How Alonso and Vettel could have beaten Hamilton in Canada - Mercedes-Benz Forum

LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
post #1 of 3 (permalink) Old 06-22-2012, 11:59 PM Thread Starter
CH4S Artist
Teutone's Avatar
Date registered: Sep 2004
Vehicle: 1985 500SEC, 1991 190E 2.6.
Location: Los Angeles / Hannover Germany
Posts: 33,437
Mentioned: 11 Post(s)
Quoted: 937 Post(s)
Lifetime Premium Member
(Thread Starter)
How Alonso and Vettel could have beaten Hamilton in Canada

BBC Sport - How Alonso and Vettel could have beaten Hamilton in Canada

13 June 2012 Last updated at 12:16 GMT
How Alonso and Vettel could have beaten Hamilton in Canada
By Gary Anderson BBC F1 technical analyst

Lewis Hamilton and McLaren did everything absolutely right and took a deserved victory in the Canadian Grand Prix - but they could have been beaten by both Fernando Alonso and Sebastian Vettel if Ferrari and Red Bull had correctly called the race.

Alonso and Vettel slipped back from second and third respectively to fifth and fourth in the closing laps because they were trying to make a one-stop strategy work.

Alonso was a sitting duck in the last five laps as his tyres wore out completely.
Continue reading the main story

“It's obviously not easy to analyse these things on the fly - and there is a lot of pressure on the engineers involved to make the right decision”

He lost places to Lotus's Romain Grosjean, Sauber's Sergio Perez and finally Vettel, as the German recovered from making a late second stop for fresh tyres with seven laps to go.

I wrote in my post-race analysis column on Monday that Alonso and Ferrari could have beaten Hamilton had they have come in for a second stop before the McLaren driver.

But after looking through the numbers in more detail, it is now possible to see that both of them might have beaten Hamilton if they had made second stops after him as well.

If you analyse the lap times from lap 48 - two laps before Hamilton's second pit stop - to the end of the race, you can see Alonso losing time steadily as his tyres go off.

You can then compare Alonso's lap times to team-mate Felipe Massa, who stopped on lap 58 for fresh tyres.

If you give Massa's lap times from that point to Alonso on the assumption the Spaniard should at least have been able to match them (he'd probably have gone significantly quicker), Alonso is 1.5 seconds ahead of Hamilton at the end of the race.

When Massa came out of the pits, he was going at least a second faster than Alonso within a lap - and it soon became two seconds as Alonso tyres got worse and worse.

So Ferrari should have seen Massa's progress as soon as he came out of the pits and realised they were going in the wrong direction with Alonso.

To be fair to Ferrari, by lap 58, although it was obvious Hamilton was going to pass Alonso, it was not completely clear that Grosjean was going to catch him by the end of the race. When you consider the Ferrari's speed that point, it looked to be close.

But two laps later, with 10 to go, Grosjean was suddenly lapping more than a second faster than Alonso and was 10 seconds behind - and Alonso's lap times were dropping dramatically.

At that point Ferrari should have known he was going to lose not only the lead but second as well, and come in for tyres.

Alonso would have lost the place but Grosjean - who did make a one-stop strategy work - had been on that set of tyres since lap 21. Alonso's would have been 50 laps fresher, and he would easily have caught Grosjean again and passed him.

In the case of Red Bull, if Vettel had done the same as team-mate Mark Webber - who stopped for tyres on lap 52 - and then done the same lap times as the Australian, he would have been four seconds ahead of Hamilton at the end of the race.

Even if blind to anyone else, both Ferrari and Red Bull had access to their own team's lap times and that should have made them think about what they were doing.

It's obviously not easy to analyse these things on the fly - and there is a lot of pressure on the engineers involved to make the right decision - but they have computer programs that analyse these things for them in real time and project finishing positions.

If that is not showing you what you want to see, you have to change your plan. So they really should have responded.

Had they done that, they should have been able to catch up with Hamilton and, as they had fresher tyres than him, they may well have been able to pass - although with the proviso that Hamilton was only going as fast as he needed to in the final part of the race.

But even if they had not been able to get past, they both would at least have held onto the positions they were in at the time - second for Alonso and third for Vettel.

In Ferrari's case, that decision cost Alonso at least 10 points, and Vettel lost three. In a championship as tight as this, the title is likely to be won - and lost - by a lot less than that.

BBC F1 technical analyst Gary Anderson was talking to BBC Sport's Andrew Benson
Share this story

BBC © 2012
Teutone is offline  
Sponsored Links
post #2 of 3 (permalink) Old 06-23-2012, 07:59 AM
BenzWorld Senior Member
Date registered: Mar 2012
Vehicle: 1973 450SL-1968 911-1994 840ci-1967 Mustang
Location: Woodland Hills, California
Posts: 590
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Very true...especially when you know that Hami has a reputation of poor tire management.
gsjohnson is offline  
post #3 of 3 (permalink) Old 06-23-2012, 03:27 PM
BenzWorld Senior Member
calgary's Avatar
Date registered: May 2007
Vehicle: 2001 CL500
Location: Calgary, Alberta, Canada
Posts: 501
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Quoted: 11 Post(s)
"Could have, should have" I am certain you could analyse every race, and come up with a different winner. But that is racing....
calgary is online now  
Sponsored Links

  Mercedes-Benz Forum > General Mercedes-Benz Forums > Mercedes-Benz Motorsports & Racing

Quick Reply

Register Now

In order to be able to post messages on the Mercedes-Benz Forum forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.

User Name:
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Email Address:


  • Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
    Thread Tools
    Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
    Email this Page Email this Page
    Display Modes
    Linear Mode Linear Mode

    Posting Rules  
    You may post new threads
    You may post replies
    You may not post attachments
    You may not edit your posts

    BB code is On
    Smilies are On
    [IMG] code is On
    HTML code is Off
    Trackbacks are On
    Pingbacks are On
    Refbacks are On


    Title goes here

    video goes here
    description goes here. Read Full Story
    For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome