Q1. Why are you always the first to make personal attacks?
cub07 - 6/10/2004 6:11 PM
You are very much the same as this person, having a strong opinion of wrong doing, with nothing to offer.
tcp_ML500 - 6/10/2004 7:11 PM
1. Diplomas you get on the net don't count!
A1. I've studied particles regressing in time, but at this level, I still measure 7:11 PM (CST) to be one hour after
6:11 PM (CST). Don't you?
S2. POINTING OUT SOMETHING AS STUPID AS THIS MAKES YOU LOOK PETTY.
R2. Looks are deceiving, aren't they? Don't fault me for your failure to seek understanding and appreciation beyond looks. Not that I am a poster child of Internet Etiquette, but there is such a thing, and if you find shouting acceptable and necessary to making a point, I'd think that you support delivery over substance I assume (not that I don't already).
S5. Email your friend Merouby if you don't want any comment on it.
R5. I have PMd him and emailed him, could you call him and tell him he should pick them up? This way, I won't have to post here, TIA!
S7. Many of the rights given to law enforcement in the patriot act were in place prior to the patriot act. Along with reading the patriot act and the constitution I suggest reading the Rico act as well. It's been upheld as constitutional for years.
r7. Suggesting that who reads what? Same comment as to the original poster, could you please point out what my position is? I do not have the benefit of knowing what it is without your intervention since I have not yet taken position.
What is being upheld as constitutional can still be debated can't it? If not, I would direct you to suggest pro-lifers should abandon their fight against Rowe VS Wade.