Civil War brewing in Republican Party between Frist and McCain? - Page 7 - Mercedes-Benz Forum

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
post #61 of 66 (permalink) Old 06-05-2005, 08:15 AM
BenzWorld Elite
 
Date registered: Sep 2004
Vehicle: 95 E300
Location: Inside my head
Posts: 36,850
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Quoted: 392 Post(s)
RE: Civil War brewing in Republican Party between Frist and McCain?

This could also be posted on another thread, but I think it fits both equally.

Bot

SEVEN 'EXTRAORDINARY' IDIOTS
June 1, 2005

Let's not put the seven Republican senators who engineered the "compromise" deal with the Democrats in charge of negotiations with North Korea. I would sooner trust the North Koreans to keep their word than the Democrats.

The North Koreans at least waited for the ink to dry on Clinton's 1996 "peace" deal before they set to work violating it by feverishly building nuclear weapons. After hoodwinking seven Republicans into a "compromise" deal, Senate Democrats waited exactly seven seconds before breaking it.

The deal was this: Senate Republicans would not use their majority status to win confirmation votes. In return, the Democrats promised to stop blocking nominees supported by a majority of senators — except in "extraordinary circumstances." Thus, a minority of senators in the party Americans keep trying to throw out of power will now be choosing federal judges with the advice and consent of the president.

The seven Republicans we're not leaving in charge of the national treasury believed they could trust the Democrats to interpret "extraordinary circumstances" fairly. And why not? It's not as if the Democrats have behaved outrageously for the past four years using their minority status to block Bush's nominees. Oh wait — no, I have that wrong. The Democrats have behaved outrageously for the past four years using their minority status to block Bush's nominees.

Hmmm. Well, at least the Democrats didn't wait until Trent Lott foolishly granted them an equal number of committee chairmanships following the 2000 election to seize illegitimate control of the Senate by getting future Trivial Pursuit answer Jim Jeffords to change parties after being elected as a Republican. Oops, no — they did that, too.

The seven Republican "mavericks," as The New York Times is wont to call them, had just signed off on this brilliant compromise when the Democrats turned around and filibustered John Bolton, Bush's nominee to be ambassador to the United Nations.

At least it wasn't an important job. But even so, didn't we win the last election? Why, yes, we did! And didn't we win a majority in the Senate? Yes, we did! To be precise, Republicans have won a majority of Senate seats the past six consecutive elections. (And the last six consecutive elections in the House of Representatives, too!)

I think that means Republicans should win. Republican senators support Bush's nominees and Democratic senators oppose them. The way disagreements like this are ordinarily sorted out in a democracy is that a vote is taken among our elected representatives, and majority vote wins.

But sometime after 1993 — which, by eerie coincidence, was the last time Democrats had a majority in the Senate — a new rule developed, requiring that the minority party win all contested votes. The Democrats — the same people the seven mavericks are relying on to play fair now — began using procedural roadblocks to prevent the majority vote from prevailing by simply preventing votes from taking place at all. Senate Democrats do this by voting not to vote, whereas Texas Democrats do it by boarding a Greyhound bus bound for Oklahoma.

Democrats tried "Count All the Votes (Until I Win)" — Al Gore, 2000. They tried "Vote or Die!" — P. Diddy, 2004. Those failed, so now the Democrats' motto is: "No Voting!"

The Senate majority leader, Bill Frist, thought the party with the most votes should be able to win. (Boy — talk about out of touch! And this guy wants to be president?)

The seven "maverick" Republicans thought a better idea would be to crawl to the minority party and plead for crumbs. If the "maverick" Republicans had a slogan, it would be: "Always surrender from a position of strength."

The deal they struck, this masterful Peace of Westphalia, simply put into writing the rule that the minority party controls the Senate — which will remain the rule until the Democrats aren't the minority party anymore.

No wonder Democrats were so testy about bringing democracy to Iraq: They can't bear democracy in America. Liberals' beef with Iraq's new government was that the Sunnis — the minority sect whose reign of terror controlled Iraq for almost 30 years — wouldn't be adequately represented. Obviously, this did not bode well for the Democrats — a minority party whose reign of terror controlled the U.S. House for over 40 years.

The only way for Americans to get some vague semblance of what they voted for is to elect mammoth Republican majorities — and no "mavericks." (Fortunately, for the sake of civilization and the republic, that process seems to be well under way.)

