Please don't accuse me of "having an axe to grind", comment on my financials or claim I need to blame anyone. That doesn't say much about your character and I'll opt not to reply to such personal irrelevant attacks. If you believe international corporations are only responsible for "givens" then that's your perrogative.
You are joking right?
did you say this?
There is so much more to this picture that I haven't mentioned. A misrepresented disbarred attorney who had a former relationship with the CL55 AMG's insurance provider (Progressive) was a development partner while his brother was my claim attorney. While Progressive requested over 1500-pages of my records, the Weinrebs were conspiring with my own brother, John Soliman all sharing my personal claim file (with liquid financials) to act against my founded projects. John Soliman even stole the insured amount of my personal injuries through our NY co.'s bank account (with a false 'overpayment' claim) later falsifying IRS records. The accident is actually the least of it all. During discovery, Progressive denied a relationship with Michael Weinreb when I pulled the criminal complaint that listed Progressive as one of his victims of theft (>$50,000) from his fraudulent personal-injury accident claim ring. Now under being considered by a Motion for Sanctions as Progression's Motion for Dismissal/Summary Judgment is under consideration. This is a "peck the weak-chicken-down" syndrome of human nature except $$ isn't the only thing that makes a man strong. I'd live this accident 100 more times to avoid the pecking that occurred afterwards.
Im pretty sure you also said this-
One cannot move on with their life when an event and its resulting fallout have yet to get people's claws out of my back 4-years later and I'm still in the same survival mode I was in while facing their dashboard (without an airbag).
and lets not forget this-
This matter won't stop in a courtroom by any means. I just lost the 5 most prime years of my life while launching over $30M of projects that I haven't been involved with since Sept. of 2007 (before everyone's scapegoat of "oh, the market"). Yet I'm being held liable for $9M worth of notes fraudulently renewed and modified against my name/noticed will (as a non-managing member) in 2008. I'm not seeking a quick buck. I'm seeking my life back against a bunch of hogs trying to drown me in their feces while drowning themselves. And have incurred more than enough losses and hardships to justify accountability now.
why wouldn't I comment on your financials, YOU are the one who brought them up. YOU are the one who continually reiterates the financial state you are in. The most Ive said is it sure seems like a good reason to sue MB, and it does. Id say in return that it sure says a lot about you character that you would post this completely unsupported thread before even doing the crash tests, and assume everyone would just agree with you!
It seems clear that you want the freedom of posting every single little terrible thing that has happened to you to support your position, but if someone disagrees with you touching on that same information, its a personal irrelevant attack.
Can't have it both ways, don't use it, or let it be discussed.
We've wasted enough of our time over this matter. When I have more time I'll post more photos of the roadway so you can understand the big picture.
You've been arguing about this for months and you have not posted additional pictures, despite that being requested a number of times?
Hopefully for MB's sake, NOBODY sees the crash test results. Otherwise they'll watch their $80B annual revenue cut in half again not only over their own lack of consideration to high performance safety systems, but also over the way they chose to treat the first person who lived thru their issues. Hopefully, you're never in my shoes and if so, don't have to listen to someone playing Mr. Attorney personally attacking you with absolutely no logic.
I doubt that. I think MB is pretty safe from this preposterous nonsense, but if it makes you happy to pursue, every man to his own.
Im amused that you are getting upset and dismissive.
I thought that your goal was to convince people of these safety flaws, right? As initially a disinterested third party, every thing you have said convinces me that your interpretation of events represents a SINGLE ideal chain of unlikely events that support what you WANT, not what may have actually happened.
I have continually asked you to give us more evidence, provide us with more pictures, PROVE what you say has some merit with corroborating evidence. Instead of doing just that, you start posting about your injuries and your finances, or just get defensive and ask me to "prove" otherwise.
You want everyone to prove that your theory is wrong, you forget that first you have to prove that your theory is right, otherwise there is no case. As far as all other parties are concerned, the issue has been put to rest 5 years ago, now you are trying to revive it.