The ones who kidnap civilians and butcher them on camera for political gain. The ones who target women and children for death/injury with suicide jacketed murderous automatons. The ones who've murdered the defense attys for Saddam. etc.
The ones who kidnap civilians and butcher them on camera for political gain. The ones who target women and children for death/injury with suicide jacketed murderous automatons. The ones who've murdered the defense attys for Saddam. etc.
LOL... so the ones who do it off-camera are the good guys.
So far about 100,000 innocent civilians killed by the invaders, I mean good guys...
The ones who kidnap civilians and butcher them on camera for political gain. The ones who target women and children for death/injury with suicide jacketed murderous automatons. The ones who've murdered the defense attys for Saddam. etc.
LOL... so the ones who do it off-camera are the good guys.
So far about 100,000 innocent civilians killed by the invaders, I mean good guys...
Who are these terrorists that you claim are beheading civilians off-camera. Who are the terrorists on the "good side" whom you claim are targeting civilians for death/injury? Which of the "good guys" has murdered Saddam's defense attys.?
These 100,000 lives are important to you? How many would be alive if the terrorists would pull out and let the new democratically elected govt. proceed?
I'll make it simple for you. My country is currently led by a bunch of evil, lying criminals. But if someone from the far side of the globe staged an invasion to replace my leaders with a new regime, I'd resist them with everything I had.
I'll make it simple for you. My country is currently led by a bunch of evil, lying criminals. But if someone from the far side of the globe staged an invasion to replace my leaders with a new regime, I'd resist them with everything I had.
And you'd call me a "terrorist".
I suppose that would depend on if you targeted civilians for death or if you targeted the invading military.
Vehicle: 2008 CLK63 Black Series, 2008 Cayenne GTS
Location: Fargo, ND
Posts: 480
RE: No "insurgents" to be found in Bush speech
Quote:
BENZ REB - 12/8/2005 11:28 PM
Quote:
chiphomme - 12/8/2005 9:49 PM
"murderous terrorist scum" works for me.
Definitely. People who try and defend their country against invaders from overseas should always be called "murderous terrorist scum".
You win the moronic moral equivalence award.
"People who try and defend their country"? LOL!!!
I hope you know these "people" are mainly Baathist thugs and al Qaeda nut jobs that have virtually no popular support.
Vehicle: 2008 CLK63 Black Series, 2008 Cayenne GTS
Location: Fargo, ND
Posts: 480
RE: No "insurgents" to be found in Bush speech
Quote:
BENZ REB - 12/9/2005 12:27 AM
I'll make it simple for you. My country is currently led by a bunch of evil, lying criminals. But if someone from the far side of the globe staged an invasion to replace my leaders with a new regime, I'd resist them with everything I had.
chiphomme - 12/9/2005 1:02 AM
You win the moronic moral equivalence award.
Oh thanks, I had been hoping for that.
However, we could only claim "moral equivalence" if Iraq had invaded our country without provocation, established an occupation, murdered 100,000 civilians, deposed our rulers, replaced our system of governement, etc etc.
Vehicle: 2008 CLK63 Black Series, 2008 Cayenne GTS
Location: Fargo, ND
Posts: 480
RE: No "insurgents" to be found in Bush speech
Quote:
BENZ REB - 12/9/2005 1:05 AM
Quote:
chiphomme - 12/9/2005 1:02 AM
You win the moronic moral equivalence award.
Oh thanks, I had been hoping for that.
However, we could only claim "moral equivalence" if Iraq had invaded our country without provocation, established an occupation, murdered 100,000 civilians, deposed our rulers, replaced our system of governement, etc etc.
So sorry, no equivalence. Not remotely close.
"Without provaction"?
Has your head been buried in the sand for 20 years?
-The Baathist regime was in multiple violations of several chapter 7 UN resolutions.
-A low scale war with two no fly zones were required to protect 2/3s of the Iraqi population from 1991-2003
-Economic sanctions were being applied for that entire time period.
-Saddam Hussein gave refuge and money to terrorists.
In fact in the late 90's he said he'd help Bin Laden.
-Saddam baathists tried to assassinate a former US President
-The Baathists invaded two countries and threatened several others.
-Saddam's regime practiced genocide
-Numerous mass Graves have been dug up (hundreds of thousands of bodies are supposedly in them)
etc
If you think Saddam was no threat you're truly ignorant.
BTW, the Lancet has been heavily questioned and it never said the US "murdered" anyone.
Linear Mode