Chuck Schumer could be the last Democrat in the Senate and the new rule would be: Unanimous votes required for all Senate business. But at least we could count on Senators Lindsey Graham, Mike DeWine, John McCain, John Warner, Olympia Snowe, Susan Collins and Lincoln Chafee to strike a deal forcing Schumer to agree not to block the 99 other senators except in "extraordinary circumstances."

COPYRIGHT 2005 ANN COULTER

DISTRIBUTED BY UNIVERSAL PRESS SYNDICATE

Botnst is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #62 of 66 (permalink) Old 06-05-2005, 12:28 PM
BenzWorld Elite
 
old300D's Avatar
 
Date registered: Jul 2003
Vehicle: '83 240D
Location: Denver
Posts: 3,774
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
RE: Civil War brewing in Republican Party between Frist and McCain?

Man, Coulter is just f'n crazy. Or self-deluded, who knows???

OBK #35

old300D is offline  
post #63 of 66 (permalink) Old 06-05-2005, 10:47 PM
Administratoris Emeritus
 
GeeS's Avatar
 
Date registered: Aug 2002
Vehicle: 2021 SL770
Location: Fountain Hills, AZ
Posts: 44,915
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Quoted: 591 Post(s)
RE: Civil War brewing in Republican Party between Frist and McCain?

Right up there with quoting Alfred E. Newman... Amazing to me that anyone even cares what she has to say.

"If spending money you don't have is the height of stupidity, borrowing money to give it away is the height of insanity." -- anon
GeeS is offline  
post #64 of 66 (permalink) Old 06-06-2005, 06:20 AM
BenzWorld Elite
 
Date registered: Sep 2004
Vehicle: 2014 E250 Bluetec 4-Matic, 1983 240D 4-Speed
Location: USA
Posts: 9,257
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Quoted: 256 Post(s)
RE: Civil War brewing in Republican Party between Frist and McCain?

But it does point out how the Republican Party expects all Republicans to vote on all issues as though they were the Borg. Jim
JimSmith is offline  
post #65 of 66 (permalink) Old 06-06-2005, 04:53 PM
BenzWorld Elite
 
Date registered: Sep 2004
Vehicle: 95 E300
Location: Inside my head
Posts: 36,850
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Quoted: 392 Post(s)
RE: Civil War brewing in Republican Party between Frist and McCain?

Posting Coulterisms on here is like running a stick along zoo cages. Grrrrrr. Bark-bark, howl, hissssssssss!!!! I look forward with great anticipation to her next delicately composed missive.

BTW, I really do enjoy her writing style. She often stretches a point too far in order to take a shot or for a clever turn of phrase. Reminds me somewhat of my homeboy, James Carville. I have always enjoyed Carville's style and for him, like my darlin' Ms Coulter, accuracy is secondary to a well-told story.
Botnst is offline  
post #66 of 66 (permalink) Old 06-07-2005, 12:44 AM
BenzWorld Elite
 
old300D's Avatar
 
Date registered: Jul 2003
Vehicle: '83 240D
Location: Denver
Posts: 3,774
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
RE: Civil War brewing in Republican Party between Frist and McCain?

Quote:
Botnst - 6/6/2005 4:53 PM

Posting Coulterisms on here is like running a stick along zoo cages. Grrrrrr. Bark-bark, howl, hissssssssss!!!! I look forward with great anticipation to her next delicately composed missive.

BTW, I really do enjoy her writing style. She often stretches a point too far in order to take a shot or for a clever turn of phrase. Reminds me somewhat of my homeboy, James Carville. I have always enjoyed Carville's style and for him, like my darlin' Ms Coulter, accuracy is secondary to a well-told story.
Well, I'll give you that one, Carville is a good one to put in opposition to that foaming bitch.

OBK #35

old300D is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Reply

  Mercedes-Benz Forum > General Mercedes-Benz Forums > Off-Topic

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now



In order to be able to post messages on the Mercedes-Benz Forum forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.

User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.

Password:


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Email Address:
OR

Log-in











  • Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
     
    Thread Tools
    Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
    Email this Page Email this Page
    Display Modes
    Linear Mode Linear Mode



    Posting Rules  
    You may post new threads
    You may post replies
    You may not post attachments
    You may not edit your posts

    BB code is On
    Smilies are On
    [IMG] code is On
    HTML code is Off
    Trackbacks are On
    Pingbacks are On
    Refbacks are On

     

    Title goes here

    close
    video goes here
    description goes here. Read Full Story
    For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome