KBR spent $27.5 million getting $82,100 worth of LPG into Iraq - Mercedes-Benz Forum

 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
post #1 of 5 (permalink) Old 03-20-2005, 07:25 PM Thread Starter
Administratoris Emeritus
 
GeeS's Avatar
 
Date registered: Aug 2002
Vehicle: 2021 SL770
Location: Fountain Hills, AZ
Posts: 44,915
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Quoted: 591 Post(s)
(Thread Starter)
KBR spent $27.5 million getting $82,100 worth of LPG into Iraq

WASHINGTON - Iraq needed fuel. Halliburton Co. was ordered to get it there — quick. So the Houston-based contractor charged the Pentagon $27.5 million to ship $82,100 worth of cooking and heating fuel.

In the latest revelation about the company's oft-criticized performance in Iraq, a Pentagon audit report disclosed Monday showed Halliburton subsidiary KBR spent $82,100 to buy liquefied petroleum gas, better-known as LPG, in Kuwait and then 335 times that number to transport the fuel into violence-ridden Iraq.

Pentagon auditors combing through the company's books were mystified by this charge.

"It is illogical that it would cost $27,514,833 to deliver $82,100 in LPG fuel," officials from the Defense Contract Audit Agency noted in the report.

The portions of the audit report released Monday did not specify exactly how much fuel was involved in this billing.

The portions of audit report were released by Rep. Henry Waxman, D-Calif., and Rep. John Dingell, D-Mich., both dogged critics of Halliburton and its wartime contracts.

Halliburton spokeswoman Wendy Hall said the figures were taken out of context.

"The implication is definitely misleading," Hall said. "Transporting fuel into Iraq was a mission fraught with danger, which increased the prices that firms were willing to offer for transportation."

Halliburton has seen 61 of its workers and subcontractors die in Iraq and Kuwait, many while delivering fuel.

Army officials were desperate to get fuel into Iraq, fearing the lack of such basic necessities as cooking and heating fuel would lead to greater unrest and support for the insurgency.

But efforts to truck in fuel were hampered by repeated attacks on fuel convoys, delays organizing military escorts, supply route closures and changing delivery points, company officials said. Security was so dicey, in fact, that tanker trucks were lucky to make two round trips per month.

And because neighboring Kuwait had few trucks available to transport fuel, Halliburton had to bring in trucks from neighboring countries and contract for a barge, Hall said.

Company officials say they transported about 3.5 million barrels of LPG from Kuwait to Iraq via truck and barge.

The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, which had assigned Halliburton the job of getting fuel into Iraq, declined to comment on the substance of the audit report, noting that it contained confidential commercial information that had not been authorized for release outside government channels.

Corps officials said a subsequent audit report was completed in February, which they are now studying.

"The major issues in this audit report have not been resolved," a Pentagon spokesperson said. The corps "is currently working to finalize negotiations for a price on this and all outstanding task orders."

The lawmakers would not say how they had obtained the audit report for the fuel transportation.

Company officials point out the firm's estimating and purchasing systems have recently received a nod of approval from the Pentagon's Defense Contract Management Agency.

In all, Halliburton submitted bills to the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers totaling $875 million for supplying Iraq with fuel from May 2003 through March 2004.

Pentagon auditors questioned $108 million or about 12 percent of those costs.

That's substantially higher than the $61 million in possible fuel overcharges Pentagon auditors had previously identified. But that figure only covered the first five months of Halliburton's fuel supply assignment.

In March 2004, the Defense Energy Support Center, the military's own fuel supply arm, took over the job.

In a letter to President Bush Monday, Waxman and Dingell complained that Pentagon officials had repeatedly ignored their requests to see copies of the Pentagon audits.

"Indeed, when Government Reform Committee staff indicated that they were considering issuing a subpoena for the audit reports, a Defense Department official replied that issuing a subpoena will not get the material released any faster," the lawmakers wrote.

"If spending money you don't have is the height of stupidity, borrowing money to give it away is the height of insanity." -- anon
GeeS is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #2 of 5 (permalink) Old 03-20-2005, 09:30 PM
Cruise Control
 
Zeitgeist's Avatar
 
Date registered: Sep 2004
Vehicle: '87 300TD/'90 300D/'94 Quattro/'89 Vanagon TDI/'01 EV Weekender VR6
Location: Cascadia
Posts: 51,730
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Quoted: 1426 Post(s)
Lifetime Premium Member
RE: KBR spent $27.5 million getting $82,100 worth of LPG into Iraq

I'll tell you quite frankly, as a government contractor, contracting should be used sparingly or not at all. In many cases, the hit to taxpayers is vastly more than if the gum'nt just did the job in the first place. Iraq has proven to be a goldmine of limitless profit for firms that act like parasites on the guv's leaky teat. KBR should be banned from guv contracts for 5 years for their gross incompetence, contract padding and skimming
Zeitgeist is offline  
post #3 of 5 (permalink) Old 03-21-2005, 08:24 AM
BenzWorld Veteran
 
Date registered: Sep 2004
Vehicle: 1980 280e
Posts: 670
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
RE: KBR spent $27.5 million getting $82,100 worth of LPG into Iraq

I was a contractor on the NMCI project a year ago, doing the same job at a regular company paid exactly the same but I got just under the $79,000 limit so I didn't have to pay any taxes because I was working over seas (Not Iraq) so it worked out to quite abit more than a regular job, but all I'm saying is that not all contractors are out to steal money from the government, other contractors in doing the same job in the states had to pay taxes, I just got lucky so to speak to work in another country.
Anyway, not all contractors are out to rip the government off and after seeing these video's they may have a point about it being dangerous to transport stuff in Iraq....

(THIS SITE IS NSFW)

http://www.ogrish.com/archives/islamic_army_attacks_vehicle_with_ied_device_Mar_2 1_2005.html

http://www.ogrish.com/archives/islamic_army_in_iraq_attacks_us_vehicle_with_roads ide_bomb_Mar_20_2005.html

http://www.ogrish.com/archives/british_vehicle_attacked_by_an_improvised_explosiv e_device_Mar_18_2005.html
ilikemercedes is offline  
post #4 of 5 (permalink) Old 03-21-2005, 06:43 PM
Cruise Control
 
Zeitgeist's Avatar
 
Date registered: Sep 2004
Vehicle: '87 300TD/'90 300D/'94 Quattro/'89 Vanagon TDI/'01 EV Weekender VR6
Location: Cascadia
Posts: 51,730
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Quoted: 1426 Post(s)
Lifetime Premium Member
RE: KBR spent $27.5 million getting $82,100 worth of LPG into Iraq

I didn't click on the links, but I assume they show all sorts of mayhem and violence...not unlike the battle situations soldiers find themselves in when sent off to military conflicts. In the past, the tasks currently assigned to private for profit mercenaries were fulfilled by armed forces personnel...why are the taxpayers coughing up the bill for massive no-bid cost-plus contracts to do jobs previously carried out by our very own military troops?
Zeitgeist is offline  
post #5 of 5 (permalink) Old 03-21-2005, 06:56 PM
BenzWorld Member
 
Date registered: Jan 2005
Posts: 350
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
RE: KBR spent $27.5 million getting $82,100 worth of LPG into Iraq

Posted by Zeitgeist: why are the taxpayers coughing up the bill for massive no-bid cost-plus contracts to do jobs previously carried out by our very own military troops?

-----------------------------------------------------

I think this is what Bush means by the "ownership society." American kids go over to Iraq, get killed, and Halliburton gets to own lots of our treasure.

Joe B.
Joe Bauers is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Reply

  Mercedes-Benz Forum > General Mercedes-Benz Forums > Off-Topic

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now



In order to be able to post messages on the Mercedes-Benz Forum forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.

User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.

Password:


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Email Address:
OR

Log-in











  • Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
     
    Thread Tools
    Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
    Email this Page Email this Page
    Display Modes
    Linear Mode Linear Mode



    Posting Rules  
    You may post new threads
    You may post replies
    You may not post attachments
    You may not edit your posts

    BB code is On
    Smilies are On
    [IMG] code is On
    HTML code is Off
    Trackbacks are On
    Pingbacks are On
    Refbacks are On

     

    Title goes here

    close
    video goes here
    description goes here. Read Full Story
    For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome