WOW - JB seems even more emotionally affected by this subject than I am. Are you aware your only means of addressing MB's denial of acceleration on a frontal collision so far has been "Instead of constantly quoting newton, show us pics of the passenger seat in your crash test"?
lol, all im doing is presenting plausible theories based on established facts. Something you have yet to do.
You have multiple accusations against MB, one of which has been your claim that the seat broke. I think its abundantly clear I was specifically addressing that, clear to everyone but you I guess.
Denial of acceleration on a frontal collision has nothing to do with my comments about the passenger seat. Again, you would get a lot more traction in your accusations against MB if you didn't misrepresent their comments in exactly the same way you've misrepresented mine here.
Basically ive asked you for evidence again and again, and still nothing from you.
Are you aware my passenger seat did not 'break' nor 'its locks failed'? I thought this dialogue was starting to resemble similar dialogue from the past. I know I can take a sledge hammer and cause that inboard seat top to bend and also know I'd need a lot more force and time than a hammer impact to fold the bottom outboard side.
this was literally what you claimed earlier in the thread. If you are changing your accusations to fit whatever new data you have, appreciate it if you would let us know. Broken seat was a big part of your earlier complaint against MB, now according to you, its not relevant or it didn't happen.
But you will not understand that for whatever reason you're so emotionally affected by this dialogue. Do you read your own words JB? "Wanna, TOLD, evasive, simple, straw experiment, cast iron, earth shattering revelation...." You sound like a mad-man but more like a donkey to me.
lol. Its not me who sounds like a madman here. While your insults are amusing, they still aren't new evidence. Haven't seen that yet, but ill keep asking for you to present something tangible. If this is the best you can do, oh well.
The day someone like you actually offers someone like me 'advice' worth $20k is the day I get to ride a flying pig thru hell while eating a Magnum ice-cream bar with Cindy Crawford on my lap
. You're taking this all so personally that I recommend you visit a psychologist for some anxiety testing or anger-control treatments. Unless you're making love to the tailpipe of your old Mercedes-Benz's every night since you're reacting as if I said something about your 'ladies'. Whatever the case I'm not going to allow you to waste another minute of my life nor anyone else's reading this thread. Please go harass another thread. It's that simple so shooo, move on, go away, stop pestering us with your disturbing hatred towards me personally. You do realize you're delusional enough to believe I'm going to alter my publication plan over your demands for my crash test details? Pop another prozac, zanex, morphine or whatever it is you take to ease that hate full mind/heart of yours. Your behavior is becoming blatantly queer. Try some more vaseline or maybe some fresh banana peels on those 70's & 80's Benz's tailpipes of yours. It's just material JB, and I'm just dealing with some undeniable physics that your personal intent and/or lack of intelligence will never let you understand. How strange to get so emotional over something you have absolutely nothing to do with? That must suck to live that emotionally charged. And I thought I had it bad contending with this experience. I couldn't imagine experiencing your emotions at my own will over random people's experiences. Up the dosage and get a grip man. It ain't your fight, it ain't your defense. Enjoy what happens next.
again, funny, but new evidence? is there any in this rant? I don't see anything. My interest in this thread is id like to see you actually convince a single person that your theory happened. So far in your life and in this thread that has not happened.
Present some real data that supports the torque lunge, broken seat (oh wait, NOT broken seat now), speed of impact, air bag delay, FMVSS that says airbags should save lives WITHOUT seatbelts, ect, and you might start having an argument.
So far, your outlandish theory erodes like sand in a rainstorm against the far more likely theory of reckless driving, driver error, and no seatbelts. Present something compelling that is also not complete fabrication or opinion on your part, and then you have a case.