[mcbear]

Originally Posted by SobeOne

What an idiotic and pathetic thread. I often wonder how the supporters of this empty suit get so venomous when it comes to Clinton? What makes them so afraid if they have such fantastic candidate?

I guess it is out of that fear for example, you weren't exactly clear to clarify that this voting record . . .

. . . is from the Illinois legislature where Obama didn't vote YES or NO, but PRESENT, 129 times, thus avoiding to take an stance in issues and even bills that he sponsored or cosponsored. Among those, bills on gun controls, reproductive rights and human rights and anti-discrimination laws.

Your mischaracterization of Hillary Clinton's legislative record is worthy of Rush Limbaugh, Bravo!

Now, Obama demonizing the fact that the Clintons are rich people able to contribute to the senators campaign (actually it was a loan and it has been repaid already), not Romney rich but very wealthy nonetheless, only shows his disconnect with reality and his desperate eagerness to win denomination by destroying Hillary at all costs, even at the expense of the democratic party unity, as he and his wife haven't been shy to suggest. He should keep in mind that he wont succeed in what the republicans didn't achieve in 8 years.

Instead, Obama should go out and set the record straight on his real estate deals with Tony Rezko and the rumors that Hugo Chavez is channeling funds to his campaign. The question is, though: Can he?

Thank God there is a real choice!

Both sides of the O/H campaign need to strive for clarity and transparency. But please, if you post and accuse someone of being "worthy of Rush"... just maybe you should tighten up the Chavez comment with some facts.