My experience with Blue (in)Efficiency - Mercedes-Benz Forum

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
post #1 of 23 (permalink) Old 12-25-2009, 04:04 AM Thread Starter
BenzWorld Junior Member
 
Date registered: Nov 2002
Vehicle: C220CDI / E250CDI COupé
Location: Belgium - Gent
Posts: 11
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
(Thread Starter)
Angry My experience with Blue (in)Efficiency

Hi All,

I have 2 mercedes cars:
-C220 Cdi Break of 2002 ( 225.000km, 5 speed automatic, 205 16" tires, 197g CO2/km.)
-E250 Cdi Coupé Blue Efficiency ( 7000km, 5 speed automatic, 235/255 18" tires - AMG pack, 163g CO2/km.)

As you can see in the specs the new one should be much cleaner and consume less diesel.

I rode one week with the old one and 1 week with the new one, the same trip, same speeds, more or less the same traffic density.

With my 9 year old MB, I had to fuel up at 720km, then I can fill 50L in the tank.
With Blue Efficeincy, I had to fuel up at 700km, then I can fill 55L in the tank.

So the old one is on paper the dirtiest one, but in real life the new one is the most consuming vehicule.

Mercedes is lying about the new cars which consume (according to them ) less fuel !!!
schoenmaekers@hotmai is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #2 of 23 (permalink) Old 12-25-2009, 05:22 AM
BenzWorld Elite
 
Diesel Benz's Avatar
 
Date registered: Dec 2005
Vehicle: 222.132 & 221.122 & 212.025 & 906.633
Location: Europe
Posts: 10,322
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Quoted: 34 Post(s)
Too short distance to make accurate comparisons. You should at least fill up at the same station with the same pistol and preferrably do it for a few fill-ups.

Are you sure you did not use the gas pedal the same way with both cars? I mean if you did, the 250CDI gave you a lot faster accelerations. Even if you tried to drive similarly, you might not do it.

The difference looks significant though (both compared to factory specs). Perhaps your 250CDI improves. Or does it have those problematic injectors still, I don't know if that can affect fuel consumption or do they just suddenly fail.
Diesel Benz is offline  
post #3 of 23 (permalink) Old 12-25-2009, 11:39 AM
BenzWorld Elite
 
Kajtek1's Avatar
 
Date registered: Dec 2005
Vehicle: W211 E320 Bluetec R129 SL500 - $1300 car ........ Ford F350 6l
Location: CA Bay Area
Posts: 31,756
Mentioned: 9 Post(s)
Quoted: 1120 Post(s)
I am not very familiar with the listed engines, but to my knowledge the blue technology is using more fuel because of some additional stuff on the engine.
The same way we do have California gasoline formula, that diluted with environmental stuff takes about 15% more to power the vehicle than the gas from other states.
Comparing new and old technology is pretty tricky.
In US recreational diesels are still using older engines and cdi technology still didn't make it to the industry. So I am comparing my 1972, 2-cycle Detroit diesel, that suppose was design in 1930's with similar size newer motorhomes. My makes 5.5 to 6 mpg, the newer less than 1 mile more. So much for 70 years of technology progress.
Than I compared my 1998 E300td with 2005 E320cdi. The latest offers pretty solid 20% fuel savings with way better acceleration to top it.
Kajtek1 is offline  
post #4 of 23 (permalink) Old 12-25-2009, 02:55 PM Thread Starter
BenzWorld Junior Member
 
Date registered: Nov 2002
Vehicle: C220CDI / E250CDI COupé
Location: Belgium - Gent
Posts: 11
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
(Thread Starter)
- The distance is about 2x60km
- I did fill up in the same gas station, but I don't know anymore if it was the same pump.
- The 250Cdi accelerates a lot faster than the 220Cdi, but it is about 50km highway, with a 'steady' speed, so no or very less accelerations.
- The injectors have already been replaced. Maybe they need some break-in period ?

I'm realy not pleased with the fuel consumption, mainly because they promise it uses less...
Next week, I'll put my winter rimms/tires on the 250Cdi ( 16" - 205 tires ), so then I can realy compare, maybe it's because of the 18" - 255/235 AMG wheels...
schoenmaekers@hotmai is offline  
post #5 of 23 (permalink) Old 12-25-2009, 03:55 PM
BenzWorld Member
 
Date registered: Jan 2009
Vehicle: 95SS(165k) 06CDI(SOLD) 2014 GLK250
Location: RVC
Posts: 396
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
get ready for a statement retraction when your 16" wheels bump your mileage

just sayin
BlackOpalCDI is offline  
post #6 of 23 (permalink) Old 12-26-2009, 05:16 AM Thread Starter
BenzWorld Junior Member
 
Date registered: Nov 2002
Vehicle: C220CDI / E250CDI COupé
Location: Belgium - Gent
Posts: 11
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
(Thread Starter)
To BlackOpalCDI,

What do you mean, I don't understand what you are saying...
You mean it will consume a lot less with the 16" wheels on it?
schoenmaekers@hotmai is offline  
post #7 of 23 (permalink) Old 12-26-2009, 08:04 AM
BenzWorld Elite
 
Diesel Benz's Avatar
 
Date registered: Dec 2005
Vehicle: 222.132 & 221.122 & 212.025 & 906.633
Location: Europe
Posts: 10,322
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Quoted: 34 Post(s)
16" wheels (and narrower tyres) would give better mileage but I assume the CO2 figure is from the registration documents, the 250 CDI would have even lower CO2 with standard equipment (including smaller tyres and specifically because of smaller tyres).
Diesel Benz is offline  
post #8 of 23 (permalink) Old 12-26-2009, 09:57 AM
BenzWorld Elite
 
Kajtek1's Avatar
 
Date registered: Dec 2005
Vehicle: W211 E320 Bluetec R129 SL500 - $1300 car ........ Ford F350 6l
Location: CA Bay Area
Posts: 31,756
Mentioned: 9 Post(s)
Quoted: 1120 Post(s)
Schoen you have to do more accurate comparison. While break in period might still be an issue, you have to compare the same situations.
For last few years I have the same 500 miles route I drive few times a year. Drive with the same speeds and VW Jetta tdi was making 32 mpg on it. The E320cdi was making 32 mpg as well. But having more than double hp in Mercedes the trip was taking me about 1/2 hr less. Would I do slow accelerations in E to match those in VW, I bet the mpg would be higher.
Kajtek1 is offline  
post #9 of 23 (permalink) Old 12-26-2009, 03:13 PM
BenzWorld Member
 
Date registered: Jan 2009
Vehicle: 95SS(165k) 06CDI(SOLD) 2014 GLK250
Location: RVC
Posts: 396
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by schoenmaekers@hotmai View Post
To BlackOpalCDI,

What do you mean, I don't understand what you are saying...
You mean it will consume a lot less with the 16" wheels on it?
that is exactly what I mean

16" is much more energy eff. than a 18" plus green energy tires are not available for 18".. which makes the 16" an even better choice
BlackOpalCDI is offline  
post #10 of 23 (permalink) Old 12-27-2009, 02:48 AM Thread Starter
BenzWorld Junior Member
 
Date registered: Nov 2002
Vehicle: C220CDI / E250CDI COupé
Location: Belgium - Gent
Posts: 11
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
(Thread Starter)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Diesel Benz View Post
16" wheels (and narrower tyres) would give better mileage but I assume the CO2 figure is from the registration documents, the 250 CDI would have even lower CO2 with standard equipment (including smaller tyres and specifically because of smaller tyres).
Yes, the CO2 figure comes from the registration document. It was measured with the 255/235 AMG wheels on it because they are also mentioned on the document.
schoenmaekers@hotmai is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Reply

  Mercedes-Benz Forum > General Mercedes-Benz Forums > General Mercedes-Benz

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now



In order to be able to post messages on the Mercedes-Benz Forum forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.

User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.

Password:


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Email Address:
OR

Log-in











  • Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
     
    Thread Tools
    Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
    Email this Page Email this Page
    Display Modes
    Linear Mode Linear Mode



    Similar Threads
    Topic Author Forum Replies Last Post
    Ah... those efficiency consultants mlfun Off-Topic 4 10-05-2009 03:44 AM
    FUEL EFFICIENCY tnsr35 R171 SLK-Class 13 10-12-2008 10:05 PM
    Fuel Efficiency MY2008ML350 General Mercedes-Benz 2 08-28-2008 05:02 PM
    Your GL fuel efficiency?? dmk X164 GL-Class 27 11-03-2006 07:51 AM
    HF Blue and Sprint experience? Srgtfury Audio & Telematics Forum 0 07-31-2004 11:39 PM

    Posting Rules  
    You may post new threads
    You may post replies
    You may not post attachments
    You may not edit your posts

    BB code is On
    Smilies are On
    [IMG] code is On
    HTML code is Off
    Trackbacks are On
    Pingbacks are On
    Refbacks are On

     

    Title goes here

    close
    video goes here
    description goes here. Read Full Story
    For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome