Williams and Caterham exhaust designs deemed 'illegal' - Mercedes-Benz Forum

LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
post #1 of 2 (permalink) Old 02-19-2013, 10:57 AM Thread Starter
CH4S Artist
Teutone's Avatar
Date registered: Sep 2004
Vehicle: 1985 500SEC, 1991 190E 2.6.
Location: Los Angeles / Hannover Germany
Posts: 34,523
Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Quoted: 1099 Post(s)
Lifetime Premium Member
(Thread Starter)
Williams and Caterham exhaust designs deemed 'illegal'

BBC Sport - Williams and Caterham exhaust designs deemed 'illegal'

19 February 2013
Williams and Caterham have been told by Formula 1's governing body, the FIA, that it considers the exhaust designs on their cars to be illegal.
The two teams have added extra bodywork rear of the exhaust to help enhance the way the gases work for aerodynamic effect, a key F1 technology.
But the FIA has told both teams it believes the designs contravene the rules governing bodywork in that area.

Andrew Benson
Chief F1 writer
"As with many areas of the Formula 1 rules, those governing exhausts are, to a degree, open to interpretation.

"The rule in question is article 5.8.4 of the technical regulations but there are also a series of 'clarifications' to teams from the FIA - which are not published - which constitute part of the rules.

"The key point here, according to the FIA, is that the sides of the channel down which the exhausts can run may not converge - ie the sides of the U-shape have to be either vertical or slope outwards.

"Both the Williams and Caterham designs are in clear contravention of this - Williams's because the sides form almost a complete circle separated only by a small slot; and Caterham's because there is a piece of bodywork across the whole channel.

"The FIA believes that if the sides of the tunnel begin to converge then the bodywork is stepping over the line which separates an exhaust with an incidental aerodynamic effect from one where the primary purpose is to affect the aerodynamic performance of the car.

"As ever, though, that line is grey - every single car on the grid has an exhaust outlet design that is designed to affect the aerodynamics.

"It is the FIA's very difficult job to decide which ones lie on the right side of the line of acceptability and which ones do not."

Williams and Caterham both say they are evaluating the situation.
A Williams spokeswoman said: "The team spoke with the FIA this morning which is when they gave us their view.
"The team are now seeking further clarification on this and a decision as to whether this design will be carried forward will be made before the first race."
A Caterham spokesman added: "We are continuing to evaluate a range of options at the pre-season tests as per our normal program."
The controversy surrounds the area of the car rear of the exhaust exits, which is strictly controlled in an attempt to reduce the teams' ability to harness exhaust gases to increase aerodynamic downforce.
Lotus technical director James Allison said two weeks ago that he did not expect Caterham's design to survive until the first race.
The rules dictate that exhaust gases may not be redirected. But all teams are doing so to some extent, placing open-topped channels after the exhaust exits that are designed to control the gases through something called the Coanda Effect, which dictates that gases travelling along a surface will tend to stay attached to it.
The issue with the Caterham and Williams is that they have taken differing approaches to trying to direct the gases more extensively.
Caterham have placed a small 'turning vane' (aerodynamically shaped piece of bodywork) in the channel, while Williams have almost totally enclosed the channel at one point, leaving just a tiny slot at the top.
Williams technical director Mike Coughlan initially told the media at the launch of the team's new car on Tuesday that he believed Caterham's design was "clearly not allowed" whereas his own team's design was.
Williams have now been forced to reassess the situation following the intervention by the FIA.
The governing body's stance means that the teams would risk being disqualified if they ran their cars in that specification at the first race in Melbourne, Australia on 15-17 March.
But the teams can continue to run them in testing because it does not count towards the world championship.
Teutone is offline  
Sponsored Links
post #2 of 2 (permalink) Old 02-19-2013, 02:19 PM
gerkebi's Avatar
Date registered: Oct 2005
Vehicle: 107, 115, 116, 123, 124, 126
Location: E-I-E-I-Ohio
Posts: 5,920
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Williams and Caterham exhaust designs deemed 'illegal'

This will be interesting. I love Williams' response. "Ours is legal, not so sure about theirs!"

Sent from AutoGuide.com App
gerkebi is offline  
Sponsored Links

  Mercedes-Benz Forum > General Mercedes-Benz Forums > Mercedes-Benz Motorsports & Racing

Quick Reply

Register Now

In order to be able to post messages on the Mercedes-Benz Forum forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.

User Name:
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Email Address:


Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Linear Mode

Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Title goes here

video goes here
description goes here. Read Full Story
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome