need help finding a good diesel 92-99 - Mercedes-Benz Forum

LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
post #1 of 6 (permalink) Old 01-13-2014, 05:21 PM Thread Starter
BenzWorld Newbie
Date registered: Jan 2014
Vehicle: none - looking for reliable diesel, looking at 1992-1995 2.5 l 5 cylinder vs newer (1999) 3 l 6 cyl
Location: USA
Posts: 1
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
(Thread Starter)
need help finding a good diesel 92-99

got recommended to look at 92-95 300D, 5 cylinder 2.5 l with under 150k miles

saw today (well recommended) 99 E300TD, 6 cyl, 3.0 l.

Couple of questions on both

- highway mileage at 70 mph?
- relative reliability (know they're both good cars, want owners' comments)
- pros and cons? With winter tires, how are they in the winter?
- any other comments/thoughts
rajdigby is offline  
Sponsored Links
post #2 of 6 (permalink) Old 02-20-2014, 04:19 PM
BenzWorld Newbie
PJ's SL 320's Avatar
Date registered: Feb 2014
Vehicle: 1995 SL 320
Location: Elbert, CO
Posts: 4
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
I have a '91 300D, 280,000 miles on the car and 145,000 on rebuilt engine (I bought the car with a blown engine, they had run it out of oil). This has been a really nice driving car, about 32 MPG at 70, does good with winter tires.

I have had the older 300Ds and they were good but stepping up to the 90's with the 2.5 Turbo is a whole other world. Excellent heat, A/C, solid as a rock.
PJ's SL 320 is offline  
post #3 of 6 (permalink) Old 02-20-2014, 05:50 PM
BenzWorld Elite
Kajtek1's Avatar
Date registered: Dec 2005
Vehicle: E320/E250 Bluetec R129 SL500 - $1300 car ........ Ford F350 6.7l
Location: V E G A S
Posts: 32,681
Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Quoted: 1340 Post(s)
Both engines will deliver about the same mpg and reliability, but the 2.5 has about 120 hp and is just adequate for grades, while 3 liter DT with 174 HP can be consider sport car.
1999 also has traction and ESP with more airbags, so safety is quite different as well.
Kajtek1 is offline  
post #4 of 6 (permalink) Old 02-20-2014, 09:30 PM
BenzWorld Member
Date registered: Jul 2010
Vehicle: 2012 S350 BlueTEC, 2005 S430, 1999 E300,
Location: AR
Posts: 178
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Quoted: 21 Post(s)
I have a very good 1999 E300 Turbo diesel and also a 1990 350SDL. Would be willing to sell either or both. They are both reliable daily drivers, the '99 has more power and better mpg. Thinking about buying a new E250 BlueTEC, so that's why I'm willing to sell the 2 older diesels. PM me if interested.
seubill is offline  
post #5 of 6 (permalink) Old 03-13-2014, 11:03 PM
BenzWorld Elite
redghost's Avatar
Date registered: Oct 2012
Vehicle: 1972 220 D, 1974 450SL, 1995 E300D 2002 S430, 1976 300D, 1986 SDL, 1982 SD
Location: Seattle
Posts: 2,046
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Quoted: 292 Post(s)
Best of the best diesel for that era would be the 1995 E300D. It had the sturdy and reliable w124 body and the newer OM 606 engine. None of the messed up computers and electronics, build quality was high, and I was able to get 680 miles on a tank cruising speed on the highways.

I looked at the W210 cars and the decline in quality was palpable compared to the W124. Talking to mechanics at the shop, they were not complimentary toward the 210 either. Not that they complained about being kept busy. To them, they were a can of worms nobody in his right mind would want. Better to look at the CDI from their perspective, as it was not as trouble prone from the start.


74 450SL - Froggy
'02 s320 - Victor
'86 300SDL - Polei
'82 300SD - Allen

Retired cars
'76 300D - Voldemort
'95 E300D - Cleo
'72 220D - Gump
'87 300SDL - POS SDL

92 300SE - #1 boys ride
redghost is offline  
post #6 of 6 (permalink) Old 03-14-2014, 09:15 AM
BenzWorld Elite
Kajtek1's Avatar
Date registered: Dec 2005
Vehicle: E320/E250 Bluetec R129 SL500 - $1300 car ........ Ford F350 6.7l
Location: V E G A S
Posts: 32,681
Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Quoted: 1340 Post(s)
Even cdi are more advanced and fuel saving engines, in Europe the W210 with 3 liter diesel turbo is the most loved.
Suppose cdi driven on autobahns like to burn pistons at higher mileage, while the 1995 E300D simply has no power to keep with traffic.

Kajtek1 is offline  
Sponsored Links

  Mercedes-Benz Forum > General Mercedes-Benz Forums > General Mercedes-Benz

Quick Reply

Register Now

In order to be able to post messages on the Mercedes-Benz Forum forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.

User Name:
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Email Address:


Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Linear Mode

Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Title goes here

video goes here
description goes here. Read Full Story
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome