think about the attacks of 9/11?
The administration was caught unaware 12 27.91%
The administration had info, but failed to "connect the dots" 17 39.53%
The administration knew specifics, but failed to prevent in time 2 4.65%
The administration knew, but allowed it to happen anyway 1 2.33%
The administration knew of the attacks and acted to enable them 11 25.58%
Voters: 43. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
post #161 of 164 (permalink) Old 02-27-2006, 04:57 PM Thread Starter
BenzWorld Elite
 
old300D's Avatar
 
Date registered: Jul 2003
Vehicle: '83 240D
Location: Denver
Posts: 3,774
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
(Thread Starter)
RE: What do you think about the attacks of 9/11?

Quote:
Botnst - 2/22/2006 6:50 PM

Quote:
old300D - 2/22/2006 8:42 PM

Quote:
That Guy - 2/22/2006 4:21 PM

Excellent Popular Mechanics article on this topic.
http://www.popularmechanics.com/science/defense/1227842.html?page=6&c=y

I apologize if this is a repost.
It's not reposted in this thread, and I've not seen it. I agree with you about "eyewitness" testimony, in fact many only claim it was a commercial airliner after the official story tied flight 77 to the Pentagon crash.

I'm afraid that link doesn't answer many questions. If one wing was sheared when it hit the ground, according to many "eyewitnesses", where is the resulting damage from that? I also don't buy the "liquid" thing squeezing the plane into the small hole. I'm also not convinced about a landing gear causing the punch through in wing C. Many assertions made, but nothing in print that convinces. And what's with this photo?



This is supposed to be proof of wreckage? It's a freakin' piece of a cowling. So what? And it's the only photo that shows anything.

And nothing explains the manuvers a rookie pilot hijacker did with a 757 from 7000 feet, or why nothing was done about this plane, when it was all alone in the air for 30 minutes after it was known planes had already hit the towers. Where are the fighters? Where is the building defense? Why the difficult flight approach in the newly remodeled, thinly populated side of the building that this plane should not have been able to do?

Just questions.
Okay, in the first part you discount witnesses and the second part you rely on them. Either the witnesses are reliable or they are not. Unless you have evidence to support discounting some witnesses and favoring others, you are biasing the analysis by selective use of data.

Your mind is made.

Bot
You are mistaken, my mind is not "made". I am, however, questioning the official story, which is riddled with holes. It looks to me like most other's minds are "made", and I understand that. The alternative is horrifying.

OBK #35

old300D is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #162 of 164 (permalink) Old 02-27-2006, 06:54 PM
BenzWorld Elite
 
Date registered: Sep 2004
Vehicle: 95 E300
Location: Inside my head
Posts: 36,850
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Quoted: 392 Post(s)
RE: What do you think about the attacks of 9/11?

Quote:
old300D - 2/27/2006 6:57 PM

Quote:
Botnst - 2/22/2006 6:50 PM

Quote:
old300D - 2/22/2006 8:42 PM

Quote:
That Guy - 2/22/2006 4:21 PM

Excellent Popular Mechanics article on this topic.
http://www.popularmechanics.com/science/defense/1227842.html?page=6&c=y

I apologize if this is a repost.
It's not reposted in this thread, and I've not seen it. I agree with you about "eyewitness" testimony, in fact many only claim it was a commercial airliner after the official story tied flight 77 to the Pentagon crash.

I'm afraid that link doesn't answer many questions. If one wing was sheared when it hit the ground, according to many "eyewitnesses", where is the resulting damage from that? I also don't buy the "liquid" thing squeezing the plane into the small hole. I'm also not convinced about a landing gear causing the punch through in wing C. Many assertions made, but nothing in print that convinces. And what's with this photo?



This is supposed to be proof of wreckage? It's a freakin' piece of a cowling. So what? And it's the only photo that shows anything.

And nothing explains the manuvers a rookie pilot hijacker did with a 757 from 7000 feet, or why nothing was done about this plane, when it was all alone in the air for 30 minutes after it was known planes had already hit the towers. Where are the fighters? Where is the building defense? Why the difficult flight approach in the newly remodeled, thinly populated side of the building that this plane should not have been able to do?

Just questions.
Okay, in the first part you discount witnesses and the second part you rely on them. Either the witnesses are reliable or they are not. Unless you have evidence to support discounting some witnesses and favoring others, you are biasing the analysis by selective use of data.

Your mind is made.

Bot
You are mistaken, my mind is not "made". I am, however, questioning the official story, which is riddled with holes. It looks to me like most other's minds are "made", and I understand that. The alternative is horrifying.
Which holes, like the one where you claimed there was no debris?

etc
Botnst is offline  
post #163 of 164 (permalink) Old 02-27-2006, 06:57 PM
BenzWorld Elite
 
Date registered: Sep 2004
Vehicle: 95 E300
Location: Inside my head
Posts: 36,850
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Quoted: 392 Post(s)
RE: What do you think about the attacks of 9/11?

Oh, I'm still waiting for you to offer a cohesive theory that will explain the whole damned thing. All you have done so far is provided links to Nostradamus' and Elvis' Conspiracy Emporium. Let's here your explanation.

Bot
Botnst is offline  
post #164 of 164 (permalink) Old 02-27-2006, 09:34 PM
BenzWorld Elite
 
mzsmbs's Avatar
 
Date registered: Sep 2004
Vehicle: 1972 Mercedes 250 (/8) W114/M130
Location: on a high bank of a creek
Posts: 7,296
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
RE: What do you think about the attacks of 9/11?

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-5137581991288263801



in political asylum
mzsmbs is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Reply

  Mercedes-Benz Forum > General Mercedes-Benz Forums > Off-Topic

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now



In order to be able to post messages on the Mercedes-Benz Forum forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.

User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.

Password:


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Email Address:
OR

Log-in











  • Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
     
    Thread Tools
    Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
    Email this Page Email this Page
    Display Modes
    Linear Mode Linear Mode



    Posting Rules  
    You may post new threads
    You may post replies
    You may not post attachments
    You may not edit your posts

    BB code is On
    Smilies are On
    [IMG] code is On
    HTML code is Off
    Trackbacks are On
    Pingbacks are On
    Refbacks are On

     

    Title goes here

    close
    video goes here
    description goes here. Read Full Story
    For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome