tcp_ML500 - 11/30/2005 1:43 PM
GermanStar - 11/30/2005 12:51 PM
You see, this is what I mean. I don't actually understand anything you said in the last five posts. More to the point, I don't understand their relevance to the posts you seemed to be responding to.
Rollerblade stink weasel (there, I can do it, too).
OK! You've known me for a little while, you know I can resist making lude comments. That should give you context for my first post.
I did not check the link you posted, but from your "Larry Christmas", my cinematic mind floated to dirty Larry Christmas, my dirty mind floated to dirty christmas.
Trees, garlands and balls being essential to Christmas, I thought bout twisting the concept for a dirty christmas, that explains my first post, responding with a dirty pic of my genitals covered in garlands, topped with an angel that moved up and down on request. The tree figuratively begin my penis, while my testicles can be see as ornaments, balls. This should be repulsive to the prude, and funny for a minority (of which I am part) of others.
After that post, everything flows logically, deeped in the gutter.
You replied that boxers would be in order
I twisted your word as I see that boxers would be below my tree line to exhibit my aforementioned and ornate tree. Boxers are under the tree, so are boxes, containing the Christmas gifts.
I asked if the boxes should cover the tree because I understood you wanted my boxers to cover my genitalia.
I then twisted your response a little bit more in the same direction. Figuring that you were (are!) confident in your masculinity, telling me that I should hide my parts could signify that you assumed that my parts are hideous compared to yours.
Hence the "You just think your tree is better and bigger than mine." Could be construed as you are so rich you have boxes (gifts) and boxers higher up your tree, show off!
Remembering your profession, I used parts to describe genitalia, as well as car parts. You do charge for the parts you sell? Which, in the other way, can be construed as an older profession. My belief in shareware denotes my interest in free love.
You talked about your shareware experience, and I used your use of the past tense to imply that you no longer provide services for free, I asked for confirmation, one part you probably sell is a cylinder head? So I pushed, by asking if you would no longer give a head, allowing my salacious mind to explore your sexuality on a tangent.
You answered that you did not provide services for free by an unequivocal "no", and then threatened me of confiscating my tree.
So I decided to prove you wrong, in other words, you are still providing services for free, this treat I described as giving me the shaft, a punishment, but also a part you should not give for free for fear of going bankrupt. For a moment, I fantazised about you giving me your shaft, since you thought your tree was better than mine, I might have something to gain after all.
At this point, I see blank stares from everyone. f my ambition is to make at least one person laugh, can I be counted as that person?